Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Saturday, January 20, 2007 | Reason : Political | print version Print | Comments |

Document Sex and the Single-Minded

by Stacy Schiff

Reposted from the New York Times:
http://select.nytimes.com/2007/01/20/opinion/20schiff.html?th&emc=th

How to get a job in Washington, that balmy, bipartisan town: Direct an organization that opposes contraception on the grounds that it is "demeaning to women." Compare premarital sex to heroin addiction. Advertise a link between breast cancer and abortion — a link that was refuted in 1997. Rant against sex ed. And hatch a loony theory about hormones.

You're a shoo-in, and if your name is Eric Keroack you're in your second month as deputy assistant secretary for population affairs at the Department of Health and Human Services. Dr. Keroack, a 46-year-old Massachusetts ob-gyn, today oversees the $280 million Title X program, the only federal program "designed to provide access to contraceptive supplies and information to all who want and need them, with priority given to low-income persons."

It's not a job that plays to Dr. Keroack's talents, which happen to be prodigious. In the PowerPoint presentation that has cemented his reputation, he makes the case that premarital sex suppresses the hormone oxytocin, thereby impairing one's ability to forge a successful long-term relationship. If forced to mince words you might call this fanciful or speculative. Otherwise you'd call it wacko. "Really, really scary" and "utterly hilarious" were the first two reactions I heard from scientists.

Each of us owes a rather critical debt to oxytocin. It's what moves a new mother to comfort and nurse a squalling baby rather than to toss it from the window, as common sense might dictate. It is — you knew your husband was missing something — the hormone of intimacy. (No, you can't buy supplements across the border. And yes, OxyContin is something different. Rush Limbaugh was not working on his bonding instincts.)

Louann Brizendine, a neuropsychiatrist at the University of California, San Francisco, calls oxytocin the Glinda the Good Witch of her field. It is the drug of trust and partnership and attachment, commonly known by their street name: love. Oxytocin mellows, elates, and throws you into a mental fog. Rats prefer it to cocaine. While the rush at childbirth is particularly dramatic, the hormone swells with physical and emotional bonding of all kinds.

"Surge" has not always been a dirty word.

But no one has had as much good, clean fun with oxytocin as Dr. Keroack, for whom it is "God's superglue." Extrapolating in part from research with prairie voles, which are monogamous, he postulates that oxytocin cannot survive too much sex, at least with multiple partners, at least prior to marriage. By way of demonstration he proposes the duct tape test: you need only an adhesive and a hairy arm. The tape represents the brain. Press it down. Now reapply. See what happens? Less sticky, right? Concludes Keroack: "Basically, you will end up damaging your brain's ability to use the oxytocin system as a chemical mechanism that serves to help you successfully bond in future relationships." Don't ask about his illustrations. They are offensive.

Keroack presents this as gospel truth, though the scientists on whose research he bases his theory balk. One called it a wild leap. "A bungee jump without a cord," suggested another expert. Dr. Brizendine had a less kind word for it. She adds that while premarital sex cannot ruin your oxytocin response, it has been shown — in the absence of options — to ruin your life. Something tells me that Dr. Keroack is not planning a 34th anniversary bash on Monday for Roe v. Wade.

I know what you're thinking: if Dr. Keroack can write stuff this outlandish he's spelling his name wrong. As the other Kerouac said — arguably with a firmer grasp of neurochemistry — "I had nothing to offer anybody but my own confusion." Dr. Keroack may want to borrow the disclaimer that prefaces Michael Crichton's newest best-seller: "This novel is fiction, except for the parts that aren't." It takes an agenda rather than a medical degree to engage in this kind of science. Or an imagination.

In all fairness, Dr. Keroack has long been a little clumsy as an analogist. In a 2001 letter to the Massachusetts Legislature he explained the logic of performing sonograms on women considering abortion: "Even Midas lets you look at your old muffler before they advise you to change it."

There are many ways to define demeaning.

Stacy Schiff is the author, most recently, of "A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France and the Birth of America." She is a guest columnist.

Comments 1 - 14 of 14 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #18363 by k1mgy on January 20, 2007 at 4:34 am

 avatarI am sorry for my home state.

Other Comments by k1mgy

2. Comment #18364 by Logicel on January 20, 2007 at 4:46 am

 avatar"...he postulates that oxytocin cannot survive too much sex, at least with multiple partners, at least prior to marriage."
_______

Christians use 'science'--twisting science would be a more accurate term--when it suits the furthering of their beliefs and discard it when it does not.

Since more sex will have gone on between the Christian couple with kid number 5 than kid number 4, does that then mean the mother will bond less to kid number 5?

This disgusting example of a Christian extremist being appointed by Bush to head a contraception program is one of the many reasons why non-theists can no longer lamely tolerate Christian meddling, intolerance, and twisting science to support their religious superstitions.

Other Comments by Logicel

3. Comment #18366 by Dogbreath on January 20, 2007 at 5:33 am

 avatarAs Sam Harris quite rightly states, it is a lifetime of religious moderation that has allowed this kind of extremism to flourish. As wacky as this is, this guy has flown right in...in full view!!!

Other Comments by Dogbreath

4. Comment #18381 by Kismettena on January 20, 2007 at 8:33 am

Have felt pretty depressed since this a-hole began to oversee Title X. The only parallel I can currently think of is having Lil Markie oversee one's voice lessons...

Other Comments by Kismettena

5. Comment #18387 by Magpie on January 20, 2007 at 9:18 am

Actually, if we accept the long-term potentiation theory of memory (LTP), constantly using synapses and their associated neurotransmitters may well potentiate them - make them more likely to fire given a certain stimuli - thus premarital sex may well increase the likelihood of having a longlasting relationship. Just a thought.

Other Comments by Magpie

6. Comment #18389 by HappyPrimate on January 20, 2007 at 10:44 am

 avatarThis article is far to kind to Dr. Keroack. Where are the scientists with the tar and feathers?

Other Comments by HappyPrimate

7. Comment #18391 by JDAM on January 20, 2007 at 11:43 am

I was once a FLAMING leftie. My name is still on a brick at KPFA in Berserkly for a large cash donation to the station. However, as an old friend and mentor taught, "You can't be a conservative until you have something to conserve..." which I ultimately achieved, only to have Clinton attempt to confiscate it with his 1994 tax increase.

I was once an ardent supporter of the President. Not perfect, but to achieve the bulk of those things that were important to me I felt he and his crew offered way, way more than the Dems could even think of.

The silly but continued stupid antics of the Republicans gave me pause in 2004, along with the former Attorney General's prayer meetings, but one look at Kerry was all I needed to continue on the path I took, despite increasing disillusionment. I knew that religious nuts were increasingly populating the current administration but I had NO idea how deeply and how religiously nutty these persons actually were.

This story has pushed me over the brink. I re-registered as an Independent, for all the good that will do and am now thoroughly convinced that the bulk of the Bushies need to be sent packing.

Unfortunately, all of the viable alternatives currently exist only in minor splinter parties, such as the Libertarians...

What's a Conservative Nontheist to do???

Other Comments by JDAM

8. Comment #18393 by Duff on January 20, 2007 at 2:24 pm

Magpie, you are a flaming genius!!! Stimulate the neuro-transmitters until they scream for replication...replication...replication!!!

Other Comments by Duff

9. Comment #18404 by MelM on January 20, 2007 at 3:41 pm

A culture of misery.

When I look at the long list of "hot button" bans the Christians advocate, there's a common theme: they inject unnecessary suffering into the lives of real people.
Examples:
. no contraception
. no abortion
. no divorce
. no cutting off life-support for some vegetative patients
. no embryonic stem cell research
. no doctor assisted suicide

The religionists (in the U.S. anyway) call this a "culture of life."
I think of it as a "culture of misery" and I don't think near enough is being said about it.

"No sex out of marriage" is just one more item in their "culture of misery." I find the idea appalling!

Other Comments by MelM

10. Comment #18431 by Dos on January 20, 2007 at 7:04 pm

If Christians do not believe in evolution i can't quite understand how Keroack can have so much faith in this experiment with Prairie Voles and any extrapolation of the results to humans... Is this just another example of the hypocrisy of religion?

Other Comments by Dos

11. Comment #18450 by CJ on January 21, 2007 at 12:46 am

 avatar10. Dos, your comment sparked a thought.

In the "good old days" people like us, rationalists and atheists (I tend to think of the two things as combined) would have been imprisoned, possibly tortured and in extremis executed for saying what we can now publish to the world via the internet.

Religion has never had to tolerate criticism; it just played the God/Faith trump card and won the argument. It can't do that anymore. The result has been that religion has had to justify itself by argument and of course it can't. Consequently it attempts to abuse science to justify its own un-justifiable position. And ultimately this will fail as the bedrock of the scientific method, repeatable evidence based proof, is just not there to be found.

The meme (or mind virus as coined by RD) of religion has never faced such strong opposition as it does today.

So to answer your question; "Is this just another example of the hypocrisy of religion?"

Undoubtedly yes! But further it is evidence of uncertainty in the mind of the theist that the God/Faith trump card no longer works. And this doubt is the chink through which the meme of rationalism gains entry and grows.

Chris

Other Comments by CJ

12. Comment #18762 by NeoGothic on January 22, 2007 at 8:33 pm

MelM's comment about a Culture of Misery brings to light an interesting trend: The vast majority of the christians hot button issues are about our life cycle, especially sex and reproduction. Now, if I were to have a religion grow up in a desert region where you had to work hard for every scrap of food and water was hard to come by, I too would cultivate beliefs that would place a premium on not having children I couldn't support. This goes to show that a religion's beliefs are arbitrary and are heavily influenced by your environment.

Other Comments by NeoGothic

13. Comment #18947 by Russell Blackford on January 23, 2007 at 11:58 pm

Re #18404, like the "culture of misery" line.

Other Comments by Russell Blackford

14. Comment #19220 by linck on January 25, 2007 at 3:58 pm

 avatarIt is amazing that wearing a simple ring will reprogram the "God's superglue" sensors of the brain so dramatic.
Normally they would degenerate do to too much sex, but now they are probably also fruitfully multiplying.

Is it crucial on which hand/ finger the ring is worn?
(After all it seems to have a hithero undiscovered hotwiring to the pleasure center of the brain)
Would a priest's blessing of the marriage stimulate oxycytin production? If yes, is it through direct telepathy rediating from the priest or via celestial-relay?

Anyway does it seem that "God's superglue" lost most of its mojo over the last 3000 yrs. Back then a man could be righteous to many wifes in the eyes of God.

Other Comments by linck
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: