Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)

Comments by aquilacane


1. Mark Steyn vs. the 'Sock Puppets'

Comment #185715 by aquilacane on May 28, 2008 at 10:55 am

White males need not apply

Internal e-mail reveals hiring ban at Public Works

Tom Blackwell , National Post
Published: Saturday, November 19, 2005

A major federal department (Ontario, Canada) has temporarily banned the hiring of able-bodied white men in an unusual move critics say could spark a backlash against the very disadvantaged groups it is meant to help.

Managers in the Public Works department must hire only visible minorities, women, aboriginals and the disabled, except with written permission from their superiors, David Marshall, the deputy minister, ordered in an e-mail circulated yesterday.
The policy, designed to address shortfalls in the department's employment-equity goals, will last at least until the end of next March and be reviewed then, the memo said.

"As executives and managers, our role includes ensuring that the public service is representative," Mr. Marshall said in the memo. "This involves providing direction and leadership by example, and demonstrating a firm commitment to an inclusive workplace(unless you're white, of course)."

Canadian Human Rights Act

Section 8) It is a discriminatory practice

(a) to use or circulate any form of application for employment, or

(b) in connection with employment or prospective employment, to publish any advertisement or to make any written or oral inquiry

that expresses or implies any limitation, specification or preference based on a prohibited ground of discrimination.

1976-77, c. 33, s. 8.

You can discriminate in Canada, but only against white people. Hell, the government does it quite regularly.

We even discriminated against seniors up until 2006, before mandatory retirement was abolished.

idiots

2. Car dealership advert tells atheists to 'shut up'

Comment #185558 by aquilacane on May 28, 2008 at 4:22 am

Having been a very involved copywriter on Ford's advertising campaign trail I can tell you that properly targeted letter writing to their corporate head office will bring hell down on this dealer. Ford doesn't like bad press, especially in the face of an ever strengthening Japanese car market in the US. A few letters, and they will say it's not our issue, the dealer is independent. Remind them in the letter that the dealer is using the Ford's name in vain and you will see action. I've already written my letter; although, ever since quitting their brand over the F-150 ball-joint issue, I've written a few letters to these guys.

3. Louisiana's latest creationism bill moves to House floor

Comment #185553 by aquilacane on May 28, 2008 at 4:09 am

What will they teach? I haven't seen any science surrounding ID. If they want to teach it in science class I don't think strong opinion is testable in lab or essay form. There is also the problem of explaining the evolution of the intelligent designer, what are its origins, how did it evolve, who is it and where is the evidence? Even if our genes turn out to be the extension of a more intelligent being it still doesn't answer the origin, or demonstrate progression from designer to independent life from. I can only see an argument that is based around imaginary holes in evolution and not actual evidence to support ID. Silly subhumans.

4. Mail-boat record 'proves Darwin stole his original ideas from a Welsh scientist'

Comment #185143 by aquilacane on May 27, 2008 at 4:40 am

This serves to support my belief that it is the content that should be considered and not its author. Who is much less relevant than what.

5. Five Things Humans No Longer Need

Comment #184032 by aquilacane on May 23, 2008 at 1:03 pm

My wise-ass teeth came in at 17 and didn't cause a problem. They took them out anyway (cash grab) under a local. As for Darwin's Point, I've seen it on many friends and thought nothing of it.

I have noticed that for many people the brain is becoming a vestigial organ. Not much thinking going on with the majority of the human race, I think we'll discover we're better off being stupid in numbers than smart and alone.

6. Teenager faces prosecution for calling Scientology 'cult'

Comment #183885 by aquilacane on May 23, 2008 at 5:11 am

If this goes poorly for the young chap I say we protest the courthouse as a cult, must be to have their heads so far up their asses.

7. 'Reverse Evolution' Discovered in Seattle Fish

Comment #183878 by aquilacane on May 23, 2008 at 4:51 am

So a genetic advantage (whether old or new) managed to protect its bearer from death before it procreated, thus passing on the genetic advantage; incredible!

8. Turkish Islamic author given 3-year jail sentence

Comment #180737 by aquilacane on May 15, 2008 at 4:35 pm

So Turkey has taken a larger step against one of its crackpots than the US has against any of its own. I guess you would have to start with Bush, and he's kind of running the country at the mo'. North America is so doomed.

9. Faith in Britain today

Comment #177762 by aquilacane on May 9, 2008 at 4:11 pm

Ooh... you bugger, almost got my fiver!

Bit long, but I think I'll use his style on my next fund raising letter. Stroke the chords then open the back door. Classic advertising technique. Could have chopped the last ten paras though; he didn't need them. Get your ass back to church, we need the cash. Might lose a few short focused buyers on the scan; not many callouts to catch the eye.

Put the logo in the corner, no bigger. I said bigger. Look I'm the client, I want that damn cross to jump off the page. I want a star burst with a 50% limited time offer deal. No, bigger. An I want a P.S., it needs to support the whole "Get back to church" campaign message. No, BIGGER!

I hate clients

10. The History Channel might do something right

Comment #176369 by aquilacane on May 7, 2008 at 8:01 am

I guess this is good, but it will probably still do more to make people ignorant of how evolution works with language like this:

Eyes are one of evolution's most useful and prevalent inventions (evolution does not invent)

Dinosaurs adapted their eyes to become such successful hunters of prey (Dinosaurs did not adapt their eyesto hunt prey, they can hunt prey because their eyes adapted. Their eyes adapted them in other words)

Tiny early mammals developed night vision to populate the night as a survival technique (There is no such thing as a survival technique. Survival is a byproduct of evolution. In other words, tiny mammals could populate the night because night vision developed, thus surviving)

learn how primates underwent several adaptations to their eyes to better exploit their new habitat (Primate eye adaptation
didn't happen to better exploit their habitat, they could better exploit their habitat because eye adaptation occurred)

The ability to see colours helped them find food (got this right)

They evolved for a common reason - to give these animals a critical edge in interspecies warfare. (There is no reason to evolve only a cause of evolution. The byproduct of which is survival)

key innovations that have driven nature's evolutionary arms race from the dawn of life to today (innovation requires intelligence. I don't think supporting ID is the goal of this piece; however.)

To illustrate our and our fellow species' eternal struggle for survival on earth (We don't struggle to survive, survival is neither positive or negative in the eyes of genes; however, it is hard to study genes that cause death because they don't last, so we are left with the only alternative, which is to study genes that have resulted in the byproduct of survival. We have merely assumed that this means there is intent to survive, but that's impossible unless you follow the ID model)

11. The emerging moral psychology

Comment #175586 by aquilacane on May 5, 2008 at 4:30 pm

"Greene interprets these different activation patterns, and the relative difficulty of making a choice in the Footbridge Problem, as the sign of conflict within the brain. On the one hand is a negative emotional response elicited by the prospect of pushing a man to his death saying "Don't do it!"; on the other, cognitive elements saying "Save as many people as possible and push the man!" For most people thinking about the Footbridge Problem, emotion wins out; in a minority of others, the utilitarian conclusion of maximising the number of lives saved."

First of all, no one in this position would have time to think, so the test is faulty. I doubt any of the people who said they would push the man would have pushed the man. I doubt they would have considered the man as a suitable object for stopping a runaway cart, it is after all a man. Once the option of pushing the man is planted; however, only then do they consider it and take time to think about it, of course, the cart would have raced past by now and it wouldn't have mattered.

There is also the problem that we did not evolve with the ability to kill a person at the push of a button or flick of a switch, we had to use our hands. We don't associate button pushing as killing quite the same way we do throttling a person to death, I expect you could ask a fighter pilot, especially one who has killed with their hands.

As well, if I'm seen pushing the man I cannot say I didn't do it, if I flick a switch I can say I didn't realize what would happen. Each step between the cause and effect separates us from ownership. Self preservation surely plays a role, I can hear the excuses in my head. I figured the cart was going to fast and would crash from the abrupt change, I did everything I could, blah blah blah. You can't talk your way out of pushing someone off a bridge though.

12. Student's 'Be Happy, Not Gay' t-shirt ok

Comment #169481 by aquilacane on April 26, 2008 at 7:24 am

Szymanowski wrote:

BE HAPPY NOT CHRISTIAN

That isn't clever enough I'm afraid. Straight out attack if you ask me. You could; however, write:

BE HAPPY NOT DELUSIONAL

13. Student's 'Be Happy, Not Gay' t-shirt ok

Comment #169466 by aquilacane on April 26, 2008 at 6:45 am

That's actually not bad (for a Christian). It can be argued easily in a court of law, amazed it made it that far (what a waste of money). I prefer seeing some thought in their bigotry, rather than just pure hate.

14. Mount Vernon schools to hire investigator in Bible case

Comment #169447 by aquilacane on April 26, 2008 at 5:57 am

I was probably my most verbally abusive with the religious in grade eight. My father had died a few years earlier. That really strengthened my atheism making me extremely sensitive to any religious influence. I refused to sing Christmas carols in music class (the teacher did not know what to do). I would stand outside of the school during the lords prayer. Any time any teacher ever made a ref. to god, I would ask for proof, or tell them to shut up. If this teacher had branded me with a cross when I was in grade eight, I probably would have killed him were he stood. And I mean that. I would have made every effort to throttle him to death. Today I would only beat him to within an inch of his life. Oh how the wisdom of age tempers our hand in the fog of furry.

15. Responses to 'Gods and Earthlings' by Richard Dawkins

Comment #166037 by aquilacane on April 22, 2008 at 5:17 pm

"In the end, he, like everyone else, must confront one of two choices: Either the universe has always existed, or it was created by someone who has always existed."

I don't really agree with this statement, but if I were confronted with only two choices, I would probably chose eternal existence for the one that I actually know exists (universe). I don't see a need to create a second level of complexity based on nothing but opinion with an even less likely chance of it ever being explained.

Besides, if god's plan is so grand and beyond human contemplation, everyone (including theologians) should be hell bent on discovering what science can teach us about everything else we can know (that's only if god's will can not be known, of course).

16. Lizards Undergo Rapid Evolution After Introduction To A New Home

Comment #164869 by aquilacane on April 20, 2008 at 7:08 pm

Was the capacity to develop Cecal valves brought about by the introduction of a slowly growing nematode population in the hindguts, or something else? Just want to know the full nature of the relationship.

17. Open Letter to a victim of Ben Stein's lying propaganda

Comment #164847 by aquilacane on April 20, 2008 at 6:41 pm

I'm disturbed people may actually start to believe we are somehow responsible for the Holocaust. How the hell did this happen? This is all I bloody need. I'm really put off. I've felt the hate, but this is different; can't say I fancy being on the other end of that stick.

18. Sex for diploma offer caught on tape

Comment #164252 by aquilacane on April 19, 2008 at 9:02 pm

I didn't see any evidence that it was actually him saying those things or him sitting in that truck. I don't even know if those things were said in that truck. I don't know if mother actually spoke at all, or if the female voice was actually hers. I have no idea who mother is, and no face to check against. I see no evidence of a daughter. I reserve judgment for further information.

19. Evolution: 24 myths and misconceptions

Comment #163862 by aquilacane on April 19, 2008 at 7:49 am

The Count wrote:
"The subtitle echoes a bumper sticker I thought of (which could perhaps be made a bit more catchy):
"Don't believe in evolution? Maybe you just don't understand it."

How about spreading the notion "Understand then believe" If someone asks "believe what" reply "you'll know when you understand" Short bumper stickers are more effective. 5 words max, less is better. How about just "realize"

20. The Child Preachers

Comment #163858 by aquilacane on April 19, 2008 at 7:38 am

Santi wrote:
"would you also prevent parents from putting their little girls in beauty contests ala "Little Miss Sunshine?"

Why we wear the clothes, makeup, and other sexual attractants that we do is pretty much a basic social forms of sexual solicitation. It can only be said that a parent who dresses their 8 year old as a solicitor of sex is vile. When a women or man get dressed up and go out on the town they are displaying their sexual capability and readiness. There is only ever a problem when an unsuitable caller makes a call. Unfortunately he or she are merely responding to the advertisement as any interested person would. To put a child in the position of inviting interested parties is asinine. I puke each time I see it, and it's always the ugliest least promotable mothers doing the advertising.

21. The Child Preachers

Comment #163845 by aquilacane on April 19, 2008 at 6:59 am

I've actually stood next to a child preacher in Georgia and started preaching evidence is our savior, evidence will set you free (I didn't even go atheist on him) as a joke for about 10 seconds. I was hit with the bible by the child and had my life threatened by the father who was hanging out back. The kid was a robot, no life in the eyes, just a machine. No one else cared that any of us were there, except the 5 or 6 drunk rugby players I was with. They just laughed at me. I felt sad for the kid after I sobered up a bit.

22. Flea of the week

Comment #163697 by aquilacane on April 18, 2008 at 7:50 pm

Paula wrote:

"And how ironic it is that the ONE thing that really MIGHT make us special in the universe is the ONE thing that the religious want to guard against and subdue with every fibre in their bodies."

Funny you should say this Paula. I was thinking the other night how it was a bit drole how the ones among us who can't accept that we are just animals are the ones who behave the most like them.

