Richard Carrier: Mythic Jesus More Probable Than Historic Jesus
Historian Dr. Richard Carrier discusses his scholarly theory for a mythical Jesus in his peer reviewed book, On the Historicity of Jesus, Why We Have Reason For Doubt. Carrier is a philosopher and historian with degrees from Berkeley and Columbia, specializing in the contemporary philosophy of naturalism, and in Greco-Roman philosophy, science, and religion, including the origins of Christianity. The gospels, and the book of Acts, are unreliable, writes Carrier, and the Epistles contain an alarming and surprising lack of historical data. The extra-biblical evidence is no help to the historicist, either, as it provides no reliable data on a living Jesus, as well. For example, passages mentioning Jesus in the Ancient historian Josephus’ work were most likely not original, but added later by Christian scribes. Carrier concludes that mythicism is far more probable than a historical Jesus. Carrier draws upon mainstream scholarship in the field of biblical studies, and also uses Bayes’ Theorem to assess the historical evidence.