Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Monday, July 7, 2008 | Reason : Comedy | print version Print | Comments |

Document Origin of the Novel Species Noodleous doubleous: Evidence for Intelligent Design

by Thomas D. Schneider, Ph.D. - Frederick, MD

Thanks to Shrunk for the link

http://www.fred.net/tds/noodles/noodle.html

Origin of the Novel Species Noodleous doubleous: Evidence for Intelligent Design
Thomas D. Schneider, Ph.D.
Frederick, MD


Abstract

Penne Rigate will spontaneously insert itself into Rigatoni (order pasta) under liquid to gas transition conditions of H2O to create the previously unobserved species Noodleous doubleous. The estimated probability of this spontaneous generation event is too low to be explained by thermodynamics and therefore apparently represents intelligent design.

Introduction

It has been claimed by Intelligent Design advocates* that patterns observed in nature with a sufficiently low probability provide direct evidence for intelligent design, i.e., God. Here I report evidence for the spontaneous formation of a new life form in a prebiotic pasta soup.

Materials and Methods

Approximately 2.5 l of pre-filtered, activated carbon filtered and reverse-osmosis purified H2O (BestWater, Shaklee Corporation 4747 Willow Road Pleasanton, CA 94588, www.shaklee.com) was poured into a 24.0 cm (inner diameter) 4.7 l open metal nonstick-coated container (Mirro Corporation, Manitowc, WI 54220, USA) to a final depth of approximately 5 cm, and brought to 100o C (liquid to gas transition). No NaCl was added. Approximately 40 pieces each of S. Penne Rigate (San Giorgio, New World Pasta Co. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17112-6457, USA, www.sangiorgio.com, Figure 1, left) and B. Rigatoni (Barilla America, Inc, Lincolnshire, IL 60069, USA, www.barilla.com, Figure 1, right) were dropped into the boiling 100o C H2O. At approximately 5 minute intervals the mixture was stirred with a flat lignin paddle. At ~18 minutes the mixture was stirred a final time and then poured through a rigid plastic netting (square holes, sizes 3mm x 4mm and 4mm x 4mm) to capture the final products.


Figure 1: dry pasta.

Results

Figure 2 shows a randomly collected sample from the native 100o C H2O environment in which several Penne Rigate are inserted into Rigatoni. The sample pasta are suspended on the flat lignin paddle. No particular selection was made to obtain this sample which contains 5 Rigatoni and 6 Penne Rigate. Three (60%) of the Rigatoni contain Penne Rigate inserts. Note that a portion of the environment can be observed on the right side of the image as a white froth containing gas enclosed sphericals. It is impossible to observe the pasta through this froth without disturbing the environment. There is some evidence for ordered patterning of the environment in which the pasta are oriented vertically, but this was destroyed by stirring. Note that the H2O depth is substantially the same as the length of the two kinds of pasta.


Figure 2: sample of pasta freshly captured from its native environment (background froth).

Figure 3 shows the final captured population in which 4 N. doubleous are visible. It is thought that conditions were no longer authentic al dente at the end of the experiment and the violence of the trawling capture probably disturbed the neophytes. This could account for the reduced number of observed N. doubleous compared to the rapid sampling shown in Figure 2.


Figure 3: captured population sample.

As shown in Figure 4, boiled Penne Rigate (length ~5.0 cm, outer diameter 1.0 cm) can just barely fit inside boiled Rigatoni (length ~5.3 cm, inner diameter 1.3 cm) with a clearance of perhaps 0.15 cm. Under the turbulent thermal conditions sliding one pasta tube into the other should be strongly disfavored. No differences were observed between these samples and any others taken from the environment.


Figure 4: Components of Noodleous doubleous. From left to right: dry Penne Rigate; dry Rigatoni; example Penne Rigate sampled at 18 minutes; example Rigatoni sampled at 18 minutes; example Penne Rigate inserted into Rigatoni to create N. doubleous sampled at 18 minutes.

To examine the internal organs, an N. doubleous was dissected (Figure 5). We note that the two sub-species fit together closely. The tissue of Penne Rigate is notably lighter than that of Rigatoni. Also evident was the smooth interior wall of Rigatoni.


Figure 5: Dissection of Noodleous doubleous.

