Libel laws silence scientists

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/sep/21/liberal-democrat-libel-richard-dawkins

It is a lamentable observation that because of the way our laws are skewed toward the plaintiff, London has become the libel capital of the world. Litigants are coming to England from another country to sue people who live in a third country over a book that was published in a fourth country – the excuse being that a handful of books were sold here too. A nice little round-the-world jaunt for lawyers it may be, but sensible or liberal it is not. Nor is it just.

Of course there must be redress if you are maliciously attacked in a way that damages you. But if such a law is cast too wide it has disastrous consequences on the public interest, not least in the area of science and medicine where the stakes are high, profits and reputations are guarded jealously, and the vulnerable need to be protected from unproven or fraudulent claims for cures, whether by "alternative" therapists or big pharmaceuticals.

As a scientist, and as Oxford's inaugural Professor of the Public Understanding of Science, I have sometimes wondered why science itself cannot sue for libel. You can legally lie about the real world to your heart's content, but until some human being is materially damaged, nobody will complain. Teachers can legally tell innocent children the palpable falsehood that the world is less than 10,000 years old (the true figure is more than 4.5 billion years). The world cannot sue you for lying about its age, because the world cannot prove that it has been damaged by the lie!
...
Continue reading
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/sep/21/liberal-democrat-libel-richard-dawkins

TAGGED: CAMPAIGNS, LAW, RICHARD DAWKINS


RELATED CONTENT

Should Churches Get Tax Breaks?

The Opinion Pages - The New York Times 58 Comments

Should Churches Get Tax Breaks?

Church Puts Legal Pressure on Abuse...

Laurie Goodstein - New York Times 31 Comments

William Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, a church advocacy group in New York, said targeting the network was justified because “SNAP is a menace to the Catholic Church.”

Marriage - two viewpoints

Russell Blackford & John Milbank -... 197 Comments

Marriage - two viewpoints

Free speech under fire

Jonathan Turley - Los Angeles Times 66 Comments


Free speech under fire

Afghan clerics' guidelines 'a green...

Emma Graham-Harrison - The Guardian 54 Comments

The clerics renounced the equality of men and women enshrined in the Afghan constitution, suggesting they consider the document that forms the basis of the Afghan state to be flawed from a religious perspective.

A Revolutionary Idea

Joe Nocera - The New York Times 20 Comments


A Revolutionary Idea

MORE

MORE BY RICHARD DAWKINS

No blood on the carpet. How...

Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 173 Comments

[Journalists] seem to feel let down when they discover that the real people aren't anything like the way they so relentlessly portray us; as if, since they've gone to the trouble of inventing extravagant caricatures of us, we should at least have the decency to live up to them in real life.
Also in Polish

UPDATED: Why I want all our children to...

Richard Dawkins - The Observer 160 Comments

Whatever else the Bible might be – and it really is a great work of literature – it is not a moral book and young people need to learn that important fact because they are very frequently told the opposite.

Richard Dawkins speaks on Reason Rally

Richard Dawkins - Washington Post 21 Comments

Richard Dawkins speaking to Sally Quinn about the Reason Rally

Who would rally against reason? [Also...

Richard Dawkins - Washington Post On... 49 Comments

Even if you are unaccustomed to living by reason, if you are one of those, perhaps, who actively distrust reason, why not give it a try? Cast aside the prejudices of upbringing and habit, and come along anyway. (Also translated into Polish)

IN FULL: Atheist in memory lapse and...

Richard Dawkins - New Statesman 18 Comments

Following a week of attacks, the evolutionary biologist responds to his critics – and argues Britain must not make policy by following “Census Christians” who can’t name the first book of the New Testament.

Atheist in Memory Lapse and Slavery...

Richard Dawkins - New Statesman 38 Comments

In modern Britain, not even Christians put Christianity anywhere near the heart of their lives, and they don't want it put at the heart of public life either. David Cameron and Baroness Warsi, please take note.

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment