Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)

Comments by Stuey


1. I Believe In Evolution, Except For The Whole Triassic Period

Comment #46723 by Stuey on June 1, 2007 at 9:25 am

MAS2007 was right at the beginning and it isn't a question of personal taste. This is simply a waste of life, and satire at it's very worst. It's extremely very dull to read. It's really insulting when people say "You just don't get satire!" I live in England (for God's sake?) and we invented the concept.

2. The God question

Comment #44293 by Stuey on May 24, 2007 at 6:17 am

Who cares about reviews of the truth? And non-believers giving their opinion of the review smacks of the new church of Dawkins. This isn't the new faith, people!! It's just the simple truth as far as evidence shows it.

I seriously worry about the Dawkins Devout approach.

3. Dental healer finds share of faithful believers

Comment #44292 by Stuey on May 24, 2007 at 6:11 am

So after they filed out of the tent in the evening, did they all file into MacDonalds the next day? What is it about MacDonalds and the healing of teeth? Have Burger King seen through this flame-grilled whopping lie?

God Bless America. Land of the free, home of the brave, tent of the maniac.

4. The Conversion of the Casual Evolutionist - You can't spell love without evolve

Comment #44286 by Stuey on May 24, 2007 at 5:17 am

I'm really bored of people mentioning Richard Dawkins' books as having CONVINCED them of Evolution or the non-exitence of God. Using the word "convinced" suggests that Dawkins is trying to pursuade us to believe when, in reality, all Dawkins has done is written a record of absolute truth. If someone has needed to be convinced of the truth then I feel sympathy for them for being so deluded but at the same time I feel enraged by them for thinking that their ability to be convinced or otherwise has any bearing on either the truth or the massive intellect or Richard Dawkins. GET A LIFE, PLEBS!!! YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT NOR THE INTELLECT TO VOICE YOUR OPINIONS RELATING TO THE TRUTH. I LIKE BRICKS BECAUSE THEY MAKE MY HOUSE BUT THAT IS OF NO INTEREST TO ANYONE!!!!

5. Bill O'Remix

Comment #35411 by Stuey on April 27, 2007 at 4:44 am

I have never said this about anyone in my life before but Bill O'Reilly makes my skin creep. I couldn't care less about his stupid views or his disgusting manners, but there is just something so creepy about him!

Does anyone else feel this? I mean, I know he's American, but does he really have to be so revolting? :)

6. The God disunion: there is a place for faith in science, insists Winston

Comment #35405 by Stuey on April 27, 2007 at 4:33 am

Good old Bobby Winston! He's responsible for bringing loads more people into an already over-populated world. I wonder what his God thinks of that? PLANET WRECKER!
I'm so glad that his TV programmes have always been too boring to watch.

7. Atheism isn't the final word

Comment #32680 by Stuey on April 18, 2007 at 2:27 am

Humility is a Darwinian concept. Many animals use humility to position themselves in the hierachy of their groups. That was happening several million years before man arrived. How exhausting. Makes me glad even more glad to be alive and living in the UK!

8. Doctors Opposing Circumcision: An Appeal for Misha

Comment #32524 by Stuey on April 17, 2007 at 9:07 am

The foreskin's design, when in the forward position, allows for easier (and more comfortable)entry into the vagina. To remove it, regardless of the victim's age, is cutting off a perfect design of evolution.

I think it's pointless to make any comparisons to America because they are a meaningless nation of God nutters.