Origin of the specious
By MICHAEL RUSE - BOSTON.COM
Added: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 UTC
http://www.boston.com/ae/books/articles/2010/02/14/new_critique_intends_to_rebut_darwins_ideas/
âWhat Darwin Got Wrongââ is an intensely irritating book. Jerry Fodor, a well-known philosopher, with coauthor Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, a cognitive scientist, has written a whole book trashing Darwinian evolutionary theory - the theory that makes natural selection the main force of change in organisms through the ages.
You would think that somewhere in the pages there would be one - just one - discussion of the work that evolutionists are doing today to give a sense of how the field itself has evolved. Peter and Rosemary Grant on Darwinâs finches for example; Edward O. Wilson and Bert Hölldobler on ant social structures perhaps; David Reznick on Trinidadian guppies perchance? But no such luck. A whole book putting in the boot and absolutely no serious understanding of where the boot is aimed.
Why write such a book? The authors would respond in two ways. First, in a section that would be better described as âWhat Darwin Didnât Know,â rather than âWhat Darwin Got Wrong,â they tell us that todayâs cutting-edge biology has all sorts of explanations of organic origins that make Darwinism otiose. We learn that life is constrained by the laws of physics and chemistry, and that something like natural selection, which supposedly molds organic life into sophisticated bundles of adaptations, simply cannot get off the ground. To the contrary, evolution is all a matter of molecular development, guided by the self-organizing laws of the physical sciences.
To which Darwinians can only respond, wearily again, that they have known about constraints since âThe Origin of Species.ââ Because body weight cubes as length increases, you cannot build a cat the size of an elephant. The elegant feline legs needed for jumping must be replaced by tree trunks able to carry many pounds.
...
Continue reading
http://www.boston.com/ae/books/articles/2010/02/14/new_critique_intends_to_rebut_darwins_ideas/
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Richard Dawkins - Prospect 2 Comments
Richard Dawkins's review of The Social Conquest of Earth, by Edward O Wilson (WW Norton, £18.99, May)
Ancient walking mystery deepens
Helen Briggs - BBC News - Science &... 7 Comments
One of the first creatures to step on land could not have walked on four legs, 3D computer models show.
Human Races May Have Biological...
Razib Khan - The Crux - Discover... 89 Comments
Human Races May Have Biological Meaning, But Races Mean Nothing About Humanity
Darwinian Selection Continues to...
- - ScienceDaily 45 Comments
New evidence proves humans are continuing to evolve and that significant natural and sexual selection is still taking place in our species in the modern world.
Where's the Beef? Early Humans Took It
Ann Gibbons - Science - AAAS.org 7 Comments
Cool cats. The skull and jaw of two different species of extinct saber-toothed cats, which lived during the heyday of carnivores 3 million to 3.5 million years ago in the Turkana Basin of Kenya.
Credit: Lars Werdelin/© National Museums of Kenya
Rare Protozoan from Sludge in Norwegian...
- - ScienceDaily 29 Comments
Rare Protozoan from Sludge in Norwegian Lake Does Not Fit On Main Branches of Tree of Life
MORE BY MICHAEL RUSE
Prayer, menstruation and the Toronto...
Michael Ruse - Chronicle of Higher... 78 Comments
The Catholic Church: Why Richard...
Michael Ruse - The Huffington Post 39 Comments
Dawkins et al bring us into disrepute
Michael Ruse - guardian.co.uk 222 Comments
Endless forms most beautiful, indeed!
Michael Ruse - John Barber - The... 9 Comments
Why I Think the New Atheists are a...
Michael Ruse - beliefnet 585 Comments




















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page