Dismiss dinosaurs as failures...and pave a path to a bleak future
By SCOTT D. SAMPSON - SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN
Added: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 UTC
Original link
Dinosaurs are frequently cited as the ultimate exemplars of failure. âDead as a dinosaurâ is now deeply embedded in our vernacular. Yet death for a species, and even for groups of species, is as inevitable as your death. Somewhere around 99 percent of all species that have ever existed are now extinct. The 10 million to 50 million species that comprise the modern day biosphere (the uncertainty due mostly to our lack of understanding of microbial diversity) are but the latest players in a four-billion-year drama—âThe Greatest Show on Earth,â to borrow the title of Richard Dawkins most recent book.
Similarly, the event that decimated the dinosaurs about 65.5 million years ago killed off only those dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus rex and Triceratops horridus alive at the end of the Cretaceous Period (with the exception of some birds, which managed to survive this biologic bottleneck). Dinosaurs existed for 160 million years prior to that doomsday event, birthing a bewildering array of forms that succumbed to the scythe of extinction long before a giant asteroid slammed into the Gulf of Mexico. By comparison, we humans have been around a mere 200,000 years or so, and our small clan of bipedal primate cousins originated about six million years ago. In other words, dinosaurs are a great success story rather than a bunch of prehistoric washouts.
The notion of dinosaurs as failures underscores a pair of conditions that threaten the persistence of humanity: myopia and hubris. Lacking a meaningful sense of deep time, we tend to lump all pre-human life-forms into a single box labeled âextinct.â Virtually blinded by our severe temporal myopia, we ignore the multi-billion-year skein of life-forms, the dramatic comings and goings of organisms through the geologic ages. Meanwhile, our hubris derives from a worldview that transforms other life forms to objects, and places humans not only outside but superior to (nonhuman) nature. While I admit to personal bias on the matter, itâs simply ridiculous to thumb our noses at dinosaurs and laugh derisively at their present-day absence. We might as well speak contemptuously of our great grandparents; after all, theyâre no longer with us.
...
Continue reading
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Richard Dawkins - Prospect 7 Comments
Richard Dawkins's review of The Social Conquest of Earth, by Edward O Wilson (WW Norton, £18.99, May)
Ancient walking mystery deepens
Helen Briggs - BBC News - Science &... 7 Comments
One of the first creatures to step on land could not have walked on four legs, 3D computer models show.
Human Races May Have Biological...
Razib Khan - The Crux - Discover... 89 Comments
Human Races May Have Biological Meaning, But Races Mean Nothing About Humanity
Darwinian Selection Continues to...
- - ScienceDaily 45 Comments
New evidence proves humans are continuing to evolve and that significant natural and sexual selection is still taking place in our species in the modern world.
Where's the Beef? Early Humans Took It
Ann Gibbons - Science - AAAS.org 7 Comments
Cool cats. The skull and jaw of two different species of extinct saber-toothed cats, which lived during the heyday of carnivores 3 million to 3.5 million years ago in the Turkana Basin of Kenya.
Credit: Lars Werdelin/© National Museums of Kenya
Rare Protozoan from Sludge in Norwegian...
- - ScienceDaily 29 Comments
Rare Protozoan from Sludge in Norwegian Lake Does Not Fit On Main Branches of Tree of Life



















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page