Belief is about truth, not feelings
By OPHELIA BENSON - GUARDIAN.CO.UK HOME LOCATION
Added: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 02:09:48 UTC
Thanks to Miranda for the link
Original link
Belief isn't a wormhole to knowledge about God – it's a cognitive function that should be flexible and open to correction
The question: Can we choose what we believe?
The answer to this question has to be: yes, of course we can, and the idea that we can't is a recipe for credulity and passivity and helplessness before authority.
The important issue isn't how we acquire a belief so much as how we test it, question it, evaluate it. Belief isn't a straight yes or no thing, or at least it shouldn't be. Once we're past childhood (and assuming we've had a decent education), we should know better than to believe whatever we're told.
We're offered potential beliefs all the time, in news reports and advertising and conversation. We don't accept them all; we reject some, we doubt others, and even those we accept we may be prepared to change or reject if we learn more. We know perfectly well – or if we don't, we should – that it's not sensible to believe everything that turns up.
The one major exception to this rule, of course, is religious belief. But the fact that it is an exception is a mix of tradition and social pressure, which means it's extraneous to judgment of the actual quality of the beliefs. There is a strong taboo on evaluating religious beliefs in the same way one would evaluate a news report or an argument or a box of quantum crystal detox foot powder.
Most religious believers are born into and brought up in their religion. Their religious beliefs are handed down by authoritative adults, and asking questions about the beliefs is often discouraged or just plain forbidden. The special arrangement religion has, whereby it's considered wrong to apply normal scepticism to religious beliefs, means that many people simply hang on to the beliefs implanted in childhood (while many more have various levels of doubt but don't say so because of the taboo).
... Continue reading
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Science, Religion and Society: The...
Jerry Coyne - Evolution 0 Comments
Jerry Coyne's paper on the relationship between acceptance of evolution, religion, and societal health, available for free download.
Hemant Mehta - Washington Post 8 Comments
"The Internet is blind faith’s worst nightmare."
A Year After the Non-Apocalypse: Where...
Tom Bartlett - Religion Dispatches 34 Comments
A reporter tracks down the remnants of Harold Camping’s apocalyptic movement and finds out you don’t have to be crazy to believe something nuts.
Dolan: White House is “strangling”...
- - Preserve Religious Freedom -... 52 Comments
Dolan: White House is “strangling” Catholic church
Moral Clarity and Richard Dawkins
Carson - Reasons for God 92 Comments
What kind of meta-ethical foundation has Dawkins provided for his ‘moral home’?
MORE BY OPHELIA BENSON
But not so sorry about other things if...
Ophelia Benson - Butterflies and... 39 Comments
The Vatican feels really really really really bad about what its priests did in Ireland. Really it does. It’s so so so so so sorry. It’s wounded to the core; it’s devastated; it’s super-upset; it’s crying into its pillow every night; it can hardly eat.
Unless…
Ophelia Benson - Butterflies and... 24 Comments
You mean you’re not going to throw me...
Ophelia Benson - Butterflies and... 38 Comments
Ophelia Benson - NewHumanist.org.uk 89 Comments
'... the backlash itself is so full of strawmen, which get recycled with each new instantiation and then harden into the conventional wisdom.'
Those bloodthirsty New Atheists
Ophelia Benson - Butterflies & Wheels 36 Comments



Mr. Deity and the Rights















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page