Morality, with limits
By RUSSELL BLACKFORD - GUARDIAN.CO.UK
Added: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 UTC
Original link
The question: What can Darwin teach us about morality?
At least to some extent, we are a species with an evolved psychology. Like other animals, we have inherited behavioural tendencies from our ancestors, since these were adaptive for them in the sense that they tended to lead to reproductive success in past environments.
But what follows from this? It does not follow that we should now do whatever maximises our ability to reproduce and pass down our genes. For example, evolution may have honed us to desire and enjoy sex, through a process in which creatures that did so reproduced more often than their evolutionary competitors. But evolution has not equipped us with an abstract desire to pass down our genes. Knowing all this, what should we do? Well, we are not evolution's slaves. All other things being equal, we should act in accordance with the desires that we actually have, in this case the desire for sex. We may also desire to have children, but perhaps only one or two: in that case, we should act in such a way as to have as much sex as possible while also producing children in this small number.
By all means, then, let's use contraceptive technologies for family planning. This may be "unnatural", in a sense, but so what?
Generally speaking, it is rational for us to act in ways that accord with our reflectively-endorsed desires or values, rather than in ways that maximise our reproductive chances or in whatever ways we tend to respond without thinking. If we value the benefits of social living, this may require that we support and conform to socially-developed norms of conduct that constrain individuals from acting in ruthless pursuit of self-interest. Admittedly, our evolved nature may affect this, in the sense that any workable system of moral norms must be practical for the needs of beings like us, who are, it seems, naturally inclined to be neither angelically selfless nor utterly uncaring about others. Thus, our evolved psychology may impose limits on what real-world moral systems can realistically demand of human beings, perhaps defeating some of the more extreme ambitions of both conservatives and liberals. It may not be realistic to expect each other to be either as self-denying as moral conservatives seem to want or as altruistic as some liberals seem to want.
...
Continue reading
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Moral Clarity and Richard Dawkins
Carson - Reasons for God 92 Comments
What kind of meta-ethical foundation has Dawkins provided for his ‘moral home’?
The Moral Necessity of a Godless...
Tauriq Moosa - big think 77 Comments
The Moral Necessity of a Godless Existence
UPDATED: Why I want all our children to...
Richard Dawkins - The Observer 179 Comments
Whatever else the Bible might be – and it really is a great work of literature – it is not a moral book and young people need to learn that important fact because they are very frequently told the opposite.
Who matters (or should) when scientists...
Janet D. Stemwedel - Scientific... 7 Comments
Who matters (or should) when scientists engage in ethical decision-making?
Bioethicist Richard Dawkins: Morality,...
Sean DeButts - BellevuePatch 36 Comments
Bioethicist Richard Dawkins: Morality, Society Can Be "Intelligently Designed"
MORE BY RUSSELL BLACKFORD
Secularism, priorities, Islam, and...
Russell Blackford - Talking Philosophy 23 Comments
Secularism, priorities, Islam, and Waleed Aly
Russel Blackford reviews Attack of the...
Russell Blackford - Metamagician and... 24 Comments
Currently reading - Attack of the Theocrats by Sean Faircloth
Religious freedom and religious...
Russell Blackford - Talking Philosophy 17 Comments
I enjoyed reading Mike LaBossiere’s post entitled “Church & State: Immaculate Contraception”, but I can’t resist the impulse to add a post of my own – perhaps because I lack free will in the matter, but mainly because I devote an entire chapter of Freedom of Religion and the Secular State to this sort of issue (so it is kind of on my mind), and certainly because it has become even more topical than usual.
More rubbish about "shrill" atheists -...
Russell Blackford - Metamagician and... 90 Comments





















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page