Casey Luskin: Let's restore civility to the debate on evolution and intelligent design

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/OpEd-Contributor/Casey-Luskin-Lets-restore-civility-to-the-debate-on-evolution-and-intelligent-design--69969312.html

In his new book, “The Greatest Show on Earth,” biologist Richard Dawkins brands those who doubt Charles Darwin’s ideas on evolution as “history deniers,” even stooping to compare them to “Holocaust deniers.”

In today’s highly charged political climate, scientific debates over controversial subjects such as climate change and evolution increasingly substitute such overblown rhetoric for careful analysis.

We commonly see one side depicting the other as not only wrong, but as unreasonable, irrational, or immoral. As a result, two terms are presently in vogue to describe those who question scientific ideas: “Skeptic” and “Denier.”

In practice, the terms have virtually the same meaning – a person who questions an idea - but vastly different connotations are associated with each. “Skeptic” is used when one wants to sound like a critical thinker, portraying oneself as a rogue academic who bucks the trend in order to break new ground.

In contrast, “denier” has all kinds of pernicious connotations and is used to dismiss critics as close-minded, relying on sinister motives to reject some obvious fact.

These connotations often slip by unnoticed, subconsciously shaping public perceptions of an issue. They are powerful tools of persuasion in our conformist culture, where everyone wants to be a chic, hip, and intelligent skeptic, but no one wants to be a clumsy, dimwitted, or even worse, morally deficient denier.

To be sure there are deniers of certain recent historical facts who hold unquestionably false and abhorrent views. But evolutionists abuse those connotations when co-opting the denier rhetoric into the debate over intelligent design (ID).
...
Continue reading
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/OpEd-Contributor/Casey-Luskin-Lets-restore-civility-to-the-debate-on-evolution-and-intelligent-design--69969312.html

TAGGED: -, COMMENTARY, EVOLUTION


RELATED CONTENT

A few Catholics still insist Galileo...

Manya A. Brachear - Chicago Tribune 122 Comments

A few conservative Roman Catholics are pointing to a dozen Bible verses and the church's original teachings as proof that Earth is the center of the universe

Mormon Glenn Beck: Hurricane Irene and...

Elizabeth Tenety - Washington Post -... 86 Comments

Loving Christians respond to atheists

William Hamby - examiner.com 113 Comments

Prince Charles branded a 'snake oil...

Ian Sample - guardian.co.uk 50 Comments

UPDATE: FALSE STORY Jerusalem rabbis...

BBC - BBC News website 154 Comments

A Jewish rabbinical court condemned to death by stoning a stray dog it feared was the reincarnation of a lawyer who insulted its judges, reports say.

MORE

MORE BY CASEY LUSKIN

What Would the World Look Like if the...

Casey Luskin - Evolution News and... 46 Comments


What Would the World Look Like if the New Atheists Won the Day?

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment