Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Thursday, February 8, 2007 | Reason : Political | print version Print | Comments |

Document We all fund this torrent of Saudi bigotry

by Johann Hari, The Independent

Reposted from:
http://comment.independent.co.uk/columnists_a_l/johann_hari/article2248747.ece

hariJunkies don't talk back to their dealers. We are addicted to the Saudi oil supply

Which glossy brand name has been the biggest winner on the planetary roulette wheel of globalisation? Most of us could reel off a dozen eligible mega-corporations: Apple, Coca-Cola, McDonald's, the Nike swoosh. They are all wrong. The check-in-your-chips champion of globalisation is in fact a puritanical desert-nomad from the sands of Arabia who died in 1792, and the evidence was there in this week's Islamic panic front pages.

In his 18th-century oasis, Mohamed ibn Abd al-Wahhab Wahhab had a dream. He dreamed of an Islam stripped down to a cold list of mechanical rules, strictly enforced, severely upheld. He ordered whippings and beheadings of Muslims to "purify" the faith. He smashed up and burned down the worship places of the softer, more mystical Muslims all around him. And - his smartest move - he cut a deal. He met the chief of the desert bandits who lived in the nearby long stretch of sand called Najd - a man named Mohamed Saud - and offered him his allegiance, in return for enforcing his severe, new brand of Islam. The Saud ruling family and the Wahhabi doctrine have been locked in a stiff waltz ever since.

More than two centuries later, oil was discovered under the territory of these bandits, and billions of dollars began to soak into the Kingdom. True to their ancestor's deal, the House of Saud used this black gold to promote the ideas of Wahhab, no longer merely on their own sands, but across the world.

By paying for thousands of schools, mosques and trained imams, they dispersed the ideas of one reactionary little preacher to every continent. It has been a corporate strategy that leaves Ronald McDonald looking like a puffing, obese slouch. Slowly, steadily, they are succeeding in eroding other, gentler forms of Islam. They are globalising Wahhabism - and your petrol purchases are paying for it.

Which brings us to the swish, swanky classrooms of the King Fahd Academy in west London, in the year 2007. A Muslim teacher called Colin Cook has revealed that children there are taught, via Saudi textbooks, that Jews are "repugnant" and Christians are "pigs". Exercises for five-year olds include the charming exercise, "Mention some repugnant characteristics of Jews". Cook repeatedly heard children in the playground idolising Bin Laden. Challenged on Newsnight about whether she will stop using these racist books, the headteacher, Sumaya Alyusuf, said, "No... I cannot withdraw them. There are good chapters in the books."

Why are we surprised? The King Fahd Academy is not a freak. It is part of a deliberate globalised project, led by the House of Saud, that has been documented a hundred times. Azzedine Gaci, the head of the regional Muslim council, in Lyon, France, explains: "When Saudi Arabia gives you €1m with one hand, with the other they give you a list of what you must say or not say." Here's some of the things you can say, taken from standard-issue Saudi textbooks. For 10-year-olds: "The whole world should convert to Islam and leave its false religions lest their fate will be hell." For 12-year-olds: "There is a Jew behind me - come and kill him!"

And what can't you say? Anything about freedom for women, which is, the textbooks explain, "a continuation of the Crusades". A woman can only be taught to "enable her to be a successful housewife, an exemplary wife and a good mother". No need for maths or technology, shabibi, there's the kitchen. They are banned from any form of physical education, because it would be "obscene" for them to change their clothes outside the home. Besides, "they might become attracted to each other if they saw each other in leotards", in which case they would have to be killed.

These textbooks are not only being used in Riyadh and a few scattered outposts; let's look at two very different countries. In Sweden, almost every Islamic school is either funded by the Saudis or seeking out their cash, according to the investigative programme Kaliber. In Pakistan, there were 246 madrassas at the time of independence, in 1945. Today, there are 6,607 - the majority using these Saudi textbooks provided for nada. Every time you fill up with a fresh tank of petrol, you are helping to buy some more.

Moderate Muslims have been warning for decades that allowing children to be indoctrinated with this poison in their formative years kneecaps any attempt to stimulate less literalist readings of the Koran later in life. But where is the counter-offensive, siding with these decent Muslims against this wall of bigotry? There are 120 Muslim faith schools in Britain, many of which would not be financially viable without Saudi support. The Government proposes to build more. And in the mosques? Nobody seems to know how many of Britain's imams are trained by the Saudis.

In the US, the figure is 80 per cent, and in France it is 70 per cent. There was a taster of the Saudi mullah-training in a recent Dispatches documentary, in which the visiting Riyadh-trained cleric, Abu Usamah, raved in a Birmingham mosque that Jews and Christians are his "enemies", and called gay people "perverted, filthy dogs who should be murdered". The Government talked for a while about setting up programmes to train British imams, but the energy seems to have leached away.

Indeed, the Government paints persistently the House of Saud as "moderate", and Tony Blair is so close to the Saudi princes he just cancelled a corruption investigation into their relationship with BAE Systems. (Don't ask about the love-in between the House of Saud and the House of Bush, where, according to the expert Craig Unger, the Sauds have given more than $1bn to Bush's business ventures). As we allow this Wahabbi rollout, other forms of Islam are being ironed away. Wahhab is being posthumously granted his wish: for millions of Muslims, his is becoming the One True Faith.

Our governments are not stopping this Wahabbi-Saudi hate machine for a simple reason: as The New York Times writer Thomas Friedman puts it, junkies don't talk back to their dealers. We are addicted to the Saudi oil supply: it lubricates our cars, our planes, our food supply routes. In the face of this hunger, talk of national security or democratic ideals soon sinks into an oily gloop. Until we have built up clean, green alternatives to Middle Eastern oil (and isn't global warming reason enough?), you and I will keep paying at the petrol pump for this propaganda.

It's another ironic victory for globalisation: democrats in London are paying for fanatics in Arabia to indoctrinate children in Pakistan, and a thousand other places, and - yes - right back at us, at the end of the District line.

j.hari@ independent.co.uk

Comments 1 - 28 of 28 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #21202 by linck on February 8, 2007 at 2:54 am

 avatar- Besides, "they might become attracted to each other if they saw each other in leotards", in which case they would have to be killed -
Interesting that only women are in risk of getting aroused, circumsition probably immunizes men from sodomic thoughts.


It is truely weird that Afghanistan and Iraq were invaded by the grace of Bush because of their role in international terrorism, but everybody has a blind spot for Saudi Arabia.
I am definately not suggesting that his Bushiness will pull another stunt by following the will of God and Ann Coulter!

Other Comments by linck

2. Comment #21203 by MacGruder on February 8, 2007 at 2:56 am

1. This guy has guts
2. Will be interesting to see if anyone refutes his claims

Mike Moore has previously made links between the House of Bush and the House of Saud, but I haven't seen the mainstream media run with the story. I await other bloggers' responses to this story...

Other Comments by MacGruder

3. Comment #21205 by epeeist on February 8, 2007 at 2:59 am

 avatarNo, no it simply can't be true. After all GWB has declared Saudi Arabia to be a "moderate" ally - see this article in the Washington Post for confirmation.

Other Comments by epeeist

4. Comment #21224 by NJS on February 8, 2007 at 4:46 am

I agree with the intended anti-Saudi thrust but at the same time there is nothing in those book extracts that isn't echoed to the same degree in both the Koran and the Bible.

I would love someone to bring a test case against the publishers of those holy books under the religious hatred incitement laws.

Other Comments by NJS

5. Comment #21230 by dmcr35 on February 8, 2007 at 5:58 am

 avatarHere's rundown on the Wahhabi outlook on life from Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahhabism

Michael Moore connected the dots when he questioned why no investigation of Saudi involvement was made considering that 17 of the 19 (I believe) perpetrators of 9/11 were Saudis.

Dave

Other Comments by dmcr35

6. Comment #21232 by Suffolk Blue on February 8, 2007 at 6:13 am

NJS - you mean try the Koran & the Bible under the incitement to religious hatred laws?!? I love it! :-)

Other Comments by Suffolk Blue

7. Comment #21234 by PrimeNumbers on February 8, 2007 at 6:41 am

 avatarYes, those books should have any element in them that incites hatred removed. The remaining Bible, being full of sex should therefore only be allowed to be sold in licenced sex shops.

Other Comments by PrimeNumbers

8. Comment #21240 by Michael on February 8, 2007 at 7:45 am

Johann Hari is a very perceptive journalist and an atheist to boot. Islaam is as he portrays, a frightening religion that has not been modified by any 'enlightenment'. Not only is it persistently brutal but it is so closely integrated with politics and power. The mullah at the head of Hizbollah or Muqtadah al Sadr (sp?) in Iraq show that religion and political power one and the same. As for Saudi; petrodollars are preparing for universal Islaam and the Wahabi version at that. Western democracies had better watch out.

Other Comments by Michael

9. Comment #21242 by MouthAlmighty on February 8, 2007 at 7:56 am

 avatarMaybe I'm being naive, but would we really run the risk of the Saudi government cutting off our 'fix' of oil by excluding certain abhorrent teaching practices in our schools? Irrational as their beliefs may be, I don't think that such action would be enough for them to give up their income. Surely the Saudi oil industry isn't merely a front for the spread of Wahabism.

Other Comments by MouthAlmighty

10. Comment #21245 by Friend Giskard on February 8, 2007 at 8:11 am

 avatarIslam must be destroyed.

Other Comments by Friend Giskard

11. Comment #21247 by epeeist on February 8, 2007 at 8:28 am

 avatarComment #21242 by MouthAlmighty
Maybe I'm being naive, but would we really run the risk of the Saudi government cutting off our 'fix' of oil by excluding certain abhorrent teaching practices in our schools?

It isn't a matter of them actually doing anything, all they need to wait for is other countries to cave in. It has already happened in the case of BAE (See http://www.guardian.co.uk/armstrade/story/0,,1994113,00.html for details.)

Note that there are up to 9 periods of religious studies per week at Saudi schools and over a third of university students take theology, so this is something the Saudis take seriously.

Other Comments by epeeist

12. Comment #21248 by blaine on February 8, 2007 at 8:29 am

Bush's big concession to environmentalism and US political independence is to cut US dependence upon oil by 20% within 10 years (I may not have the numbers exactly right... can't find the artilce). BFD! If he seriously wanted to significantly improve policitical independence or environmentalism, he could easily cut dependence by more than half. He could easily get a grass roots majority on board by using his proven strategy of leveraging patriotic fear. That route, however, would be less profitable for the American oil and automotive companies which butter his bread.

Other Comments by blaine

13. Comment #21254 by MouthAlmighty on February 8, 2007 at 9:14 am

 avatarHi epeeist,

I'm not sure how the BAE scandal is relevant. It seems to me to be more about commercial bribery and the avoidance of such coming out in public. I understand that the Saudis have an uncomfortable amount of clout in the west and the more we can do to undermine that the better. But this is for reasons entirely separate from the Saudi schools panic promoted in the article. The thrust of the article is that the Saudi schools are able to prosper merely because of our dependence on oil. I just don't buy it.

The article seems to be a plea for more ecologically sound energy resources using the threat of an encroaching Wahabi invasion as an additional arm-twister.

Other Comments by MouthAlmighty

14. Comment #21260 by Lionel A on February 8, 2007 at 9:54 am

 avatarComment #21203 by MacGruder

I am in agreement with you, that columnist sure has guts. We can be almost sure of a backlash.

As for Bush and Saud, that Craig Unger's book 'House of Bush House of Saud' cited by Johann Hari is well worth looking up. I have a copy which has 'BANNED BY AMAZON.CO.UK' emblazoned on its cover, although purchased in a UK chain shop, make of that what you will.

Excerpts can be found here:

http://www.houseofbush.com/

Another worth a look is 'American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush' by Kevin Phillips which along with Michael C Ruppert's 'Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil' amongst a number of others will help to provide insights into events since Bush took office, and before.

(PS this is the third time I have written all this and lost it when the page could not be fetched on Preview. Replying here is like wading through treacle ATM, must be the cold.)

Other Comments by Lionel A

15. Comment #21266 by Jez on February 8, 2007 at 10:37 am

The newsletters by Herb Mallard are a good guide to the Saudi's influence and corruption:

http://www.sauduction.com/welcome.html

"The princes ship in whiskey and women, laughing in the face of Islam. They rule the people with a tyrannical, unforgiving grip. But because it's America that pays for the oil... and American soldiers on the bases... it's the Americans that fundamentalists blame for all the excesses."

Other Comments by Jez

16. Comment #21267 by Pantore on February 8, 2007 at 10:49 am

 avatar"you and I will keep paying at the petrol pump for this propaganda."

Or just don't drive a car and stop supporting the oil-barons and automobile-maffia.
It saves you a lot of money as well.

Other Comments by Pantore

17. Comment #21269 by blaine on February 8, 2007 at 10:57 am

Re: Lionel A's PS:

Frustrating, but it takes a special kind of pertinacity to not copy your text to your system clipboard after keying it all in for the 2nd time. :)

Other Comments by blaine

18. Comment #21275 by NJS on February 8, 2007 at 11:29 am

"NJS - you mean try the Koran & the Bible under the incitement to religious hatred laws?!? I love it! :-)"

Yes I do - At the start of the Abu Hamza trial the prosecutor stated that Islam and the Koran weren't on trial - if I'd been Hamza's lawyer I'd have made it about that and used "simply preaching the holy book" as a defence to show up the laws.

Don't get me wrong I think Hamza was/is rotten but his actual preaching is just plain Islam.

I think if the government want to pass stupid laws then people should show them up for what they are.

If I started a "religion" based on a book as intolerant, sexist, racist, homophobic and just plain nasty as those two the organisation would be banned - why are the existing theist hate manifestos exempt?

Other Comments by NJS

19. Comment #21286 by Lionel A on February 8, 2007 at 1:35 pm

 avatarblaine

Sure the clipboard was useful but that did not survive a system crash (I had installed new software AM and I think its call home failed). It would have been four times if I had not created and saved a text file on the third time. ;-)

Other Comments by Lionel A

20. Comment #21288 by blaine on February 8, 2007 at 1:58 pm

Re: NJS

Well put.

Other Comments by blaine

21. Comment #21290 by epeeist on February 8, 2007 at 2:29 pm

 avatarComment #21254 by MouthAlmighty
I'm not sure how the BAE scandal is relevant.

It is a commercial bribery situation. However, it is relevant in that it looks as though political pressure was put on the Serious Fraud Office at the behest of the Saudi government.

The investigation being conducted by the SFO was wound up by Lord Goldsmith. It would seem, according to http://politics.guardian.co.uk/constitution/story/0,,2003942,00.html, that continuing the investigation could have meant putting several Saudi royal family members in the dock.

Other Comments by epeeist

22. Comment #21344 by Shuggy on February 8, 2007 at 9:02 pm

 avatarLinck wrote in Comment 1:
"circumsition probably immunizes men from sodomic thoughts."
Hardly, when something like 85% of US men are circumcised. (Curious that he's only one letter away from "circumstition": see http://www.circumstitions.com)

The substantive story is terrifying: but what proportion of world oil is Saudi? As consumers, have we any choice?

Other Comments by Shuggy

23. Comment #21461 by bradpitcher on February 9, 2007 at 9:15 am

 avatar"Or just don't drive a car and stop supporting the oil-barons and automobile-maffia"

This is my approach. I won't drive a car again until we no longer rely on them for oil.

Fight terror, ride a bike!

Other Comments by bradpitcher

24. Comment #21511 by Spinoza on February 9, 2007 at 3:47 pm

 avatarThere's nothing "wrong" with circumcision. In fact, it has several awesome benefits. ;-)

1. Now proved to reduce risk of AIDS
2. According to many women it looks nicer.
3. It is EASIER to keep clean (obviously it's clean after you shower regardless, but you SWEAT... and that is not tasty after being under foreskin... hahaha)
4. It does deaden nerves... but this allows men to last longer! (and I have honestly never heard of a circumcised man complaining about how shitty his orgasms were.... COMPARED TO WHAT?)
5. Yeah I thought perhaps it shouldn't be done without the consent of the child.. but then they might just be pissed when they got older that you didn't get it done for them when they were too young to be fully conscious of the pain! (or at least, to remember) lol.

Other Comments by Spinoza

25. Comment #21596 by blackbeauty on February 10, 2007 at 3:41 am

I feel relieved that I no longer use a car and fund the spread of ignorance and hate. But unwittingly I may still support this in some unknown ways. The whole world's intelligentia should come together and make sure there is a majority opinion to stop this.
Let us start here.

Other Comments by blackbeauty

26. Comment #21628 by Richard Dawkins on February 10, 2007 at 7:57 am

 avatarI wrote to Johann Hari to congratulate him warmly on the above article. In his reply, he told me a nice story. As follows:-

"I have been meaning to get in touch because I was out in Jerusalem in December (my worst place on earth) for work and sitting by the wailing wall I saw a young guy in Orthodox Jewish robes sitting with all the other, wailing, shaking types, and I noticed over his shoulder that he was reading... The God Delusion!

I took him for a coffee and he said he was "having doubts" and the book was having a huge impact on him. I have forwarded him your e-mail address, I hope you don't mind.

Another mind rescued!

Best wishes
Johann"

Other Comments by Richard Dawkins

27. Comment #22800 by laks.84 on February 22, 2007 at 5:57 pm

I can relate very well to the situation the young guy went through.
I started having doubts a long time ago, but there was no one to turn to for guidance or support. I even thought it was the DEVIL!!

But then I happened to watch the awesome documentary "root cause of all evil". At that instant, everything became crystal clear. I felt liberated and enlightened.

Dr.Dawkins has inspired me to such an extent that my friends have started addressing me as "Dawkin's Rotweiler" , though I am not so agressive!!

Other Comments by laks.84

28. Comment #24482 by Veronique on March 6, 2007 at 9:14 pm

 avatarNJS

Your new 'religion' would never get off the ground as you well know.

If cigarettes were brought fresh onto the market now, the product would be banned under public health legislation.

The big problem is that cigarettes and alcohol have been around for so long, that while they are tut tutted at, they are part of the social fabric. Don't get me wrong, I indulge happily in both.

The same applies to these old religions. Your new 'religion' of hate, intolerance, sexism etc would end up being banned under appropriate legislation.

I too love the idea of bring a massive class action against these purveyors of hate!! How would you envisage putting the religions on trial? There are a lot that preach bigotry, death to apostates and the rest of their awful stuff. Would you pick one sect or cult as a test case? Under which jurisdiction would you bring such an action?

I could get quite carried away here. It is such a gorgeous fantasy.

Sigh
V

Other Comments by Veronique
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: