Creationism call divides Royal Society
By ROBIN MCKIE, THE OBSERVER
Added: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:00:00 UTC
9-16-08: UPDATES from Richard here and here
Reposted from:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/sep/14/religion
Two Nobel prize winners - Sir Harry Kroto and Sir Richard Roberts - have demanded that the Royal Society sack its education director, Professor Michael Reiss. The call, backed by other senior Royal Society fellows, follows Reiss's controversial claim last week that creationism be taught in schools' science classes.
Reiss, an ordained Church of England minister, has since alleged he was misquoted. Nevertheless, several Royal Society fellows say his religious views make him an inappropriate choice for the post.
'I warned the president of the Royal Society that his [Reiss] was a dangerous appointment a year ago. I did not realise just how dangerous it would turn out to be,' said Kroto, a Royal Society fellow, and winner of the 1996 Nobel Prize for Chemistry.
Roberts, winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize for Medicine for his work on gene-splicing, was equally angry. 'I think it is outrageous that this man is suggesting that creationism should be discussed in a science classroom. It is an incredible idea and I am drafting a letter to other Nobel laureates - which would be sent to the Royal Society - to ask that Reiss be made to stand down.'
Zoologist Richard Dawkins, a Royal Society fellow, said: 'A clergyman in charge of education for the country's leading scientific organisation - it's a Monty Python sketch.'
A spokesman for the Royal Society rejected the principle that it was inappropriate for a clergyman to hold a senior post at the organisation. 'Michael Reiss's views are completely in keeping with those of the Royal Society,' he said.
The row over Reiss's remarks is the second recent controversy over the society's stance on religion. Fellows, including cancer expert and Nobel Prize winner Sir Paul Nurse, complained about the financial links that had been established between the society and the Templeton Foundation, a conservative US organisation that seeks to establish links between science and religion. The latter funded a lecture course at the society.
Many fellows fear the society, the world's oldest scientific organisation, is failing to take a sufficiently robust stance against the spread of fundamental religions which oppose scientific teachings about the origins of the Earth and humanity. 'The thing the Royal Society does not appreciate is the true nature of the forces arrayed against it and the Enlightenment for which the Royal Society should be the last champion,' Kroto said.
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Creationist School Bill Looks Doomed in...
Jeffrey Mervis - Science 35 Comments
Legislators in Indiana appear to have fallen short of their goal of injecting creationism into U.S. public schools.
News flash: American Protestant...
Jerry Coyne - Why Evolution Is True 42 Comments
News flash: American Protestant ministers overwhelmingly reject evolution, are split on Earth’s age
Why Do So Many Have Trouble Believing...
Marcelo Gleiser - npr 90 Comments
Sometimes the fossil record comes with teeth: Mapusaurus roseae on display in the "Dinosaurs of Gondwana" exhibit in 2009 at the National Museum of Nature and Science in Tokyo.
Junko Kimura/Getty Images
Richard Dawkins celebrates a victory...
Jamie Doward - The Guardian 90 Comments

Free schools that teach 'intelligent design'
as science will lose funding
What Would the World Look Like if the...
Casey Luskin - Evolution News and... 46 Comments

What Would the World Look Like if the New Atheists Won the Day?
MORE BY ROBIN MCKIE, THE OBSERVER
Our scientists must nail the...
Robin McKie, The Observer 85 Comments
Robin McKie, The Observer 408 Comments
Beggars belief: Robin McKie on The God...
Robin McKie, The Observer 71 Comments




















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page