The Secular Conscience
By AUSTIN DACEY
Added: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 UTC
Released March 18, 2008
Buy it now at Amazon.com
Read the First Chapter!
THE SECULAR CONSCIENCE: WHY BELIEF BELONGS IN PUBLIC LIFE
Has secularism lost its soul? From Washington to the Vatican to Tehran, religion is a public matter as never before, and secular values--individual autonomy, pluralism, separation of religion and state, and freedom of conscience--are attacked on all sides and defended by few. The godly claim a monopoly on the language of morality, while secular liberals stand accused of standing for nothing.
Secular liberals did not lose their moral compass: they gave it away. For generations, too many have insisted that questions of conscience--religion, ethics, and values--are "private matters" that have no place in public debate. Ironically, this ideology hinders them from subjecting religion to due scrutiny when it encroaches on individual rights, and from unabashedly advocating their own moral vision in politics for fear of "imposing" their beliefs on others.
In his incisive new book, The Secular Conscience (Prometheus Books, March 2008), philosopher Austin Dacey calls for a bold rethinking of the nature of conscience and its role in public life. Inspired by an earlier liberal tradition he traces to Spinoza and John Stuart Mill, he urges liberals to lift their self-imposed gag order and defend a renewed secularism based on the objective moral value of conscience.
Conscience is like the free press in an open society: it is protected from coercion and control, not because it is private, but because it has a vital role in the public sphere. Conscience is free, but not liberated from shared standards of truth and right. Conscience must come before any and all faiths, for it is what tells us whether or not to believe. In this way, it supplies a shared vocabulary for meaningful dialogue in a diverse society, and an ethical lingua franca in which to address the world.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Austin Dacey is a representative to the United Nations for the Center for Inquiry in New York City, where he works on issues of science and secular values. He is the author of articles in numerous publications including the New York Times. He holds a doctorate in applied ethics and social philosophy.
PRAISE FOR THE SECULAR CONSCIENCE
Dacey seeks nothing less than to interrupt a suicide, and he has written a beautiful primer on how our secular tradition can be rescued from self-defeat. The Secular Conscience reveals how simplistic notions of privacy, tolerance, and freedom keep dangerous ideas sheltered from public debate. This is an extraordinarily useful and lucid book.
- Sam Harris, author of the New York Times best sellers, The End of Faith and Letter to a Christian Nation
On almost all the hot--button issues-abortion, embryo-destructive research, same-sex marriage, Darwinism as a comprehensive philosophy, etc.--Dacey is, in my judgment, on the wrong side. But he is right about one very big thing. These contests are not between people who, on the one side, are trying to impose their morality on others, and people who, on the other side, subscribe to a purely procedural and amoral rationality. . . The Secular Conscience was written in order to advance the fortunes of liberal secularism in the public square. On many questions of great public moment, most of us will disagree with Austin Dacey. At the same time, he should be recognized as an ally in his contention that these are moral questions that must be addressed by moral argument.
- Richard John Neuhaus, First Things
Austin Dacey's The Secular Conscience is sorely needed at a time when both the religious right and the religious left claim that there can be no public or private morality without religion. With wit and a philosopher's insight, Dacey explains exactly why secular morality, grounded in an ethical approach that relies on reason rather than supernatural faith, must be restored to the public square.
- Susan Jacoby, author, The Age of American Unreason
Against the cliche that there can be no morality without God, Austin Dacey mounts a rejoinder so intellectually and morally satisfying that all should think twice before repeating that "truism" again. His arguments are so fair-minded, knowledgable, and objective that they demonstrate, in their very form and tone, the values of fair-mindedness, knowledgability and objectivity for which he advocates. A work at once philosphically rich and morally inspiring, The Secular Conscience makes an invaluable contribution to the charged conversation concerning religion and reason.
- Rebecca Goldstein, author of Betraying Spinoza
Finally, a case for secularism that does not seek to rid the public square of religion, but which shows that it can be a place for all to exercise their deepest convictions civilly and on equal terms. Bravo!
- Mark Silk, Director of the Leonard E. Greenberg Center for the Study of Religion in Public Life at Trinity College
Whenever I watch a riot over cartoons or meet another Muslim dissident forced to write under a pseudonym, I wonder, where are the Western secular liberals? Why do they shrink from defending freedom of conscience for all? Thanks to Austin Dacey, I now have an answer. As his piercing analysis shows, liberals have lost their grip on the real meaning of freedom. Only with a restored commitment to conscience as an objective moral ideal can they face down fundamentalists while constructively engaging with reformers of the faith. The Secular Conscience should be read by every friend of the open society.
- Ibn Warraq, author, Defending the West
There is much here for a religious believer to applaud. Dacey's insistence on conscience as a corrigible moral guide, on a public square informed by the vigorous discursive pursuit of first principle and their defense in reason are extremely positive. At a certain point, a believer must part company but for much of the way we can walk and work together.
- Alan Mittleman, Director of the Louis Finkelstein Institute for Religious and Social Studies, Jewish Theological Seminary
With intellectual vigor and moral confidence, Austin Dacey demonstrates the self-defeating fallacies of efforts to privatize individual conscience and belief. Secularists and non-theists should heed his call to join public debates about fundamental ethical values, instead of questioning the impulse to conduct them.
- Wendy Kaminer, lawyer and author, Free for All
The Secular Conscience breathes new life into an old topic. Dacey thinks outside the box. His argument for allowing believers back into the "public square"-and then subjecting them to a forceful critique-is fresh and convincing, as is his surprising critique of the reasoning in Roe v Wade. And his chapters on secular ethics are superb.
- Peter Singer, Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics, Princeton University
In a dazzling display of erudition, this book presents a cogent argument for secular liberalism. Dacey . . . claims that values and ethics--defining what is right and wrong, good and bad--are not the sole domain of theologians. To contribute to our understanding of enlightened secularism, he cites like-minded thinkers such as Thomas Hobbes, John Dewey, Adam Smith, John Rawls, Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Plato, John Locke and Baruch Spinoza, among others. Dacey's presentation is especially timely in view of the emphasis by some current presidential candidates on their religious identity. Not since 1960 when John F. Kennedy, as a Roman Catholic, argued for church-state separation has the issue of secularism versus religion been so prominent in a national
election. Dacey's analysis helps to put this question into the larger perspective of liberty and conscience. Dacey advocates for democracy lover authoritarianism, not hesitating to challenge theocratic Islam, for example, as a "new totalitarianism." He calls on secular liberals to stand up for "reason and science, the separation of church and state, freedom of belief, personal autonomy, equality, toleration, and self-criticism." This is a thoughtful, well-reasoned argument for progressive secularism.
- Publishers Weekly
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
“Why Are You Atheists So Angry?” To Be...
Greta Christina - Greta Christina's... 11 Comments
“Why Are You Atheists So Angry?” To Be Published By Pitchstone!
Book Review: Freedom of Religion & The...
Bruce Everett - Rousing Departures 11 Comments
Book Review: Freedom of Religion & The Secular State
Herb Silverman champions atheism with...
Will Moredock - Charleston City Paper 10 Comments
Russel Blackford reviews Attack of the...
Russell Blackford - Metamagician and... 24 Comments
Currently reading - Attack of the Theocrats by Sean Faircloth
Three articles by Steven Pinker,...
- - Religion and Ethics 40 Comments
Three articles by Steven Pinker, Russell Blackford and John Gray
Lawrence M. Krauss on A Universe from...
Andrew P Street - TimeOut Sydney 16 Comments

Lawrence M. Krauss on
A Universe from Nothing
MORE BY AUSTIN DACEY
United Nations Affirms the Human Right...
Austin Dacey - religiondispatches.org 57 Comments
Late last month, the UN issued a new statement on the extent of freedom of speech under international law. It says that laws restricting blasphemy as such are incompatible with universal human rights standards.
Austin Dacey - CSI 25 Comments
The secularist case against...
Austin Dacey - The Washington Post 28 Comments
'Framing Science' and The...
Austin Dacey 52 Comments



















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page