Richard Dawkins and John Lennox at the Oxford University Museum







This is the third of my encounters with John Lennox, all organized by the Fixed Point Foundation, which is an American Christian organization.

The first one, before a large audience in Birmingham, Alabama, had a rather odd format, which was set up in such a way that Lennox got the last word on every question. The second, in a private room in Trinity College, Oxford, was a quiet conversation with no audience. For me it was notable because Lennox belied the common claims of 'sophisticated theologians' by coming clean about his own beliefs. This sophisticated Oxford don, it turned out, believes in all the New Testament miracles including walking on water and turning water into wine. This extremely surprising revelation formed the premise of my opening remarks in our third debate, in the Oxford University Museum, on October 21st 2008. I contrasted his theistic beliefs in miracles with deistic beliefs, for which I said that a serious case could be made, although not a case that I would accept myself. Lennox did not pick up on this at the time but, astonishingly, he made it one of his central points in a speech that he made in Inverness a few days later:"

http://www.uhi.ac.uk/home/about-uhi/lectures/lectures/dr-john-lennox/

Here is the relevant part of Lennox's Inverness speech:

"But finally, and this is the grand irony, I was stunned last Tuesday night – completely stunned – by this. Richard Dawkins started off by saying that he had no difficulty with the concept of Einstein’s god . . . but now came the stunning revelation. And I missed it in one sense and when the lecture was over I realised what he had said. He said a good case could be made for the deistic god. That’s staggering."


If you listen now to the debate in Oxford of Tuesday 21st October, you can hear for yourself the remark that 'stunned' John Lennox, my alleged concession to deism.

-Richard Dawkins

TAGGED: RICHARD DAWKINS, SPEECHES


RELATED CONTENT

Moral Clarity and Richard Dawkins

Carson - Reasons for God 17 Comments

What kind of meta-ethical foundation has Dawkins provided for his ‘moral home’?

No blood on the carpet. How...

Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 173 Comments

[Journalists] seem to feel let down when they discover that the real people aren't anything like the way they so relentlessly portray us; as if, since they've gone to the trouble of inventing extravagant caricatures of us, we should at least have the decency to live up to them in real life.
Also in Polish

UPDATED: Why I want all our children to...

Richard Dawkins - The Observer 159 Comments

Whatever else the Bible might be – and it really is a great work of literature – it is not a moral book and young people need to learn that important fact because they are very frequently told the opposite.

Richard Dawkins - US October 2012 Tour

- - RichardDawkins.net 26 Comments

[Update - statement from CfI ]Secular...

Press Release - Center for Inquiry 88 Comments

Atheist group sues Rochester Hills country club over canceled speech

Richard Dawkins Has a Point, Your...

Michael J. Matt - The Remnant 147 Comments

In sum, according to Cardinal Pell: Man certainly did evolve from monkeys, Adam and Eve were not actual people, Genesis is a myth, atheists certainly go to heaven, and homosexuals, far from living a sinful lifestyle, are perfectly free to have unions (whatever that means!).

With friends like these running His Church why would God need enemies?

MORE

MORE BY RICHARD DAWKINS, JOHN LENNOX

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment