85% of Americans Want a Presidential Debate on Science2. Comment #179522 by notsobad on May 13, 2008 at 11:12 am
3. Comment #179540 by davemei on May 13, 2008 at 11:30 am
4. Comment #179557 by Tetsujin on May 13, 2008 at 11:52 am
"...Issues also considered serious by a majority of U.S. adults include global economic competition (55%), poverty (53%) and climate change (53%).... "5. Comment #179568 by mesomodel on May 13, 2008 at 12:04 pm
6. Comment #179637 by Border Collie on May 13, 2008 at 1:00 pm
7. Comment #179648 by Nova on May 13, 2008 at 1:13 pm
A majority (84%) also agree that scientific innovations are improving our standard of livingWHAT?! This is very bad news! 16% of Americans think science has contributed nothing to humanity!
A majority of U.S. adults say that past scientific research has contributed "a great deal" or "a lot" to their quality of life today (67%) and that today's research will continue to do so in the future (72%)More crazy, what do these 33% think gave them everything they see around them? It's the sheer unthinking nature of them that baffles me! (how can more (72%) think science will help us in the future than think it helps us now (62%)? Or is that 72% of the 67% think it will help us in the future, so that only about 50% of Americans think science is of any use whatsoever?)
9. Comment #179701 by Steven Mading on May 13, 2008 at 2:17 pm
On the one hand this sounds like a great idea with promise, but on the other hand I think it would backfire. Think about what would happen to any candidate that made a scientifically sound statement that happens to be hostile to religion. Because that would kill the candidate's chances of being elected, we'd end up hearing a lot of NOMA bullshit being spread around in that debate.10. Comment #179716 by Ty_Webb on May 13, 2008 at 2:56 pm
"...Issues also considered serious by a majority of U.S. adults include global economic competition (55%), poverty (53%) and climate change (53%).... "
So...
Issues not considered serious by a large minority of U.S. adults include global economic competition (45%), poverty (47%) and climate change (47%)
So, you could literally flip a coin and see if the "average" american cares.
11. Comment #179758 by Damien White on May 13, 2008 at 4:31 pm
It's nice to see how Americans think when their judgement is not being clouded by overt religosity. Does anyone think these same results would have been garnered had the first question the survey asked been about evolution?12. Comment #179761 by liberalartist on May 13, 2008 at 4:37 pm
13. Comment #179800 by rod-the-farmer on May 13, 2008 at 7:09 pm
14. Comment #179810 by Styrer- on May 13, 2008 at 7:54 pm
I am sure that Leon Kass and his ilk will attempt to persuade Bush that 85% of Americans are simply going through a little tantrum, stomping their little ignorant irreligious feet, and not REALLY desirous of better quality of life and of increased longevity on foot of scientific investigations.15. Comment #179818 by ChartreuseMuse on May 13, 2008 at 8:10 pm
16. Comment #179826 by dragonfirematrix on May 13, 2008 at 8:28 pm
17. Comment #179880 by Styrer- on May 13, 2008 at 11:27 pm
Comment #179828 by babrock on May 13, 2008 at 8:37 pm18. Comment #179904 by gcdavis on May 14, 2008 at 1:25 am
19. Comment #179917 by King of NH on May 14, 2008 at 1:52 am
20. Comment #179921 by enew on May 14, 2008 at 1:57 am
hey 85% of how many? 10, 20 100. 1000.100000. its like i am living in a fantasy novel. What is wrong with my fellow unbelievers 85% of 10 people is what? they want a presidential debate on science ? how many ? it is more probable that the the people who answered are trying to find more reasons to believe in god.21. Comment #179937 by Incredulous on May 14, 2008 at 2:40 am
Lies, damn lies and statistics! However, I think it would be a welcome change for an American debate to focus on Science and its place in delivering quality of life than to listen to them continually rant on about the imaginary effects of imaginary conversations with imaginary gods. Maybe this kind of thing does signal a ray of light appearing over the horizon.22. Comment #180003 by glittergulch on May 14, 2008 at 4:50 am
23. Comment #180048 by robj on May 14, 2008 at 6:25 am
Research related to Science is crucial for mankind and potentially the long term survival of our earth. Science also promotes innovation for the younger part of society, which will lead our nation(s) in the future.24. Comment #180073 by mixmastergaz on May 14, 2008 at 7:17 am
25. Comment #180153 by Double Bass Atheist on May 14, 2008 at 9:27 am
26. Comment #180157 by AmericanGodless on May 14, 2008 at 9:41 am
27. Comment #180181 by tieInterceptor on May 14, 2008 at 10:47 am
• Only 19% say it is acceptable for elected officials to hold back or alter scientific reports if they conflict with their own views �" 16% of Republicans and 21% of Democrats.
28. Comment #180218 by Steven Mading on May 14, 2008 at 11:36 am
From /13. rod-the-farmer/
But there are enough of them that when they are active or vocal, there is a strong possibility they can over-rule the majority, who may well be too busy to cast a vote, or even raise their voices. As I say, good news AND bad.
29. Comment #180230 by Devolution on May 14, 2008 at 12:10 pm
30. Comment #180236 by adent1066 on May 14, 2008 at 12:22 pm
While such a debate is sorely needed, I feel that this poll cannot accurately reflect the actual desires of the American populace. I have a very hard time believing that 85% of the US wants such a debate. Is this is a the same population that watches American Idol & votes red ? Maybe there's hope after all ?31. Comment #180335 by snoov on May 14, 2008 at 3:53 pm
I think there's a problem with the question.32. Comment #180338 by Rawaz on May 14, 2008 at 4:02 pm
I think Obama gave a very detailed vision about what he thinks about technology @ Google33. Comment #180499 by DamnDirtyApe on May 15, 2008 at 5:54 am
Indeed, I thought Obama's google speech was very promising. I'd even go as far as saying he's a bit of a geek.34. Comment #181302 by studiorat on May 16, 2008 at 9:32 pm
35. Comment #184264 by phil rimmer on May 24, 2008 at 8:31 am
... said Craig Barrett, Chairman of Intel and one of the supporters of the Science Debate initiative, "Without the best education system and aggressive investments in basic research and development we will become a second rate economic power.
1. Comment #179521 by jimbob on May 13, 2008 at 11:11 am
Great idea -- somebody ask McCain how, from a geological perspective, he can "see the hand of god in the grand canyon."Other Comments by jimbob