1. We need a more intelligent religion debate

Comment #68444 by cjs1892 on September 7, 2007 at 7:44 am

I love the logical fallacies that he uses to misrepresent Hitchens position. For example "religion is false and therefore harmful". NO! Religion is false because it is false and harmful because it is harmful. To link the 2 and then demolish the strawman is intellectual cowardice of the highest order.

This bloke really is a one trick pony. I would love to see a theist actually address just one of the arguments that Dawkins, Hitchens or Grayling actually makes. But i guess thats wishful thinking. Theo and Bunting would make a lovely (if sexually repressed) couple.