Baby steps versus long jumps: The "size" of evolutionary change, and why it matters
By JEREMY YODER - DENIM AND TWEED
Added: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:03:53 UTC

Evolution can make leaps—but how frequently? Photo by Flavio Martins.
Does evolutionary change happen in big jumps, or a series of small steps? The question may seem a little esoteric to non-scientists—how many mutations can dance on the head of a pin?—but it has direct implications for how we identify the genetic basis of human diseases, or desirable traits in domestic plants and animals.
That's because the evolutionary path by which a particular phenotype, or visible trait, first evolved in a population is closely related to the genetics that underlie the trait in the present. Phenotypes that arose in a single mutational jump will probably remain connected to one or a few genes with large effects; phenotypes that evolved more gradually do so because they are created by the collective action of many genes. So what kind of evolutionary change is most common will determine which kind of gene-to-phenotype relationships we should expect to find.
In an excellent recent review article for the journal Evolution, Matthew Rockman, a biologist with the Department of Biology and Center for Genomics and Systems Biology at New York University, makes the case that the era of genomics has, so far, been much too focused on finding genes of large effect. Fortunately, Rockman also sees the beginnings of a new movement towards acknowledging the importance of small-effect genes—one which may ultimately make genomic association studies more useful.
Read more
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Human Evolution Isn't What It Used to Be
Matt Ridley - Wall Street Journal... 8 Comments
Recent analyses of the human genome reveal a huge number of rare—and therefore probably fairly new—mutations.
Richard Dawkins - Prospect 23 Comments
Richard Dawkins's review of The Social Conquest of Earth, by Edward O Wilson (WW Norton, £18.99, May)
Ancient walking mystery deepens
Helen Briggs - BBC News - Science &... 7 Comments
One of the first creatures to step on land could not have walked on four legs, 3D computer models show.
Human Races May Have Biological...
Razib Khan - The Crux - Discover... 89 Comments
Human Races May Have Biological Meaning, But Races Mean Nothing About Humanity
Darwinian Selection Continues to...
- - ScienceDaily 45 Comments
New evidence proves humans are continuing to evolve and that significant natural and sexual selection is still taking place in our species in the modern world.
Where's the Beef? Early Humans Took It
Ann Gibbons - Science - AAAS.org 7 Comments
Cool cats. The skull and jaw of two different species of extinct saber-toothed cats, which lived during the heyday of carnivores 3 million to 3.5 million years ago in the Turkana Basin of Kenya.
Credit: Lars Werdelin/© National Museums of Kenya



















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page