Religious schools 'undermine cohesion'2. Comment #396864 by Hellene on July 15, 2009 at 6:29 pm
"Instead of encouraging mass immigration into white countries"3. Comment #396868 by paceetrate on July 15, 2009 at 7:11 pm
4. Comment #396869 by mordacious1 on July 15, 2009 at 7:17 pm
5. Comment #396877 by TimB on July 15, 2009 at 8:37 pm
Nice that someone is actually writing an article on this.6. Comment #396878 by SmilingAtheist on July 15, 2009 at 8:38 pm
Instead of encouraging mass immigration into white countries and therefor helping to white out white people... it would be a better idea just to improve trade relations between all nations and make us all richer and raise our quality of life in all countries.
7. Comment #396879 by DeepFritz on July 15, 2009 at 8:40 pm
8. Comment #396882 by prolibertas on July 15, 2009 at 8:58 pm
'The rise of faith-based schools in Australia is restricting the ability of some students to relate to people of diverse backgrounds'.9. Comment #396897 by Alternative Carpark on July 15, 2009 at 11:05 pm
10. Comment #396898 by helenlibra on July 15, 2009 at 11:06 pm
If I understand the first post from Benjamin 28, then there is to be no movement of population. If you're born in India, you stay in India and so on. That being the case, should the early humans have stayed in Africa?11. Comment #396901 by Alternative Carpark on July 15, 2009 at 11:56 pm
12. Comment #396903 by Fil on July 16, 2009 at 12:11 am
13. Comment #396904 by ev-love on July 16, 2009 at 12:22 am
14. Comment #396906 by Sean on July 16, 2009 at 12:34 am
Comment #396897 by Alternative CarparkOn the other hand, if they are paying their taxes, not inconveniencing the rest of the population, and are happy with self-imposed isolation, then who are we to complain?
15. Comment #396908 by Quetzalcoatl on July 16, 2009 at 12:51 am
Keep britain british, europe european, africa african, china chinese, india indian.
Instead of encouraging mass immigration into white countries and therefor helping to white out white people... it would be a better idea just to improve trade relations between all nations and make us all richer and raise our quality of life in all countries.
Stupid do-gooder idiots
16. Comment #396911 by rod-the-farmer on July 16, 2009 at 12:59 am
17. Comment #396912 by Fil on July 16, 2009 at 1:05 am
18. Comment #396914 by mordacious1 on July 16, 2009 at 1:10 am
19. Comment #396915 by Fil on July 16, 2009 at 1:19 am
20. Comment #396916 by AllanW on July 16, 2009 at 1:49 am
21. Comment #396921 by CaptainMandate on July 16, 2009 at 2:14 am
white countries
22. Comment #396925 by Steve Page on July 16, 2009 at 2:33 am
Given that benjamin28's most popular thread is "Will white people become myths in the future?" http://richarddawkins.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=66514&sid=b16735fe39bd675252dc2833a54d792c , it more likely that he merely resembles a troll because of his backward inbred racist mindset. It is highly offensive, though, so I encourage everyone to click the button beneath his post.23. Comment #396926 by Steve Page on July 16, 2009 at 2:35 am
Ah, removing his post makes my comment somewhat redundant. As you were.24. Comment #396927 by Quetzalcoatl on July 16, 2009 at 2:40 am
25. Comment #396929 by Follow Peter Egan on July 16, 2009 at 2:42 am
26. Comment #396930 by mordacious1 on July 16, 2009 at 2:48 am
27. Comment #396932 by Quetzalcoatl on July 16, 2009 at 2:55 am
28. Comment #396934 by Anvil on July 16, 2009 at 3:01 am
29. Comment #396937 by mmurray on July 16, 2009 at 3:19 am
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or collaborative content community with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional or disciplinary response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.
30. Comment #396938 by mmurray on July 16, 2009 at 3:29 am
The sight of tall African women particularly, especially when dressed in traditional clothing, is a spectacular and very welcome sight on the otherwise all white streets of Hobart.
31. Comment #396939 by flying goose on July 16, 2009 at 3:36 am
What is my own intuitive response the questions I set. First a reminder of the questions.
Collective Worship in a C.E. V.C. Primary School.
Is it theologically possible or morally desirable?
At a recent clergy gathering I put these questions to colleagues. One responded saying that the questions seem already to assume the answer, no. This is indeed my intuitive response. My tutors responded to my initial essay proposal in the following way.
The context of assembles being in a faith school means that parents have chosen to place their children in a faith school and we wonder if this is important?
My response illustrates my own intuitive response to my question.
Firstly, in my thinking I had not considered the school to be a faith school in the current usage of this term. This is because parents in village do not choose the C of E school because it is a 'faith school', they choose it because it is the school in the village. Neither does the school select on the basis of denomination or any religious affiliation. I was recently told.
We are a community school, we put our arms around everyone.This from a school that had just achieved an Outstanding from its statutory church inspection.
It is the community school that historically was provided by the church, as a service to the community. Let us call it a church provided community school.
32. Comment #396942 by hungarianelephant on July 16, 2009 at 3:42 am
33. Comment #396945 by Fil on July 16, 2009 at 4:02 am
34. Comment #396952 by donttellhimpike on July 16, 2009 at 4:45 am
35. Comment #396953 by mmurray on July 16, 2009 at 4:49 am
"Trolling is a method of fishing where one or more fishing lines, baited with lures or bait fish, are drawn through the water. ..."
From Wikipedia mmurray..
As regards African women here in traditional dress in winter. You maybe have some stupid comment to make about Tasmania? Or shall we discuss the wonders that are Adelaide's weather? No mention yet of two heads, I see.
It was a comment made in admiration. Thank you for deflating it.
Obviously the immigrants from the terror that is Somalia or wherever have a hard time adapting to the climate and culture of Tasmania, but I truly admire their spirit (and in warmer months, their choice of dress).
This trend has become a tidal swell of good intentions by parents that is creating class divisions that this country was not based upon...and we as a nation are poorer for it.
36. Comment #396954 by mmurray on July 16, 2009 at 4:51 am
mmurray
I concur with Fil on that one. I go trolling in my canoe for pike. Trawling - I think means a net is involved (I'd never be able to tow one of those with my electric outboard! :-)
37. Comment #396958 by mmurray on July 16, 2009 at 5:05 am
Edited, because my original post was too reactive, proving that I am an old grump who is not having a very good year health wise and am truly sick of it (irony alert). :-(
Oh what the hell, the cricket's on, so go the baggy greens! (sorry, mmurray, my sincere apologies).
38. Comment #396960 by mmurray on July 16, 2009 at 5:08 am
Old boys networks are rife here in Tasmania
39. Comment #396968 by Fil on July 16, 2009 at 5:26 am
40. Comment #396973 by AllanW on July 16, 2009 at 5:39 am
Ah me, and so back to the cricket...
41. Comment #396975 by BillySands on July 16, 2009 at 5:41 am
42. Comment #396978 by Ignorant Amos on July 16, 2009 at 5:46 am
9. Comment #396897 by Alternative CarparkOn the other hand, if they are paying their taxes, not inconveniencing the rest of the population, and are happy with self-imposed isolation, then who are we to complain?
43. Comment #396980 by mmurray on July 16, 2009 at 5:47 am
44. Comment #396984 by Buchner on July 16, 2009 at 5:50 am
45. Comment #397027 by GregfromCanada on July 16, 2009 at 7:33 am
"Instead of encouraging mass immigration into white countries and therefor helping to white out white people... it would be a better idea just to improve trade relations between all nations and make us all richer and raise our quality of life in all countries."46. Comment #397033 by ev-love on July 16, 2009 at 7:42 am
47. Comment #397035 by GregfromCanada on July 16, 2009 at 7:45 am
Buy the way, although this guys message is offensive it is useful. Not because we have to agree but because it forms a basis for discussion and an opportunity to refute his bigoted ideas. He did not flame anyone and was nut "rude" in the sense that he used offensive or inflammatory language, only most of his ideas are morally bankrupt.48. Comment #397054 by Ignorant Amos on July 16, 2009 at 8:27 am
45. Comment #396984 by Buchner49. Comment #397062 by Buchner on July 16, 2009 at 8:37 am
50. Comment #397073 by Ignorant Amos on July 16, 2009 at 8:54 am
50. Comment #397062 by BuchnerI didn't ask for your personal prjudices, impressions and anecdotes, but for the evidence.
1. Comment #396861 by Fuller on July 15, 2009 at 5:41 pm
Yikes, thats high. And Rudd won't do anything about it because he made a campaign promise to not change the private school funding that Howard had installed.
Other Comments by Fuller