Flowering Plants May Be Considerably Older Than Previously Thought
By SCIENCEDAILY
Added: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 UTC
Thanks to AtheistRamblings for the link.
Original link
Flowering plants may be considerably older than previously thought, says a new analysis of the plant family tree.
Previous studies suggest that flowering plants, or angiosperms, first arose 140 to 190 million years ago. Now, a paper to be published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences pushes back the age of angiosperms to 215 million years ago, some 25 to 75 million years earlier than either the fossil record or previous molecular studies suggest.
"If you just looked at the fossil record, you would say that angiosperms originated in the early Cretaceous or late Jurassic," said Michael Donoghue of Yale University. "Most molecular divergence times have shown that they might be older than that," added Yale biologist Jeremy Beaulieu. "But we actually find that they might be Triassic in origin," said Beaulieu. "No one has found a result like that before."
If confirmed, the study could bolster the idea that early angiosperms promoted the rise of certain insects. Modern insects like bees and wasps rely on flowers for nectar and pollen. "The fossil record suggests that a lot of these insect groups originated before angiosperms appeared," said Stephen Smith of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center. This study shifts the oldest angiosperms back farther in time towards the origin of groups like bees and flies, the scientists say. "If you take our dates and superimpose them on the evolutionary tree for these insect groups, all of a sudden you get a match," said Beaulieu.
...
Continue reading
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Richard Dawkins - Prospect 7 Comments
Richard Dawkins's review of The Social Conquest of Earth, by Edward O Wilson (WW Norton, £18.99, May)
Ancient walking mystery deepens
Helen Briggs - BBC News - Science &... 7 Comments
One of the first creatures to step on land could not have walked on four legs, 3D computer models show.
Human Races May Have Biological...
Razib Khan - The Crux - Discover... 89 Comments
Human Races May Have Biological Meaning, But Races Mean Nothing About Humanity
Darwinian Selection Continues to...
- - ScienceDaily 45 Comments
New evidence proves humans are continuing to evolve and that significant natural and sexual selection is still taking place in our species in the modern world.
Where's the Beef? Early Humans Took It
Ann Gibbons - Science - AAAS.org 7 Comments
Cool cats. The skull and jaw of two different species of extinct saber-toothed cats, which lived during the heyday of carnivores 3 million to 3.5 million years ago in the Turkana Basin of Kenya.
Credit: Lars Werdelin/© National Museums of Kenya
Rare Protozoan from Sludge in Norwegian...
- - ScienceDaily 29 Comments
Rare Protozoan from Sludge in Norwegian Lake Does Not Fit On Main Branches of Tree of Life
MORE BY SCIENCEDAILY
Gaming for a Cure: Computer Gamers...
ScienceDaily - ScienceDaily 17 Comments
Genetic Mismatch Keeps Yeast Species...
ScienceDaily - ScienceDaily 3 Comments
Elusive Ant Queen Pheromone Tracked Down
ScienceDaily - ScienceDaily 11 Comments
DNA Through Graphene Nanopores
ScienceDaily - ScienceDaily 7 Comments
Alternative Evolution: Why Change Your...
ScienceDaily - ScienceDaily 11 Comments
Novel Ion Trap With Optical Fiber Could...
ScienceDaily - ScienceDaily 4 Comments



















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page