Why Dawkins's case against religion creaks at every joint

Thanks to beebub and Con Tigo for the link

RITE AND REASON: A leap of faith is required to accept the argument offered by Richard Dawkins

RICHARD DAWKINS sold himself very short indeed in Dublin recently. For he was mainly concerned with securing the claim that “if science can’t get at the truth, nothing else can”; and then with securing not just the equality but the superiority of science over religions and their theologies.

So he insisted, first, that science entertains “much mystery and magic of its own”; and, second, that the queen of science on the contemporary scene, quantum physics, reveals mysteries that would be “well beyond the impoverished imaginings of any theologian”.

Dawkins’s case is built on twin platforms. First, that evolution offers a full and adequate explanation of how the world came to be as we now know it; and this makes creator gods superfluous.

Then, second, that creator gods, and especially the Christian version, are nothing short of agents of immorality, both by example and in terms of their actual moral teachings, and the horrendous punishments threatened to enforce these.

All of which nullifies any remaining possibility of good moral behaviour on the part of a race already apparently only too prone to immorality, and increasingly so as its powers of destruction grow apace.

Read more

TAGGED: EVOLUTION, MORALITY, RELIGION, RICHARD DAWKINS


RELATED CONTENT

Moral Clarity and Richard Dawkins

Carson - Reasons for God 91 Comments

What kind of meta-ethical foundation has Dawkins provided for his ‘moral home’?

The Moral Necessity of a Godless...

Tauriq Moosa - big think 73 Comments

The Moral Necessity of a Godless Existence

UPDATED: Why I want all our children to...

Richard Dawkins - The Observer 173 Comments

Whatever else the Bible might be – and it really is a great work of literature – it is not a moral book and young people need to learn that important fact because they are very frequently told the opposite.

Who matters (or should) when scientists...

Janet D. Stemwedel - Scientific... 7 Comments

Who matters (or should) when scientists engage in ethical decision-making?

Bioethicist Richard Dawkins: Morality,...

Sean DeButts - BellevuePatch 36 Comments

Bioethicist Richard Dawkins: Morality, Society Can Be "Intelligently Designed"

MORE

MORE BY JAMES MACKEY

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment