Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Tuesday, January 23, 2007 | Reason : Science of Religion | print version Print | Comments |

Document Do You Believe in Magic?

by Benedict Carey, NYTimes.com

Thanks to Mark Richards for the link.

Reposted from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/23/health/psychology/23magic.html


magic1

A graduate school application can go sour in as many ways as a blind date. The personal essay might seem too eager, the references too casual. The admissions officer on duty might be nursing a grudge. Or a hangover.

Rachel Riskind of Austin, Tex., nonetheless has a good feeling about her chances for admittance to the University of Michigan's exclusive graduate program in psychology, and it's not just a matter of her qualifications.

On a recent afternoon, as she was working on the admissions application, she went out for lunch with co-workers. Walking from the car to the restaurant in a misting rain, she saw a woman stroll by with a Michigan umbrella.

"I felt it was a sign; you almost never see Michigan stuff here," said Ms. Riskind, 22. "And I guess I think that has given me a kind of confidence. Even if it's a false confidence, I know that that in itself can help people do well."

magic2

Psychologists and anthropologists have typically turned to faith healers, tribal cultures or New Age spiritualists to study the underpinnings of belief in superstition or magical powers. Yet they could just as well have examined their own neighbors, lab assistants or even some fellow scientists. New research demonstrates that habits of so-called magical thinking — the belief, for instance, that wishing harm on a loathed colleague or relative might make him sick — are far more common than people acknowledge.

These habits have little to do with religious faith, which is much more complex because it involves large questions of morality, community and history. But magical thinking underlies a vast, often unseen universe of small rituals that accompany people through every waking hour of a day.

The appetite for such beliefs appears to be rooted in the circuitry of the brain, and for good reason. The sense of having special powers buoys people in threatening situations, and helps soothe everyday fears and ward off mental distress. In excess, it can lead to compulsive or delusional behavior. This emerging portrait of magical thinking helps explain why people who fashion themselves skeptics cling to odd rituals that seem to make no sense, and how apparently harmless superstition may become disabling.

The brain seems to have networks that are specialized to produce an explicit, magical explanation in some circumstances, said Pascal Boyer, a professor of psychology and anthropology at Washington University in St. Louis. In an e-mail message, he said such thinking was "only one domain where a relevant interpretation that connects all the dots, so to speak, is preferred to a rational one."

Children exhibit a form of magical thinking by about 18 months, when they begin to create imaginary worlds while playing. By age 3, most know the difference between fantasy and reality, though they usually still believe (with adult encouragement) in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy. By age 8, and sometimes earlier, they have mostly pruned away these beliefs, and the line between magic and reality is about as clear to them as it is for adults.

It is no coincidence, some social scientists believe, that youngsters begin learning about faith around the time they begin to give up on wishing. "The point at which the culture withdraws support for belief in Santa and the Tooth Fairy is about the same time it introduces children to prayer," said Jacqueline Woolley, a professor of psychology at the University of Texas. "The mechanism is already there, kids have already spent time believing that wishing can make things come true, and they're just losing faith in the efficacy of that."

If the tendency to think magically were no more than self-defeating superstition, then over the pitiless history of human evolution it should have all but disappeared in intellectually mature adults.

Yet in a series of experiments published last summer, psychologists at Princeton and Harvard showed how easy it was to elicit magical thinking in well-educated young adults. In one instance, the researchers had participants watch a blindfolded person play an arcade basketball game, and visualize success for the player. The game, unknown to the subjects, was rigged: the shooter could see through the blindfold, had practiced extensively and made most of the shots.

On questionnaires, the spectators said later that they had probably had some role in the shooter's success. A comparison group of participants, who had been instructed to visualize the player lifting dumbbells, was far less likely to claim such credit.

In another experiment, the researchers demonstrated that young men and women instructed on how to use a voodoo doll suspected that they might have put a curse on a study partner who feigned a headache. And they found, similarly, that devoted fans who watched the 2005 Super Bowl felt somewhat responsible for the outcome, whether their team won or lost. Millions in Chicago and Indianapolis are currently trying to channel the winning magic.

"The question is why do people create this illusion of magical power?" said the lead author, Emily Pronin, an assistant professor of psychology and public affairs at Princeton. "I think in part it's because we are constantly exposed to our own thoughts, they are most salient to us" — and thus we are likely to overestimate their connection to outside events.

The brain, moreover, has evolved to make snap judgments about causation, and will leap to conclusions well before logic can be applied. In an experiment presented last fall at the Society for Neuroscience meeting, Ben Parris of the University of Exeter in England presented magnetic resonance imaging scans taken from the brains of people watching magic tricks. In one, the magician performed a simple sleight of hand: he placed a coin in his palm, closed his fingers over it, then opened his hand to reveal that the coin was gone.

Dr. Parris and his colleagues found spikes of activity in regions of the left hemisphere of the brain that usually become engaged when people form hypotheses in uncertain situations.

These activations occur so quickly, other researchers say, that they often link two events based on nothing more than coincidence: "I was just thinking about looking up my high school girlfriend when out of the blue she called me," or, "The day after I began praying for a quick recovery, she emerged from the coma."

For people who are generally uncertain of their own abilities, or slow to act because of feelings of inadequacy, this kind of thinking can be an antidote, a needed activator, said Daniel M. Wegner, a professor of psychology at Harvard. (Dr. Wegner was a co-author of the voodoo study, with Kimberly McCarthy of Harvard and Sylvia Rodriguez of Princeton.)

"I deal with students like this all the time and I say, 'Let's get you overconfident,' " Dr. Wegner said. "This feeling that your thoughts can somehow control things can be a needed feeling" — the polar opposite of the helplessness, he added, that so often accompanies depression.

Magical thinking is most evident precisely when people feel most helpless. Giora Keinan, a professor at Tel Aviv University, sent questionnaires to 174 Israelis after the Iraqi Scud missile attacks of the 1991 gulf war. Those who reported the highest level of stress were also the most likely to endorse magical beliefs, like "I have the feeling that the chances of being hit during a missile attack are greater if a person whose house was attacked is present in the sealed room," or "To be on the safe side, it is best to step into the sealed room right foot first."

"It is of interest to note," Dr. Keinan concluded, "that persons who hold magical beliefs or engage in magical rituals are often aware that their thoughts, actions or both are unreasonable and irrational. Despite this awareness, they are unable to rid themselves of such behavior."

On athletic fields, at the craps table or out sailing in the open ocean, magical thinking is a way of life. Elaborate, entirely nonsensical rituals are performed with solemn deliberation, complete with theories of magical causation.

"I am hoping I do not change my clothes for the rest of the season, that I really start to stink," said Tom Livatino, head basketball coach at Lincoln Park High School in Chicago, who wears the same outfit as long as his team is winning. (And it usually does.)

The idea, Mr. Livatino said, is to do as much as possible to recreate the environment that surrounds his team's good play. He doesn't change his socks; he doesn't empty his pockets; and he works the sideline with the sense he has done everything possible to win. "The full commitment," he explained. "I'll do anything to give us an edge."

Only in extreme doses can magical thinking increase the likelihood of mental distress, studies suggest. People with obsessive-compulsive disorder are often nearly paralyzed by the convictions that they must perform elaborate rituals, like hand washing or special prayers, to ward off contamination or disaster. The superstitions, perhaps harmless at the outset, can grow into disabling defense mechanisms.

Those whose magical thoughts can blossom into full-blown delusion and psychosis appear to be a fundamentally different group in their own right, said Mark Lenzenweger, a professor of clinical science, neuroscience and cognitive psychology at Binghamton, part of the State University of New York. "These are people for whom magical thinking is a central part of how they view the world," not a vague sense of having special powers, he said. "Whereas with most people, if you were to confront them about their magical beliefs, they would back down."

Reality is the most potent check on runaway magical thoughts, and in the vast majority of people it prevents the beliefs from becoming anything more than comforting — and disposable — private rituals. When something important is at stake, a test or a performance or a relationship, people don't simply perform their private rituals: they prepare. And if their rituals start getting in the way, they adapt quickly.

Mr. Livatino lives and breathes basketball, but he also recently was engaged to be married.

"I can tell you she doesn't like the clothes superstition," he said. "She has made that pretty clear."

Comments 1 - 20 of 20 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #18832 by Logicel on January 23, 2007 at 5:27 am

 avatar"Reality is the most potent check on runaway magical thoughts, and in the vast majority of people it prevents the beliefs from becoming anything more than comforting — and disposable — private rituals. When something important is at stake, a test or a performance or a relationship, people don't simply perform their private rituals: they prepare. And if their rituals start getting in the way, they adapt quickly."
______

Fascinating article. Religion is magical thinking run amok?

