Friend Giskard's Profile

Friend Giskard's Avatar Joined over 5 years ago
Gender: Male

Latest Discussions Started by Friend Giskard

More Discussions by Friend Giskard

Latest Comments by Friend Giskard

Go to: Child abuse overshadows another scandal – the Church’s abuse of women

Friend Giskard's Avatar Jump to comment 5 by Friend Giskard

...victims of sexual exploitation by clergy often also suffer loss of faith...
Every cloud has a silver lining.

Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:26:00 UTC | #455268

Go to: Richard Dawkins interview on religion, evolution and Iraq

Friend Giskard's Avatar Jump to comment 5 by Friend Giskard

they are now doing what Christianity used to do in the Middle Ages, in much more dangerous circumstances because now there are much more terrible weapons than the Crusaders, for example, ever had.
This is quite right, of course, but, as I was reading it, the thought occurred to me the the absence of nuclear weapons in the 11th century did not prevent the crusaders from going nuclear on the people of Jerusalem when they invaded that city. They slaughtered the entire population, numbering tens of thousands. Bloody crusaders.

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:52:00 UTC | #451140

Go to: Dismiss dinosaurs as failures...and pave a path to a bleak future

Friend Giskard's Avatar Jump to comment 3 by Friend Giskard

The saying is, actually, 'Dead as a dodo'.

And I dispute that dinosaurs are frequently cited as the ultimate exemplars of failure.

Who thumbs their nose at dinosaurs, and laughs derisively at their present-day absence? Nobody. That never happens.

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:36:00 UTC | #451131

Go to: AC Grayling and Russell Blackford discuss Atheism

Friend Giskard's Avatar Jump to comment 6 by Friend Giskard

I could hear it better when I set my computer's audio manager to 'Rock'.

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:29:00 UTC | #450851

Go to: Mysterious 'Dark Flow' May Be Tug of Other Universe

Friend Giskard's Avatar Jump to comment 6 by Friend Giskard

One million miles per hour relative to what?

Edit: I see from Wikipedia that it is relative to the cosmic background radiation (which I congratulate myself on having sort of guessed).

Edit 2: Oh wait. The article says that the flow dates back to the first fraction of a second. But the origin of the cosmic background radiation is much more recent than that. So I'm still in baffled.

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:13:00 UTC | #450845

More Comments by Friend Giskard