Who was on the Nazis' naughty list?

Thanks to Tiende Landeplage for the link

Since the pope has declared that the source of the Nazi evil was their atheism, we ought to be able to see that in their laws. Here are the guidelines for banned books in Nazi Germany. A few of them stand out.

Recall that many creationists claim that the horrors of the Holocaust were inspired by Charles Darwin? I don't quite understand, then, why ol' Chuck was on their list of banned authors, along with Ernst Haeckel.

6. Schriften weltanschaulichen und lebenskundlichen Charakters, deren Inhalt die falsche naturwissenschaftliche Aufklärung eines primitiven Darwinismus und Monismus ist (Häckel).

6. Writings of a philosophical and social nature whose content deals with the false scientific enlightenment of primitive Darwinism and Monism (Häckel).

They must have banned religious books, then. But no…it banned books that ridiculed religion.

c) Alle Schriften, welche die christliche Religion und ihre Einrichtungen, den Gottesglauben und andere einem gesunden Volksempfinden heiligen Dinge verhöhnen, verumglimpfen oder verächtlich machen.

c) All writings that ridicule, belittle or besmirch the Christian religion and its institution, faith in God, or other things that are holy to the healthy sentiments of the Volk.

Richard Dawkins can be proud that The God Delusion would have been banned by Hitler, while all the fleas that follow him would have been heroes of the Reich.

... continue to blog

TAGGED: CENSORSHIP, POPE


RELATED CONTENT

Salman Rushdie goes on offensive after...

Jason Burke - The Guardian 7 Comments


Salman Rushdie goes on offensive after Indian
festival appearance is cancelled

To name the unnameable

Kenan Malik - Pandaemonium 15 Comments

But in the real world where societies are plural, then it is both inevitable and important that people offend the sensibilities of others. Inevitable, because where different beliefs are deeply held, clashes are unavoidable. And we should deal with those clashes rather than suppress them. Important because any kind of social change or social progress means offending some deeply held sensibilities. The right to ‘subject each others’ fundamental beliefs to criticism’ is the bedrock of an open, diverse society.

Colbert explains how to deal with...

Dean Putney - BoingBoing - Comedy... 36 Comments


Colbert explains how to deal with Internet
censorship protests

[Updated 15th Jan]- Atheists have no...

- - The Freethinker 429 Comments

[Update Jan 15th] Atheists have no right
to decide what is, or what is not offensive to believers

Atheists face Muslim-led censorship from
UCL Union

UCL Union censorship: Jesus & Mo respond

Jesus & Mo - JesusandMo.net 134 Comments

Could You Be A Criminal? US Supports UN...

Abigail R. Esman - Forbes 61 Comments

Could You Be A Criminal? US Supports UN Anti-Free Speech Measure

MORE

MORE BY PZ MYERS

Bang! How We Came To Be

PZ Myers - Pharyngula 22 Comments

Deepak Chopra reviews Richard Dawkins

PZ Myers - Pharyngula 89 Comments

I think we've been insulted by American...

PZ Myers - Pharyngula 47 Comments

"the major American publishers were reluctant to support a skeptical book, with some suggesting that I re-write it to suggest that ghosts were real and psychic powers actually existed!"

I think the creationists would rather...

PZ Myers - Pharyngula 60 Comments

Abortion needs to be taught in our...

PZ Myers - Pharyngula 77 Comments

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment