Hubble directly observes planet orbiting Fomalhaut
2. Comment #283857 by BlazingArrow74 on November 14, 2008 at 12:30 am
3. Comment #283860 by Dr Doctor on November 14, 2008 at 12:36 am
4. Comment #283861 by Degsy on November 14, 2008 at 12:36 am
Jaw-dropping stuff. I was wondering if anyone would know where to, or how to get hold of a poster-sized image of this sort of thing?5. Comment #283865 by Dr Doctor on November 14, 2008 at 12:41 am
6. Comment #283866 by Quetzalcoatl on November 14, 2008 at 12:41 am
7. Comment #283870 by Dr Doctor on November 14, 2008 at 12:49 am
8. Comment #283875 by Quetzalcoatl on November 14, 2008 at 1:00 am
9. Comment #283878 by GandalfGrey on November 14, 2008 at 1:08 am
10. Comment #283882 by CaptainMandate on November 14, 2008 at 1:21 am
Having seen that, can anyone religous truly claim a monopoly on beauty and awe'
11. Comment #283884 by Disbelief on November 14, 2008 at 1:30 am
12. Comment #283885 by Laurie Fraser on November 14, 2008 at 1:35 am
13. Comment #283900 by Vaal on November 14, 2008 at 1:49 am
14. Comment #283901 by Laurie Fraser on November 14, 2008 at 1:51 am
15. Comment #283919 by Osmano on November 14, 2008 at 2:35 am
16. Comment #283920 by Quetzalcoatl on November 14, 2008 at 2:37 am
17. Comment #283924 by Brian English on November 14, 2008 at 2:42 am
18. Comment #283934 by friendlypig on November 14, 2008 at 3:04 am
19. Comment #283938 by Geraint on November 14, 2008 at 3:08 am
I wonder if it's coincidence that this came out at the same time as the images of the planetary system round HR8799.20. Comment #283942 by Osmano on November 14, 2008 at 3:13 am
21. Comment #283944 by Vaal on November 14, 2008 at 3:14 am
Because beyond curiosity these things don't have much value
22. Comment #283952 by Quetzalcoatl on November 14, 2008 at 3:21 am
23. Comment #283953 by Brian English on November 14, 2008 at 3:24 am
The thirst for knowledge is of course what makes us human, this needs to be balanced with social responsibility.False dichotomy. As I pointed out before, we are very irresponsible with spending on pork-barelling, welfare for the rich, wars, and whatever. The amount spent on science research is miniscule in comparison. But you'd like us to believe that we have to balance social responsibility on the back of science research. How about stop phony wars on drugs and awful wars on countries like Iraq? The money saved would easily fix social responsibility and leave plenty of change for science.
24. Comment #283958 by Greyman on November 14, 2008 at 3:29 am
19. Comment #283938 by Geraint on November 14, 2008 at 3:08 am
I wonder if it's coincidence that this came out at the same time as the images of the planetary system round HR8799.
Possibly not. Once the instrumentation and techniques has reached the point of being able to detect these things if you look in the rigth place, it then becomes a question of: just how common is the right place to look?
25. Comment #283960 by Osmano on November 14, 2008 at 3:33 am
26. Comment #283961 by Vaal on November 14, 2008 at 3:35 am
27. Comment #283963 by Brian English on November 14, 2008 at 3:39 am
Just because we're being wasteful there doesn't count as an argument for Spaceflight.Doesn't count against spaceflight either. You were trying to equate spaceflight as being wasteful in comparison to social responsibility. That argument will only fly when we're being lean and mean in all other areas that aren't as useful as science. Which we are not.
28. Comment #283967 by Quetzalcoatl on November 14, 2008 at 3:44 am
29. Comment #283971 by Osmano on November 14, 2008 at 3:48 am
30. Comment #283973 by Vaal on November 14, 2008 at 3:52 am
31. Comment #283974 by Quetzalcoatl on November 14, 2008 at 3:53 am
32. Comment #283978 by Osmano on November 14, 2008 at 4:02 am
33. Comment #283983 by Quetzalcoatl on November 14, 2008 at 4:08 am
34. Comment #283985 by Geraint on November 14, 2008 at 4:16 am
Greyman:
19. Comment #283938 by Geraint on November 14, 2008 at 3:08 am
I wonder if it's coincidence that this came out at the same time as the images of the planetary system round HR8799.
Possibly not. Once the instrumentation and techniques has reached the point of being able to detect these things if you look in the rigth place, it then becomes a question of: just how common is the right place to look?
35. Comment #283989 by The Schuermannator on November 14, 2008 at 4:23 am
36. Comment #284005 by neorenaissance on November 14, 2008 at 5:02 am
to Geraint,37. Comment #284007 by Geraint on November 14, 2008 at 5:08 am
Ah, OK. I guess there was an embargo until that issue came out.38. Comment #284032 by Lucas on November 14, 2008 at 6:43 am
39. Comment #284047 by Don_Quix on November 14, 2008 at 7:09 am
40. Comment #284077 by Lucas on November 14, 2008 at 8:52 am
41. Comment #284082 by astronomer24 on November 14, 2008 at 9:26 am
42. Comment #284087 by Steve Zara on November 14, 2008 at 10:08 am
Comment #284082 by astronomer2443. Comment #284094 by j.mills on November 14, 2008 at 10:34 am
44. Comment #284111 by weavehole on November 14, 2008 at 11:23 am
Skill!45. Comment #284248 by A on November 14, 2008 at 6:14 pm
I can't believe I am the first to notice that we have found the Eye of Sauron ! (from The Lord of The Rings)46. Comment #284251 by Dr Doctor on November 14, 2008 at 6:30 pm
I can't believe I am the first to notice that we have found the Eye of Sauron ! (from The Lord of The Rings)
47. Comment #284511 by j.mills on November 15, 2008 at 11:08 am
Selling names of celestial bodies would be both arrogant and immoral.
The IAU is not and will not be in this business.
48. Comment #284517 by scottishgeologist on November 15, 2008 at 11:23 am
Excellent news. How can anyone not be awestruck and motivated by cutting-edge science. How paltry and absurd is the default "Goddit" position. What small minds and microscopic world views
49. Comment #284747 by comet halley on November 15, 2008 at 6:16 pm
Looks like the 'Lonely star of Autumn' is not so lonely.50. Comment #284954 by bluebird on November 16, 2008 at 9:35 am
This article is reposted from a website that accepts comments.
Why not share your comment on the article there as well? CLICK HERE
1. Comment #283849 by Kit Finn on November 14, 2008 at 12:07 am
Other Comments by Kit Finn