To be Read at my Funeral
By RICHARD DAWKINS
Added: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:00:00 UTC
"I want to feel my sense of awe sparked, want to be captivated, want to be reminded of the breathtaking fortune of living in such an interesting universe." That was Anthony Doerr in his Boston Globe review. The God Delusion, as he rightly said, doesn't achieve this. To do so, it would have to be a different book. It might be called Unweaving the Rainbow. In fact it was.
Doerr's words reminded me that I once put together a brief extract from Unweaving the Rainbow, with the thought that it might be suitable for reading at funerals - including my own when the time comes.
"We are going to die, and that makes us the lucky ones. Most people are never going to die because they are never going to be born. The potential people who could have been here in my place but who will in fact never see the light of day outnumber the sand grains of Sahara. Certainly those unborn ghosts include greater poets than Keats, scientists greater than Newton. We know this because the set of possible people allowed by our DNA so massively outnumbers the set of actual people. In the teeth of these stupefying odds it is you and I, in our ordinariness, that are here.
Here is another respect in which we are lucky. The universe is older than 100 million centuries. Within a comparable time the sun will swell to a red giant and engulf the earth. Every century of hundreds of millions has been in its time, or will be when its time comes, 'the present century.' The present moves from the past to the future, like a tiny spotlight, inching its way along a gigantic ruler of time. Everything behind the spotlight is in darkness, the darkness of the dead past. Everything ahead of the spotlight is in the darkness of the unknown future. The odds of your century's being the one in the spotlight are the same as the odds that a penny, tossed down at random, will land on a particular ant crawling somewhere along the road from New York to San Francisco. You are lucky to be alive and so am I.
We live on a planet that is all but perfect for our kind of life: not too warm and not too cold, basking in kindly sunshine, softly watered; a gently spinning, green and gold harvest-festival of a planet. Yes, and alas, there are deserts and slums; there is starvation and racking misery to be found. But take a look at the competition. Compared with most planets this is paradise, and parts of Earth are still paradise by any standards. What are the odds that a planet picked at random will have these complaisant properties? Even the most optimistic calculation will put it at less than one in a million.
Imagine a spaceship full of sleeping explorers, deep-frozen would-be colonists of some distant world. Perhaps the ship is on a forlorn mission to save the species before an unstoppable comet, like the one that killed the dinosaurs, hits the home planet. The voyagers go into the deep-freeze soberly reckoning the odds against their spaceship's ever chancing upon a planet friendly to life. If one in a million planets is suitable at best, and it takes centuries to travel from each star to the next, the spaceship is pathetically unlikely to find a tolerable, let alone safe, haven for its sleeping cargo.
But imagine that the ship's robot pilot turns out to be unthinkably lucky. After millions of years the ship does find a planet capable of sustaining life: a planet of equable temperature, bathed in warm starshine, refreshed by oxygen and water. The passengers, Rip van Winkles, wake stumbling into the light. After a million years of sleep, here is a whole new fertile globe, a lush planet of warm pastures, sparkling streams and waterfalls, a world bountiful with creatures, darting through alien green felicity. Our travellers walk entranced, stupefied, unable to believe their unaccustomed senses or their luck.
As I said, the story asks for too much luck; it would never happen. And yet, isn't it what has happened to each one of us? We have woken after hundreds of millions of years asleep, defying astronomical odds. Admittedly we didn't arrive by spaceship, we arrived by being born, and we didn't burst conscious into the world but accumulated awareness gradually through babyhood. The fact that we gradually apprehend our world, rather than suddenly discovering it, should not subtract from its wonder."
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Richard Dawkins - Prospect 37 Comments
Richard Dawkins's review of The Social Conquest of Earth, by Edward O Wilson (WW Norton, £18.99, May)
“Why Are You Atheists So Angry?” To Be...
Greta Christina - Greta Christina's... 11 Comments
“Why Are You Atheists So Angry?” To Be Published By Pitchstone!
Book Review: Freedom of Religion & The...
Bruce Everett - Rousing Departures 11 Comments
Book Review: Freedom of Religion & The Secular State
Herb Silverman champions atheism with...
Will Moredock - Charleston City Paper 10 Comments
Russel Blackford reviews Attack of the...
Russell Blackford - Metamagician and... 24 Comments
Currently reading - Attack of the Theocrats by Sean Faircloth
Three articles by Steven Pinker,...
- - Religion and Ethics 40 Comments
Three articles by Steven Pinker, Russell Blackford and John Gray
MORE BY RICHARD DAWKINS
Richard Dawkins - Prospect 37 Comments
Richard Dawkins's review of The Social Conquest of Earth, by Edward O Wilson (WW Norton, £18.99, May)
No blood on the carpet. How...
Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 173 Comments
[Journalists] seem to feel let down when they discover that the real people aren't anything like the way they so relentlessly portray us; as if, since they've gone to the trouble of inventing extravagant caricatures of us, we should at least have the decency to live up to them in real life.
Also in Polish
UPDATED: Why I want all our children to...
Richard Dawkins - The Observer 179 Comments
Whatever else the Bible might be – and it really is a great work of literature – it is not a moral book and young people need to learn that important fact because they are very frequently told the opposite.
Richard Dawkins speaks on Reason Rally
Richard Dawkins - Washington Post 21 Comments
Richard Dawkins speaking to Sally Quinn about the Reason Rally
Who would rally against reason? [Also...
Richard Dawkins - Washington Post On... 49 Comments
Even if you are unaccustomed to living by reason, if you are one of those, perhaps, who actively distrust reason, why not give it a try? Cast aside the prejudices of upbringing and habit, and come along anyway. (Also translated into Polish)
IN FULL: Atheist in memory lapse and...
Richard Dawkins - New Statesman 18 Comments
Following a week of attacks, the evolutionary biologist responds to his critics – and argues Britain must not make policy by following “Census Christians” who can’t name the first book of the New Testament.



















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page