Pope Ratzinger - A Failed Letter Of Apology
By MJP CAMPBELL - YOUNG FREETHOUGHT
Updated: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:54:17 UTC
Original link
Todayâs letter published by the Vatican, written by the current Pope, Joseph Ratzinger, is a subversive excuse for a true apology and an honest acknowledgment of guilt on the part of the pontiff . Issued in response to the growing media furore around grievous child rape carried out by the Church, the document doesnât go nearly far enough. Addressed âTo The Catholics Of Irelandâ, Ratzinger directly writes to each party affected, whilst accepting no personal responsibility for the âscandalâ he knew more about than anyone else.
As prefect of the Inquisition, rebranded in 1983 as âThe Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faithâ, for 23 years between 1981 and 2005 when he was elected Bishop of Rome, he was responsible for overseeing child abuse allegations from 2001 onward. In May of that year, he sent an (separate) infamous letter, in secret, to all bishops, that was made public in 2005, after the Cardinalâs successful election (Iâve been unable to find a copy in translation, but for those of you who study Latin, the original letter can be found here). Its contents are well known by now, and graces blogs and websites all over the web. Iâm only happy to add to this number. It states that investigations into child abuse allegations should be ârestrained by a perpetual silenceâ and âconducted in the most secretive wayâ. The penalty for leaking? – Excommunication. Ratzingerâs despicable letter ends âCases of this kind are subject to the pontifical secretâ. It also states that all investigations are to be conducted within the Church and that such jurisdiction ends 10 years after the victim turns 18 years old.
At the time, there was outcry from all decent commentators. Daniel Shea, a lawyer for two victims of priestly molestation, stated it simply showed âan obstruction of justiceâ. All cases were to go through Ratzingerâs desk, and could be then be sent to âprivate tribunalsâ where the âfunctions of judge, promoter of justice, notary and legal representative [could] validly be performed for these cases only by priestsâ.
...
Continue reading
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Science, Religion and Society: The...
Jerry Coyne - Evolution 0 Comments
Jerry Coyne's paper on the relationship between acceptance of evolution, religion, and societal health, available for free download.
Hemant Mehta - Washington Post 10 Comments
"The Internet is blind faith’s worst nightmare."
A Year After the Non-Apocalypse: Where...
Tom Bartlett - Religion Dispatches 34 Comments
A reporter tracks down the remnants of Harold Camping’s apocalyptic movement and finds out you don’t have to be crazy to believe something nuts.
Dolan: White House is “strangling”...
- - Preserve Religious Freedom -... 52 Comments
Dolan: White House is “strangling” Catholic church
Moral Clarity and Richard Dawkins
Carson - Reasons for God 92 Comments
What kind of meta-ethical foundation has Dawkins provided for his ‘moral home’?
MORE BY MJP CAMPBELL
The Catholic Church Fights Justice Once...
MJP Campbell - Young Freethought 55 Comments
Bloodthirsty Syrian President Supported...
MJP Campbell - Young Freethought 32 Comments
MJP Campbell - Young Freethought 31 Comments
The Catholic Scandal Rolls On...
MJP Campbell - Young Freethought 33 Comments
Protest The Pope - News & Information
MJP Campbell - Young Freethought 27 Comments



Mr. Deity and the Rights
















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page