To confirm the observation the experiment was repeated at a later date. In an attempt to observe internal conditions the environment was gently removed from the heat source without stirring or sloshing. Although this allows the environment to cool, it is likely that the configuration of the pasta is approximately that in the natural environment. Figure 6 documents two related phenomena. First, Rigatoni are frequently oriented vertically while many Penne Rigate are oriented horizontally or at 45o to the vertical. Second, bubble plumes emerge from the dorsal end of Rigatoni tubes.

The environment was re-attached to the heat source and allowed to normalize. It was then removed again for inspection. Numerous N. doubleous were observed (Figure 7).


Figure 7: N. doubleous observed in heat-source detached environment.

A calculation was performed to determine the probability of the observed insertion events (Table 1).



Discussion

This paper reports an observation of spontanoodlus generation in which Penne Rigate inserts within Rigatoni to create a new species dubbed Noodleous doubleous.

The Vertical Flow Hypothesis proposes that Rigatoni become vertically oriented in the convective flow of phase transitioning liquid H2O, thereby increasing the heat dissipation rate. This proposal is supported by the observation of bubble plumes on the dorsal side of Rigatoni (Figure 6). It is feasible that horizontally oriented Penne Rigate that are close to the bottom of the environment are drawn upward into the ventral side of Rigatoni. The Penne Rigate are not fully ejected through the Rigatoni because the dorsal end of the Rigatoni is close to the liquid surface and the process does not have enough energy to lift the Penne Rigate into the environmental froth. The Penne Rigate would therefore be caught inside the Rigatoni.

However, the probability of an insertion event as proposed by the Vertical Flow Hypothesis is calculated to be extremely low (Table 1), so we are forced to conclude that the process was guided by some form of external intelligence. The experimenter was not responsible for this scalding task. The high temperature liquid was undergoing a rapid phase transition and liquid Dihydrogen Monoxide is extremely dangerous. Given these extreme sterilizing conditions, no known life forms could have survived immersion. We therefore conclude that this supernatural insertion process was done by the Hand of God.

Conclusion

Although it is considered unethical to destroy incipient life-forms, thereby causing them to go extinct, the experimenter was hungry, so he ate them anyway.

Notes added in proof

H2O is also known as Dihydrogen Monoxide, an extremely dangerous substance. It was responsible for the destruction of the city of New Orleans in 2005. See careful research of the Dihydrogen Monoxide Research Division, www.dhmo.org, for further information.

A viable hypothesis is that a divine Noodly Appendage of the Flying Spaghetti Monster was responsible for the effect. These results are therefore strong empirical in support of Flying Spaghetti Monsterism.

References

1. Flying Spaghetti Monster by Bobby Henderson

2. Flying Spaghetti Monster at Wikipedia

3. www.dhmo.org

4. The AND-Multiplication Error We didn't make this mistake. No, never.

5. Commentary at:
The Panda's Thumb
www.metafilter.com

6. Google: "Noodleous doubleous"

7. To dig deeper, see this scientific paper:T. D. Schneider,Evolution of Biological Information Nucleic Acids Res, 28: 2794-2799, 2000.

8. This article (with slight modifications)was published inThe Darwin Awards Book 4by Wendy Northcutt.

This page was originally at http://www.fred.net/tds/noodles/noodle.html

Comments 1 - 50 of 51 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #205427 by Logicel on July 7, 2008 at 9:06 am

 avatarHas the Al Dente Inquisition approved of this research?

Just think, this 'scholarly' research puts to shame anything that the IDiots are doing.

Other Comments by Logicel

2. Comment #205429 by Dax on July 7, 2008 at 9:08 am

 avatarAh, Scientific Evidence for FSM-ID... we should start teaching FSM-ID in science class! Better then just plain Discovery Institute ID!

Other Comments by Dax

3. Comment #205430 by Logicel on July 7, 2008 at 9:09 am

 avatarLook how thoughtful the FSM is, obviously designing the Rigatoni to allow for Penne insertion. Makes me hungry just realizing this merciful and bountiful generosity of the FSM.

Other Comments by Logicel

4. Comment #205432 by Tezcatlipoca on July 7, 2008 at 9:10 am

 avatarWhere's the butter and parmesan?

Other Comments by Tezcatlipoca

5. Comment #205434 by Logicel on July 7, 2008 at 9:12 am

 avatarTEACH THE CONTROVERSY! FSM-ID must be taught in all science classrooms.

RAmen.

Other Comments by Logicel

6. Comment #205443 by epeeist on July 7, 2008 at 9:19 am

 avatarBut who designed the machine that made the pasta, that's what I want to know!

(and where can you get an attachment for an Imperia pasta machine to make penne and rigatoni?)

Other Comments by epeeist

7. Comment #205445 by Noodly on July 7, 2008 at 9:27 am

 avatarThis confirms my suspicions!

Other Comments by Noodly

8. Comment #205447 by irate_atheist on July 7, 2008 at 9:30 am

 avatar6. Comment #205443 by epeeist -
(and where can you get an attachment for an Imperia pasta machine to make penne and rigatoni?)
From my extensive enquiries, the straight answer appears to be that you can't. Bummer.

Other Comments by irate_atheist

9. Comment #205449 by rasman1978 on July 7, 2008 at 9:33 am

 avatarThis is pretty solid proof.

MHNATY, Dr. Schneider and Dr. Frederick!

Other Comments by rasman1978

10. Comment #205450 by gcdavis on July 7, 2008 at 9:33 am

 avatarAnd for first course a delicious bowl of Primordial soup

Other Comments by gcdavis

11. Comment #205453 by Notcrowingbutyawning on July 7, 2008 at 9:39 am

 avatarPlagarism. This study was first carried out by the University of Durum, England, 1997. That's left you with egg on yer face hasn't it, laddie? Read 'em and wheat.

Other Comments by Notcrowingbutyawning

12. Comment #205457 by catskill on July 7, 2008 at 9:48 am

 avatarThis... is... awesome!!

Other Comments by catskill

13. Comment #205461 by Steve Zara on July 7, 2008 at 9:55 am

 avatarWhat amazes me are pasta shells. What are they shells for?

Other Comments by Steve Zara

14. Comment #205464 by Notcrowingbutyawning on July 7, 2008 at 10:03 am

 avatarComment #205461 by Steve Zara

They hide the invisible souls of the departed, Steve. When a pasta shell opens it liberates a dead person's essence unto the lord, which is like real cool, y'know. So, saith the FSM, always particularly enjoy your tuna and sweetcorn for thereby lies the path to eternal life wot wiv it being low fat and all that.

Other Comments by Notcrowingbutyawning

15. Comment #205468 by rod-the-farmer on July 7, 2008 at 10:17 am

 avatarNow if someone could only relate angel hair pasta, (note the connection with heavenly bodies) to string theory, we would have everything solved. It could even fit into a GUT.

Other Comments by rod-the-farmer

16. Comment #205470 by rod-the-farmer on July 7, 2008 at 10:19 am

 avatarI propose to test this myself, using locally available source material. No theory is secure unless & until other experimenters can duplicate the results.

Other Comments by rod-the-farmer

17. Comment #205471 by Elles on July 7, 2008 at 10:20 am

 avatarOMFSM, no! Proof of Intelligent Design will undermine Big Science! To maintain Nazi Germany we must EXPEL him!!!!!!!!

Other Comments by Elles

18. Comment #205472 by Apathy personified on July 7, 2008 at 10:23 am

 avatarJust for info,
Is a pasta bake ok, or would it be considered heresy?

Other Comments by Apathy personified

19. Comment #205474 by Tezcatlipoca on July 7, 2008 at 10:32 am

 avatarPasta bake or no? Thus schisms are riven from his noodly firmament

Other Comments by Tezcatlipoca

20. Comment #205482 by room101 on July 7, 2008 at 11:02 am

Yes, Mark Mathis' should produce a movie that puts a stop to this conspiracy:

"Farfalle'd - no rigate allowed"

Other Comments by room101

21. Comment #205485 by AmericanGodless on July 7, 2008 at 11:05 am

 avatarThis is obvious creationist nonsense. The authors did not even consider the possibility that the pasta is undergoing evolution as a response to extreme conditions (immersion in a universal solvent at phase-transition temperatures). Is it not obvious that the observed insertion is the first step in an early form of sexual reproduction? They did not even check for the presence of offspring. The overly-large pore size of the rigid plastic netting (square holes, sizes 3mm x 4mm and 4mm x 4mm) consigned any progeny from this brave evolutionary attempt to oblivion. This research needs to be repeated, and served with garlic toast and a green salad.

Other Comments by AmericanGodless

22. Comment #205486 by Notcrowingbutyawning on July 7, 2008 at 11:09 am

 avatarEsteemed prophet Bert O'Lucci did say on the subject of the Hindu scripture The Rig Atoni that there is a divine spirali of taut alini, similar to the cundalini but not really, that linguini forever until the end of the German day i.e. the Tag, and at the end of that day, in a Yorkshire dialect it will inform you of the secret... literally... The Tag'll Tell 'ee.

So it is written, was it not?

Other Comments by Notcrowingbutyawning

23. Comment #205494 by WilliamP on July 7, 2008 at 11:18 am

Yes! I just got a $50,000 grant from Liberty University to replicate the experiment. That's just about enough to properly equip my laboratory. I'll post the results here if they pass peer review for the Journal of Design Science.

Maybe I can use the results as the topic for my associate's thesis in Intelligent Design.

Other Comments by WilliamP

24. Comment #205496 by snoov on July 7, 2008 at 11:25 am

'substantially the same'

giggled my ass of at that

although maybe people do say that, do they?

Other Comments by snoov

25. Comment #205501 by Wosret on July 7, 2008 at 11:29 am

 avatarClearly the event is too unlikely without noodly-guidance.

Other Comments by Wosret

26. Comment #205508 by Notcrowingbutyawning on July 7, 2008 at 11:46 am

 avatar25. Comment #205501 by Mitchell Gilks

Some would baulk at the term 'noodly' preferring instead to invoke the Pastagnostic mechanism of 'Cos Cause', rendered into modern English as CousCous. In the noodly, or tentaculate, perception the intervention is slithery whilst the Pastagnostic interpretation, accepted by all civilized folk, is more of a shotgun blast of truth.

You are left to decide for yourself, but make sure you decide right, ok?

Other Comments by Notcrowingbutyawning

27. Comment #205559 by Am I Evil? on July 7, 2008 at 12:58 pm

 avatarCheckmate, atheists! :D

Other Comments by Am I Evil?

28. Comment #205571 by Buddha on July 7, 2008 at 1:11 pm

 avatarWell it convinced me. Schneider and Frederick are inspirational to-martyrs for the cause.

Shiver me timbers!

Other Comments by Buddha

29. Comment #205572 by stereoroid on July 7, 2008 at 1:11 pm

 avatarOne of the most basic laws in the universe is the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This states that as time goes by, entropy in an environment will increase. Evolution argues differently against a law that is accepted EVERYWHERE BY EVERYONE. Evolution says that we started out simple, and over time became more complex. That just isn't possible: UNLESS there is a giant outside source of energy supplying the Pot with huge amounts of energy. If there were such a source, scientists would certainly know about it.

Other Comments by stereoroid

30. Comment #205581 by 8teist on July 7, 2008 at 1:20 pm

 avatarHa......but where is the antipasta???????????

Other Comments by 8teist

31. Comment #205614 by HitbLade on July 7, 2008 at 2:07 pm

This is just bad science, the pasta is not even of the same brand! Shame on you!

Other Comments by HitbLade

32. Comment #205633 by onanyes on July 7, 2008 at 2:43 pm

UNLESS there is a giant outside source of energy supplying the Pot with huge amounts of energy. If there were such a source, scientists would certainly know about it.
-------
Uh, maybe the sun? :-)

Other Comments by onanyes

33. Comment #205655 by contrarian on July 7, 2008 at 3:36 pm

Shall we now eat pasta and drink tomato sauce as the body and blood of the Pasta Lord?

I'm not pagan... no, it just SOUNDS like I am.

Other Comments by contrarian

34. Comment #205673 by Border Collie on July 7, 2008 at 4:05 pm

 avatarHow do the Italians feel about this research? I've heard that there is a group of Islamists who are already planning a lawsuit.

Other Comments by Border Collie

35. Comment #205674 by Notcrowingbutyawning on July 7, 2008 at 4:06 pm

 avatar34. Comment #205655 by contrarian

Consider ye all the ultimate Italian insult... 'Your mother makes a poor marinara sauce'

Does this not, by inversion, remind us of the sanctity of womanhood as it is truly the She who did bring forth the son of FSM come to earth as a satisfying plateful? For is it not written alphabeti-spaghettily?

Peace and blessings be upon you and whilst adoring your women, make sure they damn well give you cause to, otherwise beat them with impunity for it is written.

Other Comments by Notcrowingbutyawning

36. Comment #205688 by Wosret on July 7, 2008 at 4:40 pm

 avatarLet up all remember the great words of the last prophet of the FSM: Ettore Boiardi. RAmen.

Other Comments by Wosret

37. Comment #205717 by aquilacane on July 7, 2008 at 5:53 pm

 avatarI hear the Pastafarians are organizing a huge antipasto rally tonight.

Other Comments by aquilacane

38. Comment #205718 by flobear on July 7, 2008 at 5:59 pm

 avatarSeeing one species of pasta tightly embraced within the pocket of another makes me feel all funny inside. I... don't know if it's.... right.

Other Comments by flobear

39. Comment #205762 by framante on July 7, 2008 at 7:06 pm

 avatarNoodleous doubleous is an abomination. It s contrary to God's law. Read the bible. This research should be banned.

Other Comments by framante

40. Comment #205808 by Laurie Fraser on July 7, 2008 at 7:50 pm

 avatar
Is it not obvious that the observed insertion is the first step in an early form of sexual reproduction?


I've heard that a common Pastafarian pick-up line is "May I insert my penne into your rigatone?"

Other Comments by Laurie Fraser

41. Comment #205892 by skybri on July 7, 2008 at 8:48 pm

 avatar....Godspeed in Louisiana, sir...

Other Comments by skybri

42. Comment #205897 by Rational_G on July 7, 2008 at 8:54 pm

 avatarWhat?

No mention of angel hair?

Atheist conspiracy !!!

EDIT: Rod-the-Farmer beat me to the angel hair reference.

Other Comments by Rational_G

43. Comment #205907 by Rational_G on July 7, 2008 at 9:31 pm

 avatar8teist:

Most of the antipasta was annihilated during "The First Three Minutes" of boiling......

Obviously there was slightly more pasta than antipasta at the beginning.

I believe if the pasta is subjected to many more minutes of boiling it will start producing gluons.

Other Comments by Rational_G

44. Comment #205908 by flistr8 on July 7, 2008 at 9:33 pm

 avatarNoodleous doubleous - food for the soul

Other Comments by flistr8

45. Comment #205912 by Laurie Fraser on July 7, 2008 at 9:56 pm

 avatarRational_G

ROFL...best comment of the day!

Other Comments by Laurie Fraser

46. Comment #205913 by Rational_G on July 7, 2008 at 10:04 pm

 avatarLF:

Thanks. I can only aspire to the high standards set here.

Other Comments by Rational_G

47. Comment #205915 by Macropus on July 7, 2008 at 10:13 pm

Gourmet who fly to London without Hong Kong stopover must be off his noodle!

If you can make sense of any of this you're a better man than I am, Gunga Din.

Other Comments by Macropus

48. Comment #206082 by serendipity1 on July 8, 2008 at 4:49 am

But where are the transitional pasta forms?

Other Comments by serendipity1

49. Comment #206538 by Misha Vargas on July 8, 2008 at 12:55 pm

 avatarThis is wonderful, more evidence to support our faith. We Pastafarians are secure in the knowledge that our lives have a solid moral FOUNDATION, PASTA, the very BASE of the food pyramid, AS ADMITTED BY THE USDA!!!

Other Comments by Misha Vargas

50. Comment #206702 by Geoff on July 8, 2008 at 5:03 pm

 avatar
Conclusion

Although it is considered unethical to destroy incipient life-forms, thereby causing them to go extinct, the experimenter was hungry, so he ate them anyway.


Brilliant.

It's worth noting here that Dr. Thomas D. Schneider is a real person, and a genuine research biologist too.

http://www-lmmb.ncifcrf.gov/~toms/schneider.html

There's an ongoing "debate" in the fora with a cretinist who is misrepresenting Schneider's data from an earlier published paper:

http://richarddawkins.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=50132&start=0

And Dr. Schneider has contributed to the thread.

Other Comments by Geoff
Reload Comments | Back to Top

More Comments: 1 2 | Next | Last

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: