Are we better off without religion?
By SUE BLACKMORE - GUARDIAN.CO.UK
Added: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:00:00 UTC
Thanks to LWS for the link.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/dec/08/religion-society-gregory-paul
Popular religious belief is caused by dysfunctional social conditions. This is the conclusion of the latest sociological research (pdf) conducted by Gregory Paul. Far from religion benefiting societies, as the "moral-creator socioeconomic hypothesis" would have it, popular religion is a psychological mechanism for coping with high levels of stress and anxiety – or so he suggests.
I've long been interested in Paul's work because it addresses a whole bunch of fascinating questions – why are Americans so religious when the rest of the developed world is increasingly secular? Is religious belief beneficial to societies? does religion make people behave better?
Many believers assume, without question, that it does – even that there can be no morality without religion. They cite George Washington who believed that national morality could not prevail without religions principles, or Dostoevsky's famous claim (actually words of his fictional character Ivan Karamazov) that "without God all things are permitted". Then there are Americans defending their country's peculiarly high levels of popular religious belief and claiming that faith-based charity is better than universal government provision.
...
Continue reading
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/dec/08/religion-society-gregory-paul
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Moral Clarity and Richard Dawkins
Carson - Reasons for God 89 Comments
What kind of meta-ethical foundation has Dawkins provided for his ‘moral home’?
The Moral Necessity of a Godless...
Tauriq Moosa - big think 68 Comments
The Moral Necessity of a Godless Existence
UPDATED: Why I want all our children to...
Richard Dawkins - The Observer 169 Comments
Whatever else the Bible might be – and it really is a great work of literature – it is not a moral book and young people need to learn that important fact because they are very frequently told the opposite.
Who matters (or should) when scientists...
Janet D. Stemwedel - Scientific... 7 Comments
Who matters (or should) when scientists engage in ethical decision-making?
Bioethicist Richard Dawkins: Morality,...
Sean DeButts - BellevuePatch 36 Comments
Bioethicist Richard Dawkins: Morality, Society Can Be "Intelligently Designed"
MORE BY SUE BLACKMORE
Sue Blackmore - Guardian 51 Comments
Atheists have moral reflections too
Sue Blackmore 90 Comments
Sue Blackmore - Guardian 200 Comments
Sue Blackmore 42 Comments




















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page