Religion has nothing to do with science – and vice versa

Original Link

Scientists like Richard Dawkins say the universe has no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, but these things are not the business of science, says geneticist Francisco J. Ayala. They are the exclusive preserve of religion.

Are religion and science incompatible?

Some scientists assert that valid knowledge can only come from science. They hold that religious beliefs are the remains of pre-scientific explanations of the world and amount to nothing more than superstition.

On the other side, some people of faith believe that science conveys a materialistic view of the world that denies the existence of any reality outside the material world. Science, they think, is incompatible with their religious faith.

I contend that both – scientists denying religion and believers rejecting science – are wrong. Science and religious beliefs need not be in contradiction. If they are properly understood, they cannot be in contradiction because science and religion concern different matters.

The scope of science is the world of nature: the reality that is observed, directly or indirectly, by our senses. Science advances explanations about the natural world, explanations that are accepted or rejected by observation and experiment.

Outside the world of nature, however, science has no authority, no statements to make, no business whatsoever taking one position or another. Science has nothing decisive to say about values, whether economic, aesthetic or moral; nothing to say about the meaning of life or its purpose.

Science has nothing to say, either, about religious beliefs, except when these beliefs transcend the proper scope of religion and make assertions about the natural world that contradict scientific knowledge. Such statements cannot be true.

People of faith need not be troubled that science is materialistic. The materialism of science asserts its limits, not its universality. The methods and scope of science remain within the world of matter. It cannot make assertions beyond that world.

Continue Reading

TAGGED: ACCOMMODATIONISM, RELIGION, SCIENCE


RELATED CONTENT

The Descent of Edward Wilson

Richard Dawkins - Prospect 0 Comments

Richard Dawkins's review of The Social Conquest of Earth, by Edward O Wilson (WW Norton, £18.99, May)

Ancient walking mystery deepens

Helen Briggs - BBC News - Science &... 7 Comments

One of the first creatures to step on land could not have walked on four legs, 3D computer models show.

The Center of all Things

Seth Andrews - YouTube -... 21 Comments

The Center of all Things
An homage to Carl Sagan's "Pale Blue Dot," this video explores humankind's place in the cosmos.

Welcome to the Multiverse

Brian Greene - The Daily Beast 35 Comments

The latest developments in cosmology point toward the possibility that our universe is merely one of billions.

Take a stand for public access to...

Bonnie Swoger - Scientific American 5 Comments

Take five minutes of your time to say that yes, cancer patients, researchers, high school students and people around the country should be able to find out what their taxes already paid for.

Draining of world's aquifers feeds...

Damian Carrington - The Observer 3 Comments

"In the long run, I would still be more concerned about the impact of climate change, but this work shows that even if we stabilise the climate, we might still get sea level rise due to how we use water."

MORE

MORE BY FRANCISCO J. AYALA

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment