Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 | Science : Evolution and Biology | print version Print | Comments |

Document In Snails and Snakes, Features to Delight Darwin

by Sean B. Carroll - New York Times

Thanks to Mordacious1 for the link.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/24/science/24creature.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Charles Darwin seems to have had a boundless interest in the many forms life takes on earth. He could find something about any animal or plant that piqued his insatiable curiosity, and masses of such observations fueled his prodigious output of books and scientific papers.

Darwin was particularly intrigued by what he referred to as “contrivances,” the various biological devices through which creatures make their livings or disperse their young.

Even the most pedestrian species seized his imagination. Take the Roman land snail Helix pomatia, for instance. If one is not a lover of escargot, this common European snail would inspire little attention. But not so for Darwin. He was gripped, and troubled, by the mere existence of land snails.

In 1857, he wrote his first letter to the naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace, who was then making his way across the Malay Archipelago. Wallace’s own voyages and observations would independently lead him to the concept of natural selection.

Darwin explained his obsession: “One of the subjects on which I have been experimentising & which cost me much trouble is the means of distribution of all organic beings found on oceanic islands; & any facts on this subject would be most gratefully received: Land-Molluscs are a great perplexity to me.”
...
Continue reading
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/24/science/24creature.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Comments 1 - 6 of 6 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #434414 by megacephalanthropus on November 24, 2009 at 6:32 am

"He was gripped, and troubled, by the mere existence of land snails."

It's been a mystery to me why there are both land dwelling & sea dwelling slugs & snails.

Other Comments by megacephalanthropus

2. Comment #434427 by weavehole on November 24, 2009 at 7:48 am

Great little article, thanks for posting your Mordaciousnessness1.

Other Comments by weavehole

3. Comment #434457 by Absinthius on November 24, 2009 at 11:06 am

 avatar@Comment #434414 by megacephalanthropus

It's not a question of why, but a question of how. Apparently slugs and snails can survive pretty well on land as well as in the sea, so they did.

Other Comments by Absinthius

4. Comment #434576 by bluebird on November 24, 2009 at 6:12 pm

 avatar"Escargot, bigorneau
Montrez-moi tes cornes!"

Good article to read today, the 150th anniv. - a toast :D
http://www.wasatchbeers.com/images/bottle-Evolution.gif

Other Comments by bluebird

5. Comment #434760 by mordacious1 on November 25, 2009 at 6:23 am

 avatarHmmm...only 4 comments. I thought this was a pretty cool article, especially the links about convergent evolution of asymmetry for functional specialization among right-handed snakes. I mean snakes that have adapted separately to eat snails that open on the left or right. How neat is that?
But then again, I'm a snake guy...

Other Comments by mordacious1

6. Comment #434781 by weavehole on November 25, 2009 at 9:42 am

Hmmm...only 4 comments.


Probably because the article is too well written.

If it didn't neatly summarize a nifty bit of research and instead claimed that this was proof that god always defeats the slithering-slimy devil then...

:)

Other Comments by weavehole
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: