New Scientist flips the bird at scientists, again
By PZ MYERS, JERRY COYNE
Added: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:00:00 UTC
New Scientist continues to mislead the public by using their "Darwin was wrong" cover in promotions. 
Jerry Coyne's blog:
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/the-new-scientist-has-no-shame-again/
When New Scientist published its âDarwin was WRONGâ cover a few months ago, several of us wrote in to complain about the distortion of Darwinâs work. (The cover referred to how gene transfer might blur the branches of phylogenetic trees, something that Darwin had no inkling of.) The editor, Roger Highfield, appeared to be chastened. Since then, the cover has been waved about by creationists in the US to show that evolution really is on the skids.
Well, apparently Roger Highfield is not repentant: he has used that cover AGAIN in advertising his rag (see below). The man has no shame; this is obviously a deliberate decision, and one he approved. Letter writing doesnât seem to have sufficed — perhaps itâs time to boycott New Scientist.
PZ Myers' Pharyngula:
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/03/new_scientist_flips_the_bird_a.php
We've been through this before. When New Scientist ran their misleading "Darwin was wrong" cover, we hammered at them and pointed out that they were doing us no favors — they were giving ammunition to creationists who would never read the contents, but would wave that cover at school board meetings. And they did. We chastised the editor, Roger Highfield, and we had the impression that he was penitent, but it turns out we were completely wrong.
New Scientist is now using that same cover again in their promotional material to flog magazines. Yes, that is their business, to sell magazines…but this represents a declaration that they think their market is the ignorant creationist segment of wanna-be pretend scientists. That's a real shame.
Jerry Coyne calls for a boycott. I have to agree. If they don't want fans of real science to read their magazine, then we won't. I also won't hesitate to tell young people interested in science that they shouldn't waste their time with New Scientist — pick up Seed instead, or even Discover, if you're a bit déclassé. But sorry, NS is joining the Weekly World News as yet another rag pandering to the gullible.
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
The living fossils of brain evolution
- - PhysOrg.com 2 Comments
(Phys.org) -- In the course of its evolution, the architecture of the mouse brain may have barely changed. Similar to the tiny ancestors of modern mammals that lived about 80 million years ago, nerve cells in the mouse visual cortex are densely packed in a small area of the brain. However, during the subsequent evolution of larger brains the architecture of the cerebral cortex was radically restructured. This is the conclusion of an international team of researchers led by scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, the University of Göttingen and the Bernstein Center Göttingen. The brains of larger mammals, such as humans, however, have a completely different structure to those of mice. Processes of self-organisation led to the emergence of modules in which neurons conjointly are responsible for specific tasks.
Human Evolution Isn't What It Used to Be
Matt Ridley - Wall Street Journal... 9 Comments
Recent analyses of the human genome reveal a huge number of rare—and therefore probably fairly new—mutations.
Richard Dawkins - Prospect 35 Comments
Richard Dawkins's review of The Social Conquest of Earth, by Edward O Wilson (WW Norton, £18.99, May)
Ancient walking mystery deepens
Helen Briggs - BBC News - Science &... 7 Comments
One of the first creatures to step on land could not have walked on four legs, 3D computer models show.
Human Races May Have Biological...
Razib Khan - The Crux - Discover... 89 Comments
Human Races May Have Biological Meaning, But Races Mean Nothing About Humanity
Darwinian Selection Continues to...
- - ScienceDaily 45 Comments
New evidence proves humans are continuing to evolve and that significant natural and sexual selection is still taking place in our species in the modern world.
RSS Feeds
Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page