Pope Ratzinger - A Failed Letter Of Apology
By MJP CAMPBELL - YOUNG FREETHOUGHT
Updated: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:54:17 UTC
Original link
Todayâs letter published by the Vatican, written by the current Pope, Joseph Ratzinger, is a subversive excuse for a true apology and an honest acknowledgment of guilt on the part of the pontiff . Issued in response to the growing media furore around grievous child rape carried out by the Church, the document doesnât go nearly far enough. Addressed âTo The Catholics Of Irelandâ, Ratzinger directly writes to each party affected, whilst accepting no personal responsibility for the âscandalâ he knew more about than anyone else.
As prefect of the Inquisition, rebranded in 1983 as âThe Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faithâ, for 23 years between 1981 and 2005 when he was elected Bishop of Rome, he was responsible for overseeing child abuse allegations from 2001 onward. In May of that year, he sent an (separate) infamous letter, in secret, to all bishops, that was made public in 2005, after the Cardinalâs successful election (Iâve been unable to find a copy in translation, but for those of you who study Latin, the original letter can be found here). Its contents are well known by now, and graces blogs and websites all over the web. Iâm only happy to add to this number. It states that investigations into child abuse allegations should be ârestrained by a perpetual silenceâ and âconducted in the most secretive wayâ. The penalty for leaking? – Excommunication. Ratzingerâs despicable letter ends âCases of this kind are subject to the pontifical secretâ. It also states that all investigations are to be conducted within the Church and that such jurisdiction ends 10 years after the victim turns 18 years old.
At the time, there was outcry from all decent commentators. Daniel Shea, a lawyer for two victims of priestly molestation, stated it simply showed âan obstruction of justiceâ. All cases were to go through Ratzingerâs desk, and could be then be sent to âprivate tribunalsâ where the âfunctions of judge, promoter of justice, notary and legal representative [could] validly be performed for these cases only by priestsâ.
...
Continue reading
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Cardinal Edward Egan Just Withdrew His...
Michael Brendan Dougherty -... 50 Comments
Contrary to his claim, during his twelve-year enthronement at Bridgeport, Egan repeatedly failed to investigate priests where there were obvious signs of abuse, according to The Hartford Courant. His diocese had to settle the cases and awarded victims some $12-15 million in damages.
Pakistan: Karachi police free chained...
- - BBC News - Asia 45 Comments
[...] the discovery of chained students of a religious seminary who claim they were being motivated to join the ranks of Taliban has come as a shock.
High Court rules Catholic Church liable...
- - BBC News 81 Comments
Fundamentalist Book a Factor in Child...
Sean Faircloth - RDFRS 33 Comments
More than 400 claims of physical abuse...
Murray Wardrop - The Telegraph 31 Comments
MORE BY MJP CAMPBELL
The Catholic Church Fights Justice Once...
MJP Campbell - Young Freethought 55 Comments
Bloodthirsty Syrian President Supported...
MJP Campbell - Young Freethought 32 Comments
MJP Campbell - Young Freethought 31 Comments
The Catholic Scandal Rolls On...
MJP Campbell - Young Freethought 33 Comments
Protest The Pope - News & Information
MJP Campbell - Young Freethought 27 Comments





















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page