Thank goodness for Christopher Hitchens!
By DANIEL C. DENNETT - THE WASHINGTON POST
Added: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:24:48 UTC
Thanks to Catalin for the link
Could it be that some of the Catholics praying for Christopher Hitchens have heard about the Harvard study of prayer and are hoping to provide some further evidence of its one surprising result? In the 2006 study organized by Herbert Benson of Harvard Medical School, the only large-scale and well-controlled scientific examination of the efficaciousness of prayers for hospital patients, there were no statistically significant effects--except for a small negative effect, in which people who knew they were being prayed for did, on average, somewhat worse than the others! So praying for Hitch might be counterproductive. Why might this curious effect exist?
Sports fans and opera buffs know that their sheer presence in the audience, swelling the number of those paying attention, has an effect on the performers--so long as the performers know they are there. Enthusiastic applause boosts moral--and usually that in turn boosts performance, but occasionally, it can lead to "choking" (almost literally in the case of opera singers). People can be unnerved by too much attention, too many anxious people trying to beam too much goodwill by the sheer force of their eagerness. But I suspect that if careful studies have been done of fan "prayer" --they may have, but if so, I don't know them--the net average effect will have been shown to be positive: when people are "rooting for you," you do better. Certainly that is what athletes and opera singers believe; they love a large following. And I'm happy to assume that this is what Catholics believe as well.
When I was in a similar medical crisis four years ago, I wrote a piece ["Thank Goodness!"] about my gratitude to the doctors (not to God) for saving my life, and said I was forgiving those friends of mine who had the courage to tell me that they were praying for me. I resisted the temptation to respond "Thanks, I appreciate it, but did you also sacrifice a goat?"
... continue reading
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Will Self - BBC News Magazine 100 Comments
We chase "fast culture" at our peril - unusual words and difficult art are good for us, says Will Self.
Annie Murphy Paul - New York Times 24 Comments
New support for the value of fiction is arriving from an unexpected quarter: neuroscience.
The spectre of militant secularism
Nick Cohen - The Spectator 40 Comments
If you turn on the news tonight and hear of a bomber slaughtering civilians anywhere from Nigeria to the London Underground, I can reassure you of one point: the bombers will not be readers of Richard Dawkins.
A brutal price still paid for daring to...
Amol Rajan - The Independent 39 Comments
Their assault illustrates the extent to which defenders of religion still dominate our press, the brutal retaliation exacted on clever opponents of faith and the incorrigible stupidity of Sayeeda Warsi's claim about "militant secularism" last week.
The Sins of the Fathers [Also in Polish]
Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 341 Comments
I can’t help wondering at the quality of journalism which sees a scoop in attacking a man for what his five-greats grandfather did.
The Devil, the internet, Richard...
Stephen Bayley - Telegraph blogs 138 Comments
Which, talking of dissimulation, brings me to Richard Dawkins, a fanatic disguised as a scientist.
MORE BY DANIEL C. DENNETT
Skeptical clergy a silent majority?
Daniel C. Dennett - The Washington... 40 Comments
Problem of evil and religion's...
Daniel C. Dennett - The Washington... 73 Comments
Religious no longer a protected class
Daniel C. Dennett - The Washington... 77 Comments
Daniel C. Dennett 14 Comments
Daniel C. Dennett 117 Comments
Not Yet The Majority But No Longer...
Daniel C. Dennett 73 Comments



















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page