Darwinopterus v Dawkins

Note that the review starts on one website and ends on another. Comments are on the link to the first half of the article. Also the main site http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz/ makes for some interesting browsing.
http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz/2009/darwinopterus-v-dawkins/

Prominent antitheist and self-styled “atheist” Richard Dawkins has written a new book, The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. Ironically, he admits about all his previous pro-evolution books:

“Looking back on these books, I realized that the evidence for evolution is nowhere explicitly set out, and that it seemed like a good gap to close.”

Naturally, CMI is preparing a book to answer Dawkins’ latest. In a chapter about alleged bad design, Dawkins had a section about the loss of wings and evolution of features like halteres, the little drumstick-like stabilizers behind the one pair of wings on flies.

To set the stage, Dawkins related the theory of English evolutionist (and former debate partner1) John Maynard Smith (1920–2004) about the evolution of flying creatures. Maynard-Smith argued that flying creatures evolved first with high stability and low maneuverability (e.g. with the long pterosaur tail or an insect’s long abdomen). Then they shortened, which caused lower stability but greater maneuverability, and they evolved advanced sensory equipment to stabilize by fast reactions (e.g. larger semicircular canals in pterosaurs or halteres in flies).

Even when Dawkins wrote, there were already dragonflies in the ointment, so to speak, because they have both long bodies (stability) but are also highly maneuverable and have advanced navigation systems. Furthermore, even known pterosaur types didn’t fit this theory, as Dawkins admitted in passing. But after writing our response to this Dawkins “Just-so” story, this new pterosaur turned up, and it adds a final demolition point. This new pterosaur, which to be fair Dawkins could not have known about when he wrote, has the stability of the long tail as well as the advanced correction features before loss of stability supposedly drove the selection for the advanced flying skills.

As a sneak peek, to show that we are indeed rebutting Dawkins’ claims, here is a draft section from our forthcoming book answering The Greatest Show on Earth:
...
Continue reading
http://creation.com/richard-dawkins-v-darwinopterus

TAGGED: -, BOOKS, RICHARD DAWKINS


RELATED CONTENT

ARCHBISHOP TAKES ON ATHEIST DAWKINS

- - EXPRESS.co.uk 116 Comments

The Archbishop of Canterbury and atheist Professor Richard Dawkins are set to go head to head to discuss man's greatest question.

Fri. Feb10, 1pm EST - Rebroadcast of...

- - Simon & Schuster 16 Comments

Fri. Feb10, 1pm EST (GMT-5) - Rebroadcast of Lawrence Krauss/Richard Dawkins ASU event - Lawrence Krauss will answer questions live after the broacast

Dawkins made it to my Sociology class

Omer Kamal Bin Farooq - The Express... 17 Comments

[That documentary] allows us to think out of the comfortable narrative that has been concocted for us by the state and its right-wing allies. Watching it allows us to digest opinions wildly diverse from ours and still give them their due consideration and appreciation. This is what made me happy.

Something from nothing? A conversation...

ASU Origins Project - RDFRS 20 Comments


Something from nothing? A conversation with Lawrence Krauss and Richard Dawkins

In Defense of Richard Dawkins

Christopher Hitchens - Free Inquiry 50 Comments

Why should he sit still and see a valued and precious discipline being insulted, even threatened with not being taught?

“It’s Part of their Culture” - Reading...

Richard Dawkins - RD.net 84 Comments


“It’s Part of their Culture” - Reading Nick Cohen in the light of the Jaipur affair

MORE

MORE BY JONATHAN SARFATI

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment