Does religion have greater 'epistemic authority' than science in some areas?
By JERRY COYNE - WHY EVOLUTION IS TRUE
Added: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:00:00 UTC
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/does-religion-have-greater-epistemic-competence-than-science-in-some-areas/
Take a look at this article from Naturalism.org; itâs about the misguided notion that in some areas faith can give us genuine answers to questions before which science is impotent. This is the NOMA refrain that we hear constantly from organizations like the National Academy of Sciences, the National Center for Science Education,and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Are there âways of knowingâ that are not only unique to faith, but provide real answers about the nature of the universe? I have long thought that this notion is completely misguided, a conclusion reached in the article. A snippet:
A popular rationale for such respect is that science and religion donât conflict since science canât evaluate religious claims about the supernatural; itâs only concerned with the natural, material world. This suggests that religions have epistemic authority when it comes to the supernatural. Some recent statements about the relationship of science and religion make this point:
Science is recognized internationally as the best way to find out about the natural world. But the natural world is not the only thing that human beings ask questions about…[M]ost people believe that there is a universe or world or something beyond or other than the material one, which is populated by gods, spirits, ancestors, or other non-material beings. Science doesnât tell us anything about this world; this transcendent world is the provenance of religion. – Eugenie C. Scott, Evolution vs. Creationism, p. 47, original emphasis.
Because science is limited to explaining the natural world by means of natural processes, it cannot use supernatural causation in its explanations. Similarly, science is precluded from making statements about supernatural forces because these are outside its provenance. Science has increased our knowledge because of this insistence on the search for natural causes. – National Science Teachers Association, in Teaching About Evolution and the Nature of Science p. 124
...
Continue reading and see more links in his post
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/does-religion-have-greater-epistemic-competence-than-science-in-some-areas/
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Moral Clarity and Richard Dawkins
Carson - Reasons for God 17 Comments
What kind of meta-ethical foundation has Dawkins provided for his ‘moral home’?
"Faith: Pretending to know things you...
Dr. Peter Boghossian - YouTube -... 22 Comments
"Faith: Pretending to know things you don't know"
Debate: Can Atheists and Believers work...
-- - Rationalist Society of Australia 45 Comments
A debate between Chris Stedman, PZ Myers, and Leslie Cannold from April 15, 2012.
Jerry Coyne - Why Evolution Is True 10 Comments
Conversion on Mount Improbable: How...
Mike Aus - RichardDawkins.net 77 Comments
Conversion on Mount Improbable: How Evolution Challenges Christian Dogma
UPDATED: Why I want all our children to...
Richard Dawkins - The Observer 159 Comments
Whatever else the Bible might be – and it really is a great work of literature – it is not a moral book and young people need to learn that important fact because they are very frequently told the opposite.
MORE BY JERRY COYNE
Jerry Coyne - Why Evolution Is True 10 Comments
Jerry Coyne - Why Evolution Is True 204 Comments
Robert Wright promotes accommodationism, disses Dawkins
Sean Faircloth talks about Catholicism...
Jerry Coyne - Why Evolution Is True 9 Comments
Sean Faircloth talks about Catholicism at Notre Dame
News flash: American Protestant...
Jerry Coyne - Why Evolution Is True 42 Comments
News flash: American Protestant ministers overwhelmingly reject evolution, are split on Earth’s age





















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page