New Agers and Creationists should not be President
By ROGER EBERT - CHICAGO SUN-TIMES
Added: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:00:00 UTC
Thanks to Kubrik for the link.
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/12/new_agers_and_creationists_sho.html
New Age beliefs are the Creationism of the Progressives. I move in circles where most people would find it absurd to believe that humans didn't evolve from prehistoric ancestors, yet many of these same people quite happily believe in astrology, psychics, reincarnation, the Tarot deck, the i Ching, and sooth-saying. Palmistry and phrenology have pretty much blown over.
If you were attending a dinner party of community leaders in Dallas, Atlanta, Omaha or Colorado Springs and the conversation turned to religion, a chill might fall on the room if you confessed yourself an atheist. Yet at a dinner party of the nicest and brightest in New York, Chicago, San Francisco and (especially) Los Angeles, if the hostess began to confide about past lives, her Sign and yours, and her healing crystals, it might not go over so well if you confessed you thought she was full of it.
New Age beliefs have largely stolen the stage from traditional religion in progressive circles. At dinner in my environs I rarely hear anyone share that they have been born again in Jesus. They may well have been, but they keep it to themselves.
They were raised to avoid religion and politics at dinner parties with strangers. Yet they assure everyone they are "a typical Gemini," were royalty in a previous lifetime, have a personal spirit guide, and have been told they will develop a serious disease but will recover from it. I rarely hear anyone share that they were a toilet cleaner in a previous lifetime and have a year to live at the most.
...
Continue reading
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/12/new_agers_and_creationists_sho.html
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
A Year After the Non-Apocalypse: Where...
Tom Bartlett - Religion Dispatches 24 Comments
A reporter tracks down the remnants of Harold Camping’s apocalyptic movement and finds out you don’t have to be crazy to believe something nuts.
Dolan: White House is “strangling”...
- - Preserve Religious Freedom -... 51 Comments
Dolan: White House is “strangling” Catholic church
Moral Clarity and Richard Dawkins
Carson - Reasons for God 89 Comments
What kind of meta-ethical foundation has Dawkins provided for his ‘moral home’?
"Faith: Pretending to know things you...
Dr. Peter Boghossian - YouTube -... 55 Comments
"Faith: Pretending to know things you don't know"
Debate: Can Atheists and Believers work...
-- - Rationalist Society of Australia 72 Comments
A debate between Chris Stedman, PZ Myers, and Leslie Cannold from April 15, 2012.
Jerry Coyne - Why Evolution Is True 11 Comments
MORE BY ROGER EBERT
Roger Ebert - Roger Ebert's... 18 Comments
Go gentle into that good night
Roger Ebert - Chicago SunTimes 155 Comments
Roger Ebert 73 Comments



















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page