A Raconteur of Nature's Back Story
By THE NEW YORK TIMES, SARAH LYALL
Added: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:00:00 UTC
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/books/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=1&8dpc&_r=1
LONDON — It wonât thrill his publishers to hear this, but Richard Dawkins appears largely uninterested in standard authorial topics like his new book, his writing habits or even himself. Instead he wants to talk about giant butterflies and tiny moths, worms disguised as snakes, why goats are related to whales and whether beetles have two sets of wings (they do, and for good reason).
What better place to do it than at the Darwin Center at the Natural History Museum here, a glossy new temple to the evolutionary process, or the âee-volutionary proh-cess,â as Mr. Dawkins pronounces it in his precise accent. In a sign of the felicitous juxtaposition of person and place, the man dispensing tickets at the front desk recognizes this shortish man with the chronically interested expression.
âMr. Dawkins?â he says, as pleased as if he had spotted Jacques Cousteau striding down the beach. âI love your books.â
If there were a celebrity of the evolutionary world, Mr. Dawkins would certainly be it. His best-selling books — including âThe Selfish Geneâ and âThe Blind Watchmaker,â laying out his case for a gene-centered view of evolution — have gone a long way toward making evolutionary biology accessible to a wide audience.
He lectures to sell-out audiences, receives standing ovations and regularly places in the Top 10 on Prospect magazineâs annual list of the worldâs 100 Top Public Intellectuals. His latest book, âThe Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolutionâ (Free Press), has been on the New York Times nonfiction best-seller list for three weeks.
Continue reading:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/books/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=1&8dpc&_r=1
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Moral Clarity and Richard Dawkins
Carson - Reasons for God 89 Comments
What kind of meta-ethical foundation has Dawkins provided for his ‘moral home’?
No blood on the carpet. How...
Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 173 Comments
[Journalists] seem to feel let down when they discover that the real people aren't anything like the way they so relentlessly portray us; as if, since they've gone to the trouble of inventing extravagant caricatures of us, we should at least have the decency to live up to them in real life.
Also in Polish
UPDATED: Why I want all our children to...
Richard Dawkins - The Observer 160 Comments
Whatever else the Bible might be – and it really is a great work of literature – it is not a moral book and young people need to learn that important fact because they are very frequently told the opposite.
Richard Dawkins - US October 2012 Tour
- - RichardDawkins.net 27 Comments
[Update - statement from CfI ]Secular...
Press Release - Center for Inquiry 88 Comments
Atheist group sues Rochester Hills country club over canceled speech
Richard Dawkins Has a Point, Your...
Michael J. Matt - The Remnant 147 Comments
In sum, according to Cardinal Pell: Man certainly did evolve from monkeys, Adam and Eve were not actual people, Genesis is a myth, atheists certainly go to heaven, and homosexuals, far from living a sinful lifestyle, are perfectly free to have unions (whatever that means!).
With friends like these running His Church why would God need enemies?



















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page