Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Thursday, March 5, 2009 | Reason : In the News | print version Print | Comments |

Document To Save a Mockingbird

by Richard Dawkins

UPDATE: 3-23-09

Several people have expressed regret that they cannot come to Lalla’s exhibition in London and bid for her fabric pictures and ceramic paintings, in aid of the Gerald Durrell Fund for Galapagos conservation.

I am therefore offering to place bids on behalf of anybody in the world who wants to buy any of Lalla’s pictures.

The system is a silent auction. People who visit the gallery are invited to place written bids, on paper, in a box. Each bid includes the bidder’s name and address, the name of the picture they want to buy, and the price they are prepared to pay, in pounds sterling. The bid must be in pounds, for comparability with other bids, but when it comes to payment we can accept the dollar equivalent.

For the benefit of those who cannot visit the gallery, I have set up a special email address for the sole purpose of receiving bids. On this site, if you click on a picture, an email to me is automatically generated. Please send me your bid and your name and address, and I'll drop it in the box for you.

The auction closes on Saturday 28th March at 5.30 pm GMT. When the auction closes, the bids for each picture will be examined, and the highest one accepted, provided it reaches the (undisclosed) reserve price set for that picture. No guide prices have been given, but I can say that the Gerald Durrell Foundation are hoping to make £30,000 (and the frame alone costs an average of £100 per picture, which I have paid as my personal contribution). Go figure, as they say!

Richard

Click here to view and bid on items in the FABRIC PICTURES gallery

Click here to view and bid on items in the CERAMIC PAINTINGS gallery




Click here to see a set of 40 postcards (PDF)
postcards


The myth-tormented imagination of the poet Yeats soared over the western horizon to a dream world of blissful islands, the Islands of the Blest, the Country of the Young. For Darwin and his heirs, the Galapagos Islands, 600 miles over the western horizon from South America, are the Islands of the Blest. It’s controversial whether Darwin’s visit to that remarkable archipelago really was the seminal experience of his life, but it should have been. If you were to set aside a few million years to design the ideal natural experiment to give the game away about evolution and spark the idea in the mind of a travelling naturalist, Galapagos is exactly what you would dream up. Imagination could not outperform this reality.

The key to the Galapagos islands is that they are young. All are volcanic, and none has ever been in contact with the mainland, so every endemic animal and plant has evolved there in extremely recent times. On the evolutionary timescale, Galapagos is the Country of the Young. Even the oldest of the islands (Espanola near the eastern end of the archipelago) is only just over three million years old, while the youngest (Fernandina, in the west) is probably less than half a million. It is no accident that the islands get younger as you move from south east to north west. The (also very young) theory of Plate Tectonics makes all clear. The Nazca Plate is moving, with a somewhat jerky and erratic course, in a south easterly direction towards South America, where it is slowly being subducted under the continental shelf. As it moves, it passes over a volcanic ‘hot spot’, which periodically punches through to raise a new volcano: in some cases a new island. Some of the islands have but a single large volcano. Isabela, the largest island, is a chain of five. Old islands are those that have been carried furthest away from the hot spot. Young ones, such as Fernandina and Isabela, are closest to the hot spot today: indeed, Fernandina is right above it. On the oldest island, Espanola, the single volcano is the last survivor of a previously larger island. There were even older islands that have now sunk out of sight altogether, as the plate inches its way under South America. The Nazca plate, with its volcanic hot spot underneath, serves as a conveyor belt for the manufacture and subsequent destruction of islands.

As I said, we know that every single animal and plant in the archipelago arrived recently (by geological standards, not by human standards, of course). You cannot say the same of Madagascar or New Zealand, which are fragments of the ancient continent of Gondwana. The faunas and floras of these primeval islands are a complicated mixture of Gondwanan originals together with the descendants of immigrants, which have had many tens of millions of years to go their separate evolutionary ways. Galapagos evolutions are not all as young as might be suggested by the approximately 3 million years of the oldest extant islands. This is because their evolutionary radiation could have begun on the now sunk older islands. But the maximum time available for the unique Galapagos fauna to have evolved is still very short. Continents and older islands like Madagascar have become palimpsests of history, the clarity of the story ravaged and distorted by time and repeated invasions of immigrants. But in Galapagos, we are privileged to see evolution in its burgeoning youth.

A young archipelago like Galapagos[1] is a natural laboratory of evolution, a bustling workshop for the manufacture of new species, again as if on a conveyor belt. Speciation is the name we give to the divergence of one ancestral species into two: Darwin’s ‘origin of species’ . For speciation to occur, there must be some initial separation – otherwise sexual cross-breeding will continually mix the gene pool of the original species with that of the budding new species, and prevent them from diverging. Sometimes the barrier is imposed from without, as when an earthquake, say, changes the course of a river so that it bisects the range of a previously united species. At other times the barrier is already there, wide enough to be difficult to cross but not totally impossible. This means that crossings occur just often enough to initiate speciation, but not so often as to allow enough sexual mixing (‘gene flow’) to stop the species diverging. Archipelagoes are speciation factories, and Galapagos is the pick of the bunch.

Speciation requires an optimal spacing of islands, not too far and not too close. The actual magnitude of the optimal distance will depend on the mobility of the animals concerned. To a wide ranging bird like a tropicbird, the whole archipelago might as well be a single continent. To a Galapagos finch, the 600 mile distance to the mainland constitutes a major barrier, which was bridged perhaps only once. The distances between individual islands – of the order of tens of miles rather than hundreds – are just small enough to allow occasional island-hops, but too large to allow gene swamping. These are ideal conditions for speciation. Galapagos might have been designed for the origin of species.

Darwin, in The Voyage of the Beagle, enunciated the principle in a dawning of recognition:

Seeing this gradation and diversity of structure in one small, intimately related group of birds, one might really fancy that from an original paucity of birds in this archipelago, one species had been taken and modified for different ends.


Darwin was here speaking of the finches that now bear his name, but he was first alerted to the principle by the Floreana mockingbird. He had already noticed, on San Cristobal, that the local mockingbirds resembled those on the mainland but were nevertheless different. The next island the Beagle visited was Floreana, and that was where Darwin’s penny dropped. The Floreana mockingbird was different again. And then other islands turned out to have their own species of mockingbird. The same is true of the giant tortoises, of the lava lizards, and of many of the plant species.

But the Floreana mockingbird was Darwin’s epiphany. It is of great significance in the history of ideas, and it is one of the most endangered species in the world. The extinction of any species is a tragedy. The plight of the Floreana mockingbird – inspiration of Darwin’s youth – moved Lalla Ward to accede to the Durrell Foundation’s suggestion that she should prepare a special exhibition on the theme of – and in aid of – Galapagos wildlife.

Lalla’s talents are extraordinarily versatile. Although best-known as an actress (companion to the definitive Doctor Who, Tom Baker; Ophelia to Derek Jacobi’s Hamlet in the BBC television production, and many other roles in the theatre, cinema and television) she has always been an artist at the same time, and here too her versatility seems boundless. She drew the cartoons for a series of popular books by the celebrated vet, Bruce Fogel. She has illustrated books of comic verse (by Lance Percival) and written her own comic verse to enhance her own books of knitting designs. She secured the contract to produce the Shell Calendar of seabirds in 1985, and chose to do it in a peculiarly difficult and labour-intensive style: embroidery. This prestigious commission won her another one the following year, to produce a calendar for the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, again using embroidery: a delightful series of twelve bird pictures, seasonally evocative of the months of the year. While working on these commissions, she found books on embroidery so far from lucid that she was moved to write her own instruction manual. This she published as Lalla Ward’s Countryside Embroidery Book, illustrated with her own delightful pictures from the RSPB Calendar.

Since I have known her, she has branched out into mosaics, silk painting (I shall be wearing my Galapagos tie for the Private View on March 26th), and ceramic paintings, which form a part of this exhibition. When I first got to know Lalla, all these talents impressed me hugely. But I was drawn even more to her enormously wide reading, even in my own subject of evolutionary biology. How many actresses or artists can say that they read The Origin of Species at the age of 15, and then went on to read a large modern literature on evolutionary biology because of a fascinated desire to find out whether Darwin was still taken seriously (he is)? Almost all her art nowadays is centred on animals, and her knowledge of them and their evolution shines through.

Most recently, and perhaps most excitingly, she has taken up freehand drawing with the needle of a sewing machine, and painting with a palette of fabrics. It is these remarkable pictures, a juxtaposition of fine drawings with thread on abstract mosaics of cloth, that dominate the Durrell Galapagos exhibition. I think these fabric pictures are her most exciting work to date. They have been produced in a frenzy of artistic energy. For me, they capture the spirit of Galapagos in a unique way that does justice to the archipelago’s own distinctive strangeness. Although she refreshed her memory with photographs, she has seen all these animals at first hand, on two trips that we made to the islands together, including an especially memorable one as the guest of Victoria Getty on a small boat called The Beagle. These fabric pictures place the animals and plants of Galapagos, exquisitely drawn with a fine needle, in abstract landscapes created using the textures and colours of her fabrics, in a way that is uniquely evocative of these enchanted islands.

Also see:
http://richarddawkins.net/article,3666,Evolving-glory-of-the-Galapagos,The-Independent

The Gerald Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust is mounting an exhibition of art by

Lalla Ward

Inspired by the wildlife of Galapagos.

Chris Beetles Gallery, 8-10 Ryder Street, London SW1Y 6QB

The Exhibition will be open from 21-28 March
10.00 to 17.30 Monday to Saturday

Pictures will be sold in aid of the Durrell Conservation Trust


1. Or Hawaii, although that archipelago has been ruined by human introductions.


Photographs by Nicholas Kettlewell

Click to enlarge
Land iguana


Click to enlarge
Land iguana


Click to enlarge
Land iguana


Click to enlarge
Land iguana


Click to enlarge
Land iguana


Click to enlarge
Land iguana


Click to enlarge
Land iguana


Click to enlarge
Land iguana


Click to enlarge
Land iguana


Click to enlarge
Land iguana

Comments 1 - 50 of 92 | | View Alternate Comment Thread

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #349412 by Frankus1122 on March 5, 2009 at 8:38 pm

 avatarVery cool art.


Edit:

Galapagos might have been designed for the origin of species.


Richard Dawkins, you are a funny man.

Other Comments by Frankus1122

2. Comment #349414 by Frankus1122 on March 5, 2009 at 8:55 pm

 avatarBirdwatching at the Equator




The blue-footed booby

stands on tropic island

in the Galapagos Group

stands all day long

shading her eggs from the sun

also protecting her blue feet

from too much ultraviolet

Sometimes the male booby

flaps his wings and dances

to entertain his mate

pointing his toes upward

so they can discuss blueness

which seems to them very beautiful

Their only real enemy

is the piratical frigate bird

floating on great black wings

above the mile-long island

Sometimes the frigate bird

robs them of their fish

whereupon the booby

is wont to say “Friggit”

and catches some more

When night comes all the boobies

sit down at once as if

God has given them a signal

or else one booby says

to the rest “Let’s flop boys”

and they do




The booby’s own capsule

comment about evolution:

if God won’t do it for you

do it yourself:

stand up

sit down

make love

have some babies

catch fish

dance sometimes

admire your feet

friggit:

what else is there?



--Al Purdy, 1981.

Other Comments by Frankus1122

3. Comment #349418 by Fuzzy Duck on March 5, 2009 at 10:23 pm

 avatarHawaii is such a bizarre place, ecologically. Almost nothing is native there and it's remarkably obvious. Everything is from the North American mainland or Japan or Australia or neighboring parts of Polynesia. I was lucky to see a few wild honeycreepers.

Very nice artwork, and to a good cause, as well.

-Kevin

Other Comments by Fuzzy Duck

4. Comment #349422 by zpiff on March 5, 2009 at 10:35 pm

 avatarClearly homo erectus is still walking among us this very day..

Other Comments by zpiff

5. Comment #349423 by Jake Sigren on March 5, 2009 at 10:36 pm

 avatarLoved the article but the pictures aren't loading for me, I will check back again later. Thanks again for the wonderful writing Richard, I really enjoyed the plate techtonics information about the formation of the galapagos.

Yay! The pics loaded! It's all very wonderful art and I particularly liked the pelican silhouette.

Other Comments by Jake Sigren

6. Comment #349424 by Cartomancer on March 5, 2009 at 10:46 pm

 avatarPerhaps even Lalla's prodigious talents would not serve to render the extraordinary stylistic ugliness of Big Bang's posts above beautiful. I am imagining a work in fabrics depicting the extraordinarily rich speciation factory of the internet, which seems almost designed to produce a diversity of unpleasant flora and fauna of negligible intellectual value. In particular, a picture of this guy crouched under a bridge eating inquisitive billy-goats...

However, though Lalla's needle might not suffice, I'm sure Josh's scissors would address the problem most appropriately. Sometimes we make the world more beautiful by preserving things or creating them, sometimes we just need to take the ugly things away...

Other Comments by Cartomancer

7. Comment #349431 by beanson on March 5, 2009 at 11:18 pm

 avatar
companion to the definitive Doctor Who


Yes, of course- who's David Tennant?

Awesome applique by the way!!!!

Other Comments by beanson

8. Comment #349433 by stephstrand on March 5, 2009 at 11:58 pm

 avatarLovely article and magnificent work!
Freehand drawing with a needle and thread, my goodness ... Such a thing has never occurred to me. (I've been too well schooled in the pencil-paper approach, perhaps.)

Anyway, these pieces are thoroughly impressive and evocative. What a beautiful tribute to a beautiful subject.

Other Comments by stephstrand

9. Comment #349435 by Butler on March 6, 2009 at 12:20 am

 avatarIt is marvelous how well Richard's and Lalla's respective talents complement each other.

Richard, is Lalla contributing any art to tGSoE?

Other Comments by Butler

10. Comment #349437 by Fidgaf on March 6, 2009 at 12:27 am

No pictures :(

Links may be broken.

Other Comments by Fidgaf

11. Comment #349440 by Jane Tomlinson on March 6, 2009 at 12:58 am

 avatarWow, those are beautiful pictures, Richard. Lalla is an exceptionally talented artist - she has captured not only the way the creatures look, but their character and behaviour too. As a wildlife artist myself I know that's tough enough to do in paint, let alone in applique!

I stick to paint, : here's my gallery of 'living things' which for the past couple of years especially, has been inspired by Darwin and Wallace.

Jane,
Oxford

Other Comments by Jane Tomlinson

12. Comment #349442 by Quetzalcoatl on March 6, 2009 at 1:03 am

 avatarFor those like me who can't see the pictures, simply right-click on them, select "save target as" and download them to your computers. You should be able to open them then.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

13. Comment #349443 by gcdavis on March 6, 2009 at 1:18 am

 avatarNice plug for the old lady Richard but I too cannot see the images (Google Chrome/XP)

Other Comments by gcdavis

14. Comment #349444 by Shuggy on March 6, 2009 at 1:18 am

 avatarRichard Dawkins, as everyone knows, is strident, dogmatic and wrong! I refer of course to his claim that Tom Baker is the "definitive" Doctor. Everyone knows that Patrick Troughton is. Or Christopher Eccleston.

Other Comments by Shuggy

15. Comment #349445 by Absinthius on March 6, 2009 at 1:20 am

 avatarIs it possibly to stop this big bang moron from tainting elegant topics like this? (Or rather topics altogether) I am in principle against censorship, but this empty repeating of the same nonsense in the immature language that he uses.. its just ruining the atmosphere.

Perhaps I am a transitional form of the forum-age or something.. but when something is written in caps I still perceive it as either very loudly emphasized or yelled. Even in mature discussion, without censorship, someone who constantly yells the same nonsensical non-arguments and preaches from their deluded lecture should be warded and eventually banned.

I'm getting tired of this guy and frankly he is ruining the nice atmosphere these kind of forum-topics should be enveloped in.

Oh and indeed a great article and those pictures are exquisite!

Other Comments by Absinthius

16. Comment #349448 by Quetzalcoatl on March 6, 2009 at 1:25 am

 avatargcdavis-

Try what I said in comment 13.

Absinthius-

It's the growing consensus now that Big Bang should be ignored. In other words, no responses to his comments, no talking about him not to him when he's around. The troll thrives on the attention, and doesn't seem to care that it's universally negative. The only solution is just to hit the troll button on his spammy posts, and just ignore them otherwise.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

17. Comment #349450 by bachfiend on March 6, 2009 at 1:54 am

New Zealand is arguably an older version of the Galapagos Islands. It is thought that after Gondwana broke up, New Zealand was completely submerged and was then reformed as the Australasian and Pacific plates collided about 30 million years ago. Before humans arrived on the scene (only about 1500 years ago for the Maoris and less than 200 years ago for the Europeans), New Zealand was a pretty unique place, with birds occupying most the ecological niches occupied by mammals elsewhere. There were only 2 land mammals, both bats.

Other Comments by bachfiend

18. Comment #349454 by Enlightenme.. on March 6, 2009 at 2:26 am

 avatar^Suggest leave 20 up for now, if you wish to speak to JM/BB you can post in the alt thread.

Other Comments by Enlightenme..

19. Comment #349456 by Anvil on March 6, 2009 at 2:30 am

 avatarYeah, love the Booby piece. I so wish I was a Fat Wallet.

By the way did anyone spot that 'The Selfish Gene' came in at Number Ten (with 6%) in a list of books that people had most commonly lied about reading. The Holey Babble came in 4th with 24%:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts_and_culture/7925720.stm

And that:

48% admitted to buying a book for someone else and reading it first.


Ha! I have done this so many times.

Anvil.

ps: apologies for the OT.

Other Comments by Anvil

20. Comment #349457 by Nails on March 6, 2009 at 2:32 am

 avatar20. Comment #349451 by beanson on March 6, 2009 at 2:01 am

I would appeal to everyone not just to [troll] the troll but also [troll] all posts that mention it (including this one)

sorry Nails and Antheist but you've been hit (along with all others)

No probs, I realise that my comment wasn't for the average RD.net user, just for the irrational.
In fact, I would support your proposal.

Saves the thread for rational discussion.

Other Comments by Nails

21. Comment #349459 by Kiwi on March 6, 2009 at 2:50 am

I see there is Mockingbird2, is there a Mockingbird1 ?

Other Comments by Kiwi

22. Comment #349461 by rod-the-farmer on March 6, 2009 at 3:05 am

 avatarIn imaginary conversations with evolution-deniers, I use the following...

"Are you aware of exactly how Darwin came up with the theory of evolution ? During a sea voyage of many months, he traveled down the east coast of S. America, then up the west cost, stopping off at many places, sometimes for several weeks, to observe the many different kinds of native plants and animals. He collected hundreds of specimens, and notably, at the Galapagos islands, isolated by 600 miles from the west coast of S. America. On his return to England, he consulted with nature specialists, and thought long and hard about what he had seen and the specimens he had collected. Only after some thought did he arrive at his theory of evolution, and it was 10 years before he published his book 'On the Origin of Species'.

Now that we have a short description of what HE went through to come up with HIS theory of evolution, perhaps you could describe all the travels YOU made, the specimens YOU gathered, and the specialists YOU consulted before coming up with your claim that HIS theory is wrong."

I figure that will help shut them up. And if I can do that in front of an audience, it might help them see the weakness in claims from the deniers.

Other Comments by rod-the-farmer

23. Comment #349462 by Tyler Durden on March 6, 2009 at 3:14 am

 avatarComment #349461 by rod-the-farmer

Superb!

I can imagine a "Yeah, but..." response, while they slowly walk away defeated.

Other Comments by Tyler Durden

24. Comment #349463 by Mark Jones on March 6, 2009 at 3:23 am

 avatarGreat pictures! The pelican silhouette one is particularly effective IMO.

Other Comments by Mark Jones

25. Comment #349466 by Brian English on March 6, 2009 at 4:06 am

 avatarThis site is difficult to use now days. Who put all the comments on the same page? Especially on a thread with heaps of large images that must be downloaded?

Other Comments by Brian English

26. Comment #349471 by sbooder on March 6, 2009 at 4:35 am

 avatarI miss all the fun, who is big bang? Can I treat him/her bad?

Let me at em...

Other Comments by sbooder

27. Comment #349473 by archfarchnad on March 6, 2009 at 4:45 am

 avatarBreathtaking artwork! The flamingoes would look great on my wall, but I don't suppose these are for sale. Still, it is wonderful to see that Richard and Lalla's devotion to the same cause produces such diverse and captivating results. Keep up the good work the pair of you (and Jon Pertwee was the best Dr Who by the way)!

Other Comments by archfarchnad

28. Comment #349475 by rod-the-farmer on March 6, 2009 at 4:49 am

 avatarI LIKE all the comments on one page. It makes it possible, now, to search for a phrase or word in comments for one article. Before, you had to do multiple searches, one for each page of comments. But loading all the images will happen on every page, will it not, so that should make it faster even for those with dial up ?

Other Comments by rod-the-farmer

29. Comment #349478 by Brian English on March 6, 2009 at 4:55 am

 avatarWell, I just posted on the 'godless guru' thread and that took several minutes to load and I've got broadband. You can have it Rod. :)

Other Comments by Brian English

30. Comment #349479 by sbooder on March 6, 2009 at 4:58 am

 avatarI should say that Tom Baker is the best Dr Who, based on the fact he is my unofficial god father (oh the irony), When I say unofficial, when I was born he got very drunk with my father and they fell down the stairs in my fathers pub. Anyway the upshot was, my father asked Tom Baker if he would be my god father, and he agreed. That was the last we saw of Tom Baker, although he did live in my home town of Sandwich for a while and I used to see him around the shops, but I never plucked the courage up to approach him.

Anyway, saying all that, I am a John Pertwee fan as Dr Who, Tom Baker coming in a close second and Sylvester McCoy bringing up the rear behind all the rest (including Peter Cushing in the films).

By the way am I the only person who cannot see the images on this page?

Other Comments by sbooder

31. Comment #349488 by phasmagigas on March 6, 2009 at 5:53 am

 avatarim not getting the images either.

fuzzy duck

Hawaii is such a bizarre place, ecologically. Almost nothing is native there and it's remarkably obvious. Everything is from the North American mainland or Japan or Australia or neighboring parts of Polynesia. I was lucky to see a few wild honeycreepers.


a similar situation is seen in many parts of new zealand, its interesting to see some disturbed land with a few stands of just a few species, in this case plants that seem to have an easy time outcompeting the natives, i guess this is a feature of initial colonisation with big stands of few species and only when they start to brush against each other does a more interesting war for resources occur.

Other Comments by phasmagigas

32. Comment #349493 by phasmagigas on March 6, 2009 at 5:56 am

 avatarquetz

For those like me who can't see the pictures, simply right-click on them, select "save target as" and download them to your computers. You should be able to open them then.


yup, that works, thanks.

yes, nice work there.

(EDIT: since i down loaded one the images are now viewable, coincidence maybe'')

Other Comments by phasmagigas

33. Comment #349494 by Jiten on March 6, 2009 at 5:57 am

 avatarBeautiful prints. I wish one day to be able to visit the Galapagos too.

Other Comments by Jiten

34. Comment #349496 by phasmagigas on March 6, 2009 at 6:02 am

 avataryes, i like those pieces, the contrast between teh organic animals and the cloth blocks is nice.

I get this incredible feeling that some of them would be perfect on an episode of bagpuss, something that starts as inanimate and then of course comes to life!!


for those not familiar with bagpuss it is singlehandedly the most charming and ingenious kids TV show made, somebody here has him as an avatar (the pink striped cat).

Other Comments by phasmagigas

35. Comment #349537 by gcdavis on March 6, 2009 at 7:08 am

 avatarNow visible! Thanks Josh and very nice they are too.

Other Comments by gcdavis

36. Comment #349571 by AisforAtheist on March 6, 2009 at 8:19 am

 avatarI often surf while listening to a text-to-speech rendition of a wonderful article like this.

In preference over the Mac OSX "Alex" voice, it would be very nice to select a "Richard" voice!

... or better yet, a wider choice of voices of progressive thinkers, including:
- The Four Horsemen;
- E.O. Wilson
- Susan Blackmore
- Carolyn Porco
- etc.

What other names should we add to our wish list of T2S voices?

How would we go about mounting such an effort?

Other Comments by AisforAtheist

37. Comment #349589 by Fuzzy Duck on March 6, 2009 at 9:21 am

 avatarphasmagigas,

I agree. I mentioned Hawaii because that's the example I've visited, but New Zealand is a mess of invasive species, as well. I remember when I was about 10 years old, and I read this (wonderfully illustrated) book about these children who go on a little nature excursion through some forests, fields, and beaches in New Zealand. I was somewhat mortified to see a bunch of stoats, rabbits, deer, and invasive flowering weeds, and no kiwis, kakopos, etc. At least it was an honest book.

Other Comments by Fuzzy Duck

38. Comment #349591 by Galapagos on March 6, 2009 at 9:26 am

Such beautiful artwork! Lalla Ward must be a very talented individual! I'd never seen any of here work before..

Other Comments by Galapagos

39. Comment #349593 by Titania on March 6, 2009 at 9:35 am

 avatarI love Lalla's artwork. Any chance she would auction some pieces to benefit the Richard Dawkins Foundation?

I would bid!

Other Comments by Titania

40. Comment #349594 by bluebird on March 6, 2009 at 9:38 am

 avatarA lovely pas de deux of text & visual art; thanks for sharing this!!

Other Comments by bluebird

41. Comment #349601 by Gregg Townsend on March 6, 2009 at 9:55 am

 avatarWow, just wow. The turtle would look great on the wall of my front room next to the Wyland ink sketch of a sea turtle :)

-edit- 40. Comment #349593 by Titania

I also would be interested in bidding.

Other Comments by Gregg Townsend

42. Comment #349616 by markg on March 6, 2009 at 10:30 am

 avatar
Most recently, and perhaps most excitingly, she has taken up freehand drawing with the needle of a sewing machine, and painting with a palette of fabrics.


That's quite impressive and the artwork is beautiful. It's also nice to hear more about an artist/actress involved and educated in science and rationalism, instead of the seemingly usual nonsense such as scientology.

Other Comments by markg

43. Comment #349627 by Hellene on March 6, 2009 at 10:52 am

For those who might not know of Gerald Durrell;

http://www.durrellwildlife.org/index.cfm?a=7

Other Comments by Hellene

44. Comment #349630 by Annamation on March 6, 2009 at 11:04 am

 avatarBeautiful art work.

Other Comments by Annamation

45. Comment #349677 by Stafford Gordon on March 6, 2009 at 1:13 pm

The vivid splashes of primary colours in these works of art capture the fundamental beauty of nature; I'm broke, but I'll try to see the exhibition.

That Dawkins bloke can write as well.

Other Comments by Stafford Gordon

46. Comment #349768 by aquilacane on March 6, 2009 at 10:34 pm

 avatarFor anyone who likes wildlife images but can't afford her work, simply make a donation to The Gerald Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust and I will gladly send you a copy of this pathetic bastard, absolutely free.


Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Other Comments by aquilacane

47. Comment #349783 by Clairebear on March 7, 2009 at 1:08 am

 avatarOh man, the art is so cute, it made me feel rather nostalgic.

Can't believe a fifth of people like reading Sophie Kinsella. I can't think of anything more insipid than 'confessions of a shopoholic'

Other Comments by Clairebear

48. Comment #349787 by jimcarson on March 7, 2009 at 1:41 am

 avatar
The extinction of any species is a tragedy.

WHAT? Please tell me Richard Dawkins did not just write that. That's a joke, yes?

The extinction of no species, including ours, is a tragedy.
Or Hawaii, although that archipelago has been ruined by human introductions.

Ruined? Ruined? Evolution changes everything all the time, and it is beautiful. But if humans make changes, it's ruinous?

Sounds more like ugly political correctness than beautiful understanding of the world as it is.

Other Comments by jimcarson

49. Comment #349790 by Bernstein on March 7, 2009 at 2:09 am

Comment #349787 by jimcarson
Ruined? Ruined? Evolution changes everything all the time, and it is beautiful. But if humans make changes, it's ruinous?

Sounds more like ugly political correctness than beautiful understanding of the world as it is.


Not if you consider humans and the things they do to be "unnatural".

Other Comments by Bernstein

50. Comment #349793 by jimcarson on March 7, 2009 at 2:41 am

 avatar
Not if you consider humans and the things they do to be "unnatural".

Which is very easy to do, if you're a creationist fundie. For learned realists like Dawkins, it would require extraordinary cognitive dissonance.

Other Comments by jimcarson
Reload Comments | Back to Top

More Comments: 1 2 | Next | Last

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: