Craig Venter - The Genius of Charles Darwin: The Uncut Interviews
2. Comment #392560 by Steve Zara on June 30, 2009 at 6:37 pm
What a fantastic opening statement, rejecting any "naturalist" agenda.3. Comment #392568 by HappyPrimate on June 30, 2009 at 7:16 pm
4. Comment #392569 by black wolf on June 30, 2009 at 7:39 pm
5. Comment #392571 by mybelle on June 30, 2009 at 7:56 pm
The exponential leaps in proficiency being made annually is staggering. This was quite interesting and enjoyable to watch.6. Comment #392578 by cfarach1 on June 30, 2009 at 9:21 pm
7. Comment #392580 by -ID62- on June 30, 2009 at 9:36 pm
Solara is right down the street from me here in Rockville MD. I didn't catch the location of the new facility. I know a man that worked for Venter for years in the non-profit arm called TIGR, the institute for genomic research. He ran the team that sequenced influenza, among others. Owen White is his name, and he is one of the most cited scientists in the world. Venter has really spawned a whole movement and a number of careers.8. Comment #392582 by Rational_G on June 30, 2009 at 10:04 pm
9. Comment #392584 by mordacious1 on June 30, 2009 at 10:12 pm
10. Comment #392586 by Scandinavian07 on June 30, 2009 at 10:21 pm
11. Comment #392588 by Alternative Carpark on June 30, 2009 at 10:46 pm
12. Comment #392590 by Gwiss on June 30, 2009 at 11:09 pm
This is fantastic.13. Comment #392592 by mordacious1 on June 30, 2009 at 11:25 pm
14. Comment #392593 by yyy on June 30, 2009 at 11:43 pm
One thing that seems kind of weird to me: it was mentioned that 2 individual humans share about 98% of their genes. I assume its about the same for lions, yet male lions sometimes kill cubs that don't belong to them. It would seem that the 98% of shared genes would exert selection pressure to *not* kill those cubs and even be altruistic toward them, rather than having a mere 2% exert all that influence. Maybe I'm not thinking about alleles correctly or something. I guess a father and cub share a lot more genes than 2 random unrelated individuals.15. Comment #392594 by righton on June 30, 2009 at 11:43 pm
Venter is great. His book is very inspirational.16. Comment #392599 by Dog Boots on July 1, 2009 at 12:43 am
That was great to watch!17. Comment #392605 by AllanW on July 1, 2009 at 1:19 am
18. Comment #392606 by chemical scum on July 1, 2009 at 1:21 am
lol, annoying security woman.19. Comment #392636 by Bernard Baptiste on July 1, 2009 at 3:04 am
Brilliant! Craig Ventner is great to listen to. He explains such complex ideas clearly and communicates his enthusiasm for his projects excellently. I can understand how those who believe in an imagined creator would be envious of our human capacity for real "intelligent design" and understanding of evolution's processes.20. Comment #392638 by black wolf on July 1, 2009 at 3:16 am
21. Comment #392639 by the great teapot on July 1, 2009 at 3:20 am
Comment 122. Comment #392644 by the great teapot on July 1, 2009 at 3:34 am
sarcasm button turned off.23. Comment #392648 by black wolf on July 1, 2009 at 4:02 am
24. Comment #392649 by the great teapot on July 1, 2009 at 4:04 am
I was pleased the director interrupted the conversation because there wasn't enough scene change going on.25. Comment #392653 by the great teapot on July 1, 2009 at 4:27 am
Flabbergasted.26. Comment #392655 by the great teapot on July 1, 2009 at 4:35 am
Why was the laundry room the only one protected by security controls?27. Comment #392657 by black wolf on July 1, 2009 at 4:55 am
28. Comment #392708 by Humanist Wikitopian on July 1, 2009 at 8:50 am
29. Comment #392724 by RightWingAtheist on July 1, 2009 at 11:34 am
30. Comment #392731 by rod-the-farmer on July 1, 2009 at 12:41 pm
31. Comment #392736 by Ygern on July 1, 2009 at 1:05 pm
32. Comment #392766 by Noe Sandoval on July 1, 2009 at 2:18 pm
Fascinating discussion.33. Comment #392772 by tantrangle on July 1, 2009 at 2:30 pm
I have a thought. It seems that science's Utilitarian world-view is just as arrogant and self-serving as any religion. Science subscribes to the same deification of humans as any religion. We are the one's who decide what to do with the knowledge we gain through science- and for the most part the products of science only serve to cure the ills of our toiling civilization. Armed with the belief that Humans are the only sentient beings (or any other animal that we decide: Save the Whales, but fuck anything that annoys us) on this planet. Science will do all it can to save a human life while at the same time the Utilitarian world-view has caused and is causing countless deaths (human and non-human) hell, we've build entire civilizations based on this believe. I'm not saying we must stop exploring, but why must we bend everything to serve ourselves? Have we become the gods now?34. Comment #392780 by TurkishAtheist on July 1, 2009 at 2:52 pm
36. Comment #392804 by thereisnodog on July 1, 2009 at 3:58 pm
37. Comment #392809 by jignle on July 1, 2009 at 4:09 pm
Tantrangle:38. Comment #392813 by Goldy on July 1, 2009 at 4:20 pm
39. Comment #392820 by Dya Z on July 1, 2009 at 5:13 pm
40. Comment #392828 by debacles on July 1, 2009 at 6:12 pm
41. Comment #392847 by BweWeston on July 1, 2009 at 8:52 pm
42. Comment #392849 by astronomer24 on July 1, 2009 at 10:37 pm
43. Comment #392852 by mordacious1 on July 1, 2009 at 11:04 pm
44. Comment #392854 by zengardener on July 1, 2009 at 11:33 pm
45. Comment #392865 by Ygern on July 2, 2009 at 2:13 am
46. Comment #392875 by Memebrain on July 2, 2009 at 3:22 am
It's funny how Venter seems to think that a theory is an imperfect fact, "Evolution is no longer a mere theory to me" (paraphrased).47. Comment #392877 by Roger Stanyard on July 2, 2009 at 3:33 am
I have a thought. It seems that science's Utilitarian world-view is just as arrogant and self-serving as any religion. Science subscribes to the same deification of humans as any religion. We are the one's who decide what to do with the knowledge we gain through science- and for the most part the products of science only serve to cure the ills of our toiling civilization. Armed with the belief that Humans are the only sentient beings (or any other animal that we decide: Save the Whales, but fuck anything that annoys us) on this planet. Science will do all it can to save a human life while at the same time the Utilitarian world-view has caused and is causing countless deaths (human and non-human) hell, we've build entire civilizations based on this believe. I'm not saying we must stop exploring, but why must we bend everything to serve ourselves? Have we become the gods now?
48. Comment #392883 by Humanist Wikitopian on July 2, 2009 at 4:20 am
49. Comment #392885 by Humanist Wikitopian on July 2, 2009 at 4:30 am
37. Comment #392809 by jignle: Your giving yourself too much credit. You haven't had a thought; your brain just took a dump.
50. Comment #392886 by Ygern on July 2, 2009 at 4:40 am
This article is reposted from a website that accepts comments.
Why not share your comment on the article there as well? CLICK HERE
1. Comment #392559 by Dave White on June 30, 2009 at 6:27 pm
I enjoy the doorman who comes out to shoo Dawkins and the film crew away in the first few seconds. It's actually a bit sad. I guess you have to appreciate his dedication to the job!Other Comments by Dave White