Other Comments by Logicel

2. Comment #18844 by Kismettena on January 23, 2007 at 6:59 am

I really enjoyed this, thanks for posting.

Other Comments by Kismettena

3. Comment #18850 by Tycho the Dog on January 23, 2007 at 8:00 am

 avatarI also don't see a significant difference between this type of magical thinking and the average level of sophistication of religious belief. Both work as fear-derived superstition: if I don't pray to god the bad thing will happen; if I don't 'touch-wood' the bad thing will happen.

An interesting post.

Other Comments by Tycho the Dog

4. Comment #18859 by epeeist on January 23, 2007 at 9:16 am

 avatarFrom my avatar you can guess I am a fencing coach. There is an element of magical thinking in the way fencers prepare for a competition.

They will often follow a ritual set of movements in exactly the same order. However this is more aimed at generating focus than anything else. Interesting in his book "Harnessing Anger" Pete Westbrook describes a piece of gamesmanship to deliberately break this ritual in a UK fencer, James Williams.

Other Comments by epeeist

5. Comment #18870 by Luthien on January 23, 2007 at 10:31 am

 avatarPerhaps our ancestors instinctively recreated all the conditions present when something went well (like a hunt, or finding food), because they did not have the knowledge of the world that we have, and it was more beneficial to carry out "pointless" actions than to risk leaving them out and fail? This would explain their need to worship the elements of the environment that had the most impact in their lives (the sun, moon, or particular animals).

Other Comments by Luthien

6. Comment #18871 by StewartM on January 23, 2007 at 10:45 am

On a light-hearted note, many people are frustrated when they have to watch a sporting event on a delayed television broadcast (even when they don't know the result of the game) as they can't use "force of will" to deflect the opponent's kick away from the goal as it's already happened.

Other Comments by StewartM

7. Comment #18874 by RonnieG on January 23, 2007 at 11:14 am

All I can think of reading this is the Skinner box variation that Dr. Dawkins illustrated in Unweaving the Rainbow, where the pigeons become superstitious when food is released at random:

"One bird spun itself round like a top, two or three turns anticlockwise, between 'rewards'. Another bird repeatedly thrust its head towards one particular upper corner of the box. A third bird showed 'tossing' behavior, as if lifting an invisible curtain with its head. Two birds independently developed the habit of rhythmic, side-to-side 'pendulum swinging' of the head and body... It was the pigeon equivalent of a rain dance."

Other Comments by RonnieG

8. Comment #18880 by Chris Davis on January 23, 2007 at 12:09 pm

 avatarIt's hard to avoid the hypothesis that early magical thinking is the root of religion. The article hints that there must be some benefit to this adaptation, but that sounds to me like argumentum ad antiquitatem. Just because it's ubiquitous doesn't make it good. It could be a mental appendix.

There's also a belief that disillusioning kids about such rubbish - from Santa on down - will somehow damage or deprive them. Will it? As a kid I was entirely aware that I was neither cowboy nor Indian, cop nor robber, but it didn't stop me having fun shooting my little chums with my finger.

Have any of the logical positivists here assembled ever tried to raise a sprog without this crap? To let them know that magical thinking=make-believe right from the start?

CD

Other Comments by Chris Davis

9. Comment #18882 by Dogbreath on January 23, 2007 at 12:32 pm

 avatarComment #18880 by Chris Davis "Have any of the logical positivists here assembled ever tried to raise a sprog without this crap?"

I'm so pleased to see you haven't prejudged the outcome!

Other Comments by Dogbreath

10. Comment #18919 by Joadist on January 23, 2007 at 4:23 pm

There is a very important distinction between magical thinking and religion.

1: I do not change my socks because I believe that "MY" actions can alter the outcome of the game.

2: I do not change my socks because I believe that my actions can influence God to alter the outcome of the game.


Magic is based on the belief that we have power over the events in our lives. Religion is based on the belief that we have no power over the events in our lives.

Magical thinking is the opposite of religious thinking. Magical thinking is 'cause and effect'. Religious thinking is an appeal to divine intervention.

Other Comments by Joadist

11. Comment #18928 by Veronique on January 23, 2007 at 5:32 pm

 avatarJoadist - 18919

There is another difference between magic and religion. As pointed out in the article those adhering to magical practices and superstitions are aware of their illogicality and still adhere to their practices.

Religious people are unaware of their illogicality and truly believe in their religious superstitions and practices. :)

V

Other Comments by Veronique

12. Comment #18933 by mmurray on January 23, 2007 at 6:26 pm

 avatarComment #18880:

"Have any of the logical positivists here assembled ever tried to raise a sprog without this crap? To let them know that magical thinking=make-believe right from the start?"

We were pretty straight with ours. When they asked if Santa and the Toothfairy were real we just said no. We said nothing about any gods until the first one came home from their first day at school and said `who's this gwod person' ? We just told them some people believe in god but we don't.

Probably helps to live in Australia not the wrong parts of the US :-(

Michael

PS: It was gwod -- not a typo.

Other Comments by mmurray

13. Comment #18934 by melisande on January 23, 2007 at 6:35 pm

 avatar8. Comment #18880 by Chris Davis
Hey didn't they just find that the appendix actually has some useful properties??

Just sayin.

Other Comments by melisande

14. Comment #18943 by HappyPrimate on January 23, 2007 at 9:36 pm

 avatarI think our ancient ancestors felt very helpless in this world full of unpredictability and dangers and simply wanted some way to find a bit of contol (an edge) over the outcome of things in their lives. So if something good happened, just notice what you did right before it happened, and, next time you want that to happen again, do what you did before. If the good thing happened even once more, then you have a superstitution born. You must repeat that preceding action or the good thing won't happen and if it doesn't it could be a bad thing. Multiply that over the eons and you have a whole slew of superstitions that cover just about everything. Might even lead to religions?

Other Comments by HappyPrimate

15. Comment #18958 by Lord Asriel on January 24, 2007 at 1:54 am

 avatarJoadist wrote:
2: I do not change my socks because I believe that my actions can influence God to alter the outcome of the game.

You could also simply call it 'doing magic by proxy'. The underlying principle remains the same.

Other Comments by Lord Asriel

16. Comment #18968 by Joadist on January 24, 2007 at 4:12 am

Lord Asriel,

The underlying principle is only the same in the broadest possible interpretation.

Magical thinking isn't as much irrational as it is just 'bad science'. It is a blind guess as to whether a certain action can produce a certain result.

Our magical thinking ancestors tried to make fire by doing all manner of strange things to wood.

Our religious thinking ancestors tried to make fire without having any wood at all.

Ignorance and irrationality are not the same.

Other Comments by Joadist

17. Comment #18973 by Lord Asriel on January 24, 2007 at 5:33 am

 avatarJoadist,
I think magical thinking is very often more than just 'bad science' and inherently irrational. The article seems to agree with that view.
'It is of interest to note,' Dr. Keinan concluded, 'that persons who hold magical beliefs or engage in magical rituals are often aware that their thoughts, actions or both are unreasonable and irrational. Despite this awareness, they are unable to rid themselves of such behavior.'

But I think we agree on the basics. My comment was not meant to be critical of your post but aimed more at providing a slightly different viewpoint on the same distinction. Perhaps we should just say that if magical thinking is 'bad science', religion is worse as it is 'bad magical thinking' :-)

Lord Asriel

Other Comments by Lord Asriel

18. Comment #18977 by Azven on January 24, 2007 at 6:15 am

 avatarOur minds have a kind of Narrative Causality (a Terry Pratchett term, I think) in that we tend to connect two things into a story even if they are actually unrelated. [My favourite at the moment is seeing someone take out their mobile and dial a number, then someone else's phone (just a few feet away) rings and they answer it].

I can feel my own mind making these 'magic' connections all the time, but a nanoseconds conscious thought eliminates these (and they're easy to ignore).

It may be that the difference between an atheist and theist is that theists keep and use more of their unconscious connections.

Other Comments by Azven

19. Comment #19036 by ScienceBreath on January 24, 2007 at 1:01 pm

I've noticed a strong correlation between gullibility and religious beliefs. My fundie work colleagues are more inclined to get sucked in by urban myths, "suppressed" inventions, that sort of crap. They are also more inclined to like reading fantasy-type books (in addition to the bible).

(All based a sample of ~40 colleagues and ~4 fundies.)

Other Comments by ScienceBreath

20. Comment #19069 by Joadist on January 24, 2007 at 4:14 pm

Lord Asriel,

Thanks for the laugh :)

Magical thinking is an irrational view of reality.

Religious thinking is an irrational view of the imaginary.

Since the imaginary can be 'imagined' in any form, it takes a lot of effort to make it irrational.

Imagining a God is easy. Imagining him irrationally is quite an accomplishment.

Other Comments by Joadist
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: