1. Comment #24834 by neander on March 8, 2007 at 7:13 pm

Good stuff!

Other Comments by neander

2. Comment #24835 by kkant on March 8, 2007 at 7:17 pm

This was absolutely hilarious. Thanks for the link. :)

Other Comments by kkant

3. Comment #24839 by Noein on March 8, 2007 at 8:08 pm

lol that was great! Thanks for that

Other Comments by Noein

4. Comment #24843 by Mroberts3 on March 8, 2007 at 8:32 pm

Funny because it's true. When you step back and look at things like this you realize what a gigantic joke we-ahem-some, of us all are.

Other Comments by Mroberts3

5. Comment #24848 by Robert Maynard on March 8, 2007 at 9:10 pm

Man, this takes me back.
My dad has a few of the old This Modern World print collections, all the way back to when Bush Snr. was the President.

Razor sharp stuff.

EDIT: On that note: This Modern World

Other Comments by Robert Maynard

6. Comment #24851 by Shuggy on March 8, 2007 at 9:42 pm

"Sphericated or Flaticular"? Love it!

Other Comments by Shuggy

7. Comment #24855 by MelM on March 8, 2007 at 10:12 pm

From Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Flat_Earth_Society


The cutting edge of our new direction in science:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/

From the FAQ:

Q: "Why do the all the world Governments say the Earth is round?"

A: It's a conspiracy

Q: "What about NASA? Don't they have photos to prove that the Earth is round?"

A: NASA is part of the conspiracy too. The photos are faked.

Q: "Why has no-one taken a photo of the Earth that proves it is flat?"

A: The government prevents people from getting close enough to the Ice Wall to take a picture.

Q: "How did NASA create these images with the computer technology available at the time?"

A: Since NASA did not send rockets into space, they instead spent the money on developing advanced computers and imaging software instead

Other Comments by MelM

8. Comment #24858 by Feuerbach on March 8, 2007 at 11:09 pm

I have been informationalised, thankyou.

Other Comments by Feuerbach

9. Comment #24864 by scottishgeologist on March 9, 2007 at 12:29 am

Reminds me of the Chick Trabcts web site:

http://www.chick.com/catalog/tractlist.asp

(Warning: seriously fundie stuff , and its serious, its not a joke...)

Or if you want cloying creationist BS, try "After Eden"

http://www.answersingenesis.org/aftereden/index.aspx

These are seriously emetic.

Of course if you want PROPER "AFter Eden" stuff:

http://www.contessa.co.uk/after-eden.asp

Hah! now were talking!

Other Comments by scottishgeologist

10. Comment #24903 by Luthien on March 9, 2007 at 5:34 am

Hey MelM, I also found this beauty on that page:

Q: Follow-up to previous question: How is it that the Earth does not have a gravitational pull, but stars and the moon do?

A: This argument is a non sequitur. You might as well ask, "How is it that snakes do not have legs, but dogs and cats do?" Snakes are not dogs or cats. The Earth is not a star or the moon. It doesn't follow that each must have exactly the properties of the others, and no more.


Other Comments by Luthien

11. Comment #24911 by themoonsays on March 9, 2007 at 7:16 am

I thought the earth was flatulent.

Other Comments by themoonsays

12. Comment #24927 by sid13 on March 9, 2007 at 10:25 am

My favorite part, from the penultimate box (as a secondary headline in that newspaper):-

"Democrats Fail to Pass Symbolic Non-binding Resolution Declaring Earth Not Flat"..

:D

Other Comments by sid13

13. Comment #24928 by karlJ on March 9, 2007 at 10:30 am

Damn Liberals!
Of course the earth is flat! Just look out the window and see for yourselves!
Well, at least flattish, sort of.... I see a bump some distance away, but I'm sure the rest is really flat.

Other Comments by karlJ

14. Comment #24947 by JDAM on March 9, 2007 at 12:47 pm

OK...Tom Tomorrow is a funny and satirical guy who makes a living lampooning Conservatives. I've laughed my head off at much of his stuff but why is this here? Do the Dawkins web site managers feel an overwhelming necessity to make sure that all who come here understand that they are flaming Libs first? Or is this as close as TT will ever get to lampooning stupid religious arguments? Yeesh!!

Other Comments by JDAM

15. Comment #25000 by Zaphod on March 9, 2007 at 3:47 pm

Great comic.

Other Comments by Zaphod

16. Comment #25005 by Monsterbeach on March 9, 2007 at 4:18 pm

"I'll believe anything that annoys a Liberal" Human nature? (Opposite stand. Argument not important)

Other Comments by Monsterbeach

17. Comment #25053 by Fouad Boussetta on March 9, 2007 at 11:36 pm

That's just hilarious, ... and so true!
I just emailed this comic strip to everyone.
Thanks for the fun.

Other Comments by Fouad Boussetta

18. Comment #25301 by Brungardt on March 11, 2007 at 9:34 pm

Hilarious but the top right panel was slightly ... depressing. "Can I have my check now?" I should hope no scientist would sacrifice his credibility for a cheap buck and Conservative talking heads.

Other Comments by Brungardt

19. Comment #25373 by losferwords on March 12, 2007 at 6:06 pm

Great stuff, love it!!! Great informationalisation!!! Or is that "informationalisationism??"

Other Comments by losferwords