Religion, evolution can live side by side

Thanks to mordacious1 for the link.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/OPINION/11/23/shermer.why.darwin.matters/index.html

(CNN) -- Tuesday marks the 150th anniversary of the publication of Charles Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" on November 24, 1859. All 1,250 copies of the initial print run of the book were scooped up by readers eager to see the British naturalist going rogue with his radical new theory of evolution, "By Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life," in the book's full title.

How important is this book? Thomas Henry Huxley ("Darwin's bulldog") proclaimed that "On the Origin of Species" was "the most potent instrument for the extension of the realm of knowledge which has come into man's hands since Newton's 'Principia,' " and lamented to himself: "How extremely stupid not to have thought of that."

The Harvard biologist Ernst Mayr, arguably the greatest evolutionary theorist since Darwin, asserted: "It would be difficult to refute the claim that the Darwinian revolution was the greatest of all intellectual revolutions in the history of mankind." The Harvard paleontologist and historian of science Stephen Jay Gould called the theory of evolution one of the half dozen most important ideas in the entire history of Western thought.

Why, then, do so many Americans not accept the theory of evolution? A 2001 Gallup Poll found that 45 percent of Americans agree with the statement "God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years or so," while 37 percent preferred a blended belief that "Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God guided this process," and a paltry 12 percent accepted the standard scientific theory that "Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God had no part in this process."
...
Continue reading
http://www.cnn.com/2009/OPINION/11/23/shermer.why.darwin.matters/index.html

TAGGED: COMMENTARY, EVOLUTION, RELIGION


RELATED CONTENT

Secular Guidelines to Moral Living: A...

Jeff Schweitzer - Huffington Post 35 Comments

So, in honor of Hitchens I propose here guidelines to how we can make those daily decisions, a secular distillation of moral behavior derived from those characteristics that define us as human.

The atheist who tried to steal Christmas

Larry Taunton - USA Today 70 Comments

Christmas is, after all, the season of magic, and lest children confuse sugar plum fairies and flying reindeer with the observable and repeatable, the professor has loaded neither toys nor goodies on his sleigh but a heavy dose of "rational skepticism."

Searching under the lamp-post

Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 89 Comments

I suspect that there is life elsewhere in the universe, but it is probably extremely rare and isolated on far-flung islands of life, like a celestial Polynesia.

Evolution, Christmas and the Atonement

Denis Alexander - The Guardian... 59 Comments

We are not descended from Adam and Eve – but still, Jesus was born to save us.

Turin Shroud resurrected

Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 351 Comments

The new 'evidence' amounts to yet another 'Argument from Personal Incredulity': the Italian scientists cannot understand how it could have been faked.

Americans: Undecided About God?

Eric Weiner - New York Times 59 Comments

Nones don’t get hung up on whether a religion is “true” or not, and instead subscribe to William James’s maxim that “truth is what works.”

MORE

MORE BY MICHAEL SHERMER

What's God got to do with it?

Michael Shermer - LA Times 81 Comments

The Believing Brain

Michael Shermer - michaelshermer.com... 5 Comments

The Skeptic's Skeptic

Michael Shermer - Scientific American 30 Comments

When Scientists Sin

Michael Shermer - Scientific American 2 Comments

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment