Dawkins et al bring us into disrepute
By MICHAEL RUSE - GUARDIAN.CO.UK
Added: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 UTC
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/nov/02/atheism-dawkins-ruse
As a professional philosopher my first question naturally is: "What or who is an atheist?" If you mean someone who absolutely and utterly does not believe there is any God or meaning then I doubt there are many in this group. Richard Dawkins denies being such a person. If you mean someone who agrees that logically there could be a god, but who doesn't think that the logical possibility is terribly likely, or at least not something that should keep us awake at night, then I guess a lot of us are atheists. But there is certainly a split, a schism, in our ranks. I am not whining (in fact I am rather proud) when I point out that a rather loud group of my fellow atheists, generally today known as the "new atheists", loathe and detest my thinking. Richard Dawkins has likened me to the pusillanimous appeaser at Munich, Neville Chamberlain. Jerry Coyne, author of Why Evolution is True, says (echoing Orwell) that only someone with pretensions to the intelligentsia could believe the silly things I believe. And energetic blogger PZ Myers refers to me as a "clueless gobshite" because I confessed to seeing why true believers might find the Kentucky Creationist Museum convincing. I will spare you what my fellow philosopher Dan Dennett has to say about me.
There are several reasons why we atheists are squabbling – I will speak only for myself but I doubt I am atypical. First, non-believer though I may be, I do not think (as do the new atheists) that all religion is necessarily evil and corrupting. This claim is on a par with golden plates in upstate New York. The Quakers and the Evangelicals were inspired and driven by their religion to oppose slavery, and a good thing too. Of course there has been evil in the name of religion – the pope telling Africans not to use condoms in the face of Aids – but as often as not religion is not the only or even the primary force for evil. The troubles in Northern Ireland were surely about socio-economic issues also, and the young men who flew into the World Trade Centre towers were infected by the alienation and despair of the young in Muslim countries in the face of poverty and inequalities.
...
Continue reading
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/nov/02/atheism-dawkins-ruse
_______________________________________________________________
[UPDATE] PZ and Jerry Coyne post comments on this as well
Schisms, rifts, and apologia for insanity
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/11/schisms_rifts_and_apologia_for.php
Ruse gibbers on...
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/ruse-gibbers-on/
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Secular Guidelines to Moral Living: A...
Jeff Schweitzer - Huffington Post 35 Comments
So, in honor of Hitchens I propose here guidelines to how we can make those daily decisions, a secular distillation of moral behavior derived from those characteristics that define us as human.
The atheist who tried to steal Christmas
Larry Taunton - USA Today 70 Comments
Christmas is, after all, the season of magic, and lest children confuse sugar plum fairies and flying reindeer with the observable and repeatable, the professor has loaded neither toys nor goodies on his sleigh but a heavy dose of "rational skepticism."
Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 89 Comments
I suspect that there is life elsewhere in the universe, but it is probably extremely rare and isolated on far-flung islands of life, like a celestial Polynesia.
Evolution, Christmas and the Atonement
Denis Alexander - The Guardian... 59 Comments
We are not descended from Adam and Eve – but still, Jesus was born to save us.
Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 351 Comments
The new 'evidence' amounts to yet another 'Argument from Personal Incredulity': the Italian scientists cannot understand how it could have been faked.
Americans: Undecided About God?
Eric Weiner - New York Times 59 Comments
Nones don’t get hung up on whether a religion is “true” or not, and instead subscribe to William James’s maxim that “truth is what works.”
MORE BY MICHAEL RUSE
Prayer, menstruation and the Toronto...
Michael Ruse - Chronicle of Higher... 78 Comments
The Catholic Church: Why Richard...
Michael Ruse - The Huffington Post 39 Comments
Michael Ruse - boston.com 58 Comments
Endless forms most beautiful, indeed!
Michael Ruse - John Barber - The... 9 Comments
Why I Think the New Atheists are a...
Michael Ruse - beliefnet 585 Comments




















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page