Evolution, Christmas and the Atonement
By DENIS ALEXANDER - THE GUARDIAN COMMENT IS FREE
Added: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:58:45 UTC
Given the fact of human evolution, here is a good question for Christmas: if we last shared a common ancestor with the chimps about 5-6 million years ago, and humans have been gradually emerging through a series of hominid intermediates ever since, then why did Jesus die? The connection of thought here might not be immediately apparent. But behind the question lies about 1,600 years or more of church history.
Augustine, Bishop of Hippo (354–430), whose influence, both brilliant and perverse, continues to the present day, is an informative place to start. Augustine believed that the Adam and Eve of the Genesis text were the progenitors of all humankind. When they disobeyed God and were cast out of the Garden of Eden, their sin was then inherited by all succeeding generations: the doctrine of "original sin". Their disobedience became known as the "Fall" (a word not used in the Bible) and Augustine's doctrine of original sin was soon ratified by successive church councils, the Council of Carthage (418) declaring that human mortality was a consequence of the Fall. The focus of Christ's death on the cross – the Atonement – then became Christ's sacrifice for the sin of Adam, whose disobedience had led to the consequent physical death of all humanity.
If the Augustinian account is correct, then there is clear incompatibility with evolution, in which anatomically modern humans first start appearing in Africa about 200,000 years ago through a process involving countless deaths over thousands of generations.
So do we then just shrug our shoulders and say "well so much the worse for theology – science wins in the end"? Surprisingly, perhaps, the Bible suggests otherwise.
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Will Self - BBC News Magazine 100 Comments
We chase "fast culture" at our peril - unusual words and difficult art are good for us, says Will Self.
Annie Murphy Paul - New York Times 24 Comments
New support for the value of fiction is arriving from an unexpected quarter: neuroscience.
The spectre of militant secularism
Nick Cohen - The Spectator 40 Comments
If you turn on the news tonight and hear of a bomber slaughtering civilians anywhere from Nigeria to the London Underground, I can reassure you of one point: the bombers will not be readers of Richard Dawkins.
A brutal price still paid for daring to...
Amol Rajan - The Independent 39 Comments
Their assault illustrates the extent to which defenders of religion still dominate our press, the brutal retaliation exacted on clever opponents of faith and the incorrigible stupidity of Sayeeda Warsi's claim about "militant secularism" last week.
The Sins of the Fathers [Also in Polish]
Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 341 Comments
I can’t help wondering at the quality of journalism which sees a scoop in attacking a man for what his five-greats grandfather did.
The Devil, the internet, Richard...
Stephen Bayley - Telegraph blogs 138 Comments
Which, talking of dissimulation, brings me to Richard Dawkins, a fanatic disguised as a scientist.



















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page