23. Richard Dawkins' secular army must be stopped. God is behind some of our greatest art

Comment #160889 by aquilacane on April 14, 2008 at 2:18 pm

Religion could have no historical effect on the arts before the arts had an effect on religion. We would still have art without religion, but perhaps not religion without art. This idiot doesn't even have it the right way around. Religion is a message, art is a medium. And no, despite being a nice little sound bite like the Selfish Gene, Marshall McLuhan's the Medium is Message horse crap (using really bad, non literal words to explain what you literally mean) isn't what I'm talking about. Art does not need religion, religion needs art.

24. Science Debate 2008

Comment #160872 by aquilacane on April 14, 2008 at 1:56 pm

Hourglass Memory Wrote:
"I really really really do hope America gets to do this. And makes people watch it. It's a way to get tons of ignorant americans thinking about science at least once in their lives."

Unfortunately some of those ignorant people are the candidates themselves. They don't want a science debate because they don't know what to say.

You may as well have a debate on the benefits of Scaliptigonal Functionality inside the Rotoscopic Membrance and how those benefits can cause greater Rapinticlular Behaviour in the Oscilabnum Nodes of a Polansticious society. It's pure mumbo to these people. The most you can hope for is a prepped answer to a typical question.

25. Ancient serpent shows its leg

Comment #159440 by aquilacane on April 12, 2008 at 7:46 am

People, people; this is obviously a test of faith. What, with the current religious climate and the rampant arrogance of atheists, this can only be seen as a test from god. The timing is perfect; a true believer will see the designed significance.

IDiots

26. Did pre-big bang universe leave its mark on the sky?

Comment #158793 by aquilacane on April 11, 2008 at 3:41 am

What roles do the other universes beyond our own universe play? What if our universe collides with another universe, what would happen then, would they pass through each other like a galaxy. I'm disturbed that we only ever seem to consider our universe as the only universe, hence the uni. I can imagine several universe existing side by side in a soup of universes.

27. German Church admits aiding Nazis

Comment #158411 by aquilacane on April 10, 2008 at 12:59 pm

Fighting Falcon Wrote:
"Had the Church shown any opposition, they probably would have just been destroyed by the SS/SD like everyone else was. I'm not giving them a pass by any means but criticizing them for participating in a mandatory program of the Nazi government isn't very fair, either."

What a perfect opportunity for someone who truly believes in god to get into heaven. Otherwise they don't truly believe. They want power or they're justing hedging their bets.

28. Expelled producers accused of copyright infringement

Comment #158402 by aquilacane on April 10, 2008 at 12:49 pm

It's funny how these IDiots have to rely on the scientific knowledge of the science community they are attacking in order to get an understanding (rip-off) of what they are talking about. They don't know jack, there is no "science" for these IDiots to teach in science class. What the hell would a lab be like in one of these classes? Mix water mud and gum, and you have stainless steel. Um teacher, I don't have steel. Yes you do. No. Yes. No. Ok, no more labs, just trust me.

IDiots!

29. Commentary: Democrats finally getting religion on religion

Comment #157927 by aquilacane on April 9, 2008 at 6:53 pm

"...will allow each candidate to speak for 40 minutes on various moral issues, including poverty, global AIDS, climate change and human rights."


If morality is a gift by god, what is there to talk about? Be moral, or admit there is no god. There is nothing to talk about. It is not the ability to talk about moral issues that is claimed to be given, but morals themselves, so get on with it.

30. Hitchens vs. Hitchens

Comment #157209 by aquilacane on April 8, 2008 at 5:13 pm

Is Peter a middle child? Sibling rivalry sounds interesting. Are the parents highly religious? I wonder if a favoured second child could be more prone to defend the family (faith)? Perhaps he has a mind of his own (Although shared by default with millions of other worshipers of ID)?

I guess a religious person will always search the ends of rainbows for pots of gold, believing one day they'll finally find one. And agnostics casually take a look just incase it's true. Of course Atheists study the rainbow, figure out how to reproduce and improve upon it, then cast rainbows in conveniently hilarious locations, just for a good laugh.

Guess I'll watch then

31. Faith healing church parents charged over toddler's death

Comment #155868 by aquilacane on April 6, 2008 at 7:16 am

Some idiot said:

"I see no reason to believe without evidence that there is something innately different between a 4 month old foetus, a 1 day old child and an adult pig. If someone can provide me with good scientific evidence that there is a line that can be drawn based on levels of cognition or intelligence then I would be interest to hear of it"

I actually remember being born, and I can tell you there is a big difference 1 day after birth. I can remember exact sentences and words from before I was 6 months old. I can totally recall a vacation to Quebec at three months and can still see the lobster we ate, and I remember crying because I didn't get any. That's a huge difference in levels of cognition and intelligence with a pig. Never mind the fact that as a human baby the potential for far greater cognition and intelligence is present. Who ever thinks it's ok to snuff a kid because they are not aware enough or smart enough is a timing thing. It's like saying kill everyone as they just wake-up because they're not very aware or smart at that hour of the morning.

Dumb asses.

32. Pastor attacks scientist's talk

Comment #155567 by aquilacane on April 4, 2008 at 10:15 pm

I doubt if this were a talk given by a religious leader there would be any calls for balance. What a load. I have given up.

33. BBC 'too scared to allow jokes about Islam'

Comment #154565 by aquilacane on April 3, 2008 at 12:59 pm

Shuggy wrote:
I can't wait to see "The Mullah of Dibley" or "Imam Ted".

Come to think of it, is "The Vicar of Dibley" or "Father Ted" shown in the US?

In Canada, we have a show called Little Mosque on the Prairie, but it is Canadian so it sucks. You can tell in the first frame of a Canadian program that it is Canadian and whether or not it will suck. I don't know how they do it, must be a Canadian directors trick. If you want everyone to know it's Canadian, open on a green field and dress everyone in 1880 period costume. Make sure there are never more than three people in any shot. Horse crap film industry in this country.

Sorry, back to the Mosque crap, the show sucks, and it does more to appease our angry Muslim psychos than actually call attention to any real meaningful debate. Make them feel welcome. I find I am against multiculturalism more and more these days. Really creates an environment of hate, suspicion, and isolation. I have met 80-year-old Greek men and women who’ve lived in Montreal since their teens and still couldn't speak English or French... what the hell?

I barely classify myself as Canadian anymore, no point. I was born here that’s it. I don’t work for this country, I don’t care for this country, I won’t fight for this country, I would leave if there were someplace to go. Healthcare is going by the side of the road, and the only things I can see being promoted as unifying symbols of Canada are a stupid leaf, Tim Horton’s coffee, and a game played on ice by overpaid, overgrown children. And to make it all worse, I have to kiss the asses of these hate mongering fucktards because their stupid book threatens to kill me if I don’t. Screw that!

35. Faith healing church parents charged over toddler's death

Comment #153816 by aquilacane on April 2, 2008 at 5:56 am

SweatyPalmSunday, if when you look at a young child, a baby, and you are not driven to protect it at all cost, by instinct, save perhaps the cost of your own life, I fear you have suppressed something very important. If you choose instead to kill that child for the inconvenience that you yourself caused, I would surely be at the hilt of the blade about your throat.

I cannot conceive of a reason why you should willingly kill an otherwise healthy child in a time of general peace and prosperity, and with so much available outside support. An accidental suffocation in a time of high anxiety, perhaps while being chased by dogs and the Lynch-man, ok, you just want to keep the little bastard quiet to save your ass. Mistakes happen. But I can guarantee you that the failures of others (the Greeks in this case) are a poor excuse for your own failures. Smarten-up, you can be rational and emotional or just rational and in denial of your emotions.

36. Iowa county board gives initial OK for ghost hunters to investigate asylum

Comment #151343 by aquilacane on March 28, 2008 at 2:28 pm

I think the first line was meant to read:

IOWA CITY, Iowa - County officials have given their informal OK for ghost hunters to be checked in to a one-time Iowa insane asylum for believing that spirits are lurking about.

37. Police: Girl Dies After Parents Pray for Healing Instead of Seeking Medical Help

Comment #150861 by aquilacane on March 27, 2008 at 1:29 pm

Spinoza wrote:
Lucas, I understand the sentiment, but ignorance, delusion, and stupidity are not fairly punishable by death.

When dogs are rabid you put them down, not for their faults, but to safeguard the healthy.

38. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #149116 by aquilacane on March 25, 2008 at 6:14 am

I think I was nine when I concluded that even though one may argue that life did not evolve on earth, it doesn't remove the fact that life must still have evolved somewhere. By applying a degree of separation you still don't remove the problem. I thought this was obvious. IDers must think chocolate bars appear in corner stores ready to go, out of nothing.

Imagine this from your kid:

Yes mom, I know my bedroom is full of old dinner plates covered in rotting food but I swear it wasn't me, that food hasn't been rotting for as long as it looks, it just suddenly appeared like that from some other distant bedroom (where it also wasn't rotting pesumably, yet is still somehow rotten).

I hope my example makes no sense as the problem is senseless.

39. Religion 'linked to happy life'

Comment #147589 by aquilacane on March 20, 2008 at 11:58 pm

Comment #145976
Shemp333 said

"Ignorance is Bliss!!!"

You said it Shemp

