Shame on the National Academy
By RICHARD DAWKINS
Added: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 UTC
The US National Academy of Sciences has brought ignominy on itself by agreeing to host the announcement of the 2010 Templeton Prize (see below). This is exactly the kind of thing Templeton is ceaselessly angling for – recognition among real scientists – and they use their money shamelessly to satisfy their doomed craving for scientific respectability. They tried it on with the Royal Society of London, and they seem to have found a compliant Quisling in the current President, Martin Rees, who, though not religious himself, is a fervent 'believer in belief'. Fortunately, enough Fellows made a stink about it to ensure that the Royal will not flirt with Templeton in future. Now Templeton are apparently trying the same trick with the US National Academy. If you know any officers, or elected members, of the Academy, please write in protest.
Incidentally, look at the fatuous request in capital letters in the middle of the announcement: "If you guess the winner, please honor a strict embargo (you can't tell anyone) until 11.00 am on Thursday March 25th 2010." Embargo a guess? It is one thing to put an embargo on privileged information, but embargo a GUESS? Well, I suppose that is just another indication of the way a faith-head's mind works. Their whole world-view, after all, is founded on an inability to distinguish evidence from an ill-informed guess.
Well, let's all guess away to our heart's content. Which leading scientist has done the most to betray science in favour of his imaginary friend? You can rule out the people they'd privately like to honor (such as Intelligent Design "theorists") because that would go against the official policy of courting respectability among scientists. Nowadays they target genuinely good scientists (like Freeman Dyson, winner of the 2000 Templeton Prize), whose subversion provides more bang for the (mega)buck than primarily religious figures who happen also to be scientists. In the early days they didn't even make a pretence of finding a scientist at all: the 1982 winner was the notorious creationist Billy Graham!
The smart money for the embargoed God's Applepolisher Guess (GAG) is on Francis Collins (he's the person who finds C S Lewis persuasive, and who saw the Trinity in a three-pronged frozen waterfall), but I'd place a side bet on Simon Conway Morris or Martin Nowak.
Richard
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Richard Dawkins - Prospect 7 Comments
Richard Dawkins's review of The Social Conquest of Earth, by Edward O Wilson (WW Norton, £18.99, May)
The beauty of creation: an interview...
Heather Catchpole - COSMOS Magazine 3 Comments
The beauty of creation: an interview with Richard Dawkins
COSMOS Managing Editor, Heather Catchpole, caught up with Richard Dawkins to discuss evolution, the origin of life and his plans for his next book.
Moral Clarity and Richard Dawkins
Carson - Reasons for God 91 Comments
What kind of meta-ethical foundation has Dawkins provided for his ‘moral home’?
No blood on the carpet. How...
Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 173 Comments
[Journalists] seem to feel let down when they discover that the real people aren't anything like the way they so relentlessly portray us; as if, since they've gone to the trouble of inventing extravagant caricatures of us, we should at least have the decency to live up to them in real life.
Also in Polish
UPDATED: Why I want all our children to...
Richard Dawkins - The Observer 172 Comments
Whatever else the Bible might be – and it really is a great work of literature – it is not a moral book and young people need to learn that important fact because they are very frequently told the opposite.
Richard Dawkins - US October 2012 Tour
- - RichardDawkins.net 27 Comments
MORE BY RICHARD DAWKINS
Richard Dawkins - Prospect 7 Comments
Richard Dawkins's review of The Social Conquest of Earth, by Edward O Wilson (WW Norton, £18.99, May)
No blood on the carpet. How...
Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 173 Comments
[Journalists] seem to feel let down when they discover that the real people aren't anything like the way they so relentlessly portray us; as if, since they've gone to the trouble of inventing extravagant caricatures of us, we should at least have the decency to live up to them in real life.
Also in Polish
UPDATED: Why I want all our children to...
Richard Dawkins - The Observer 172 Comments
Whatever else the Bible might be – and it really is a great work of literature – it is not a moral book and young people need to learn that important fact because they are very frequently told the opposite.
Richard Dawkins speaks on Reason Rally
Richard Dawkins - Washington Post 21 Comments
Richard Dawkins speaking to Sally Quinn about the Reason Rally
Who would rally against reason? [Also...
Richard Dawkins - Washington Post On... 49 Comments
Even if you are unaccustomed to living by reason, if you are one of those, perhaps, who actively distrust reason, why not give it a try? Cast aside the prejudices of upbringing and habit, and come along anyway. (Also translated into Polish)
IN FULL: Atheist in memory lapse and...
Richard Dawkins - New Statesman 18 Comments
Following a week of attacks, the evolutionary biologist responds to his critics – and argues Britain must not make policy by following “Census Christians” who can’t name the first book of the New Testament.



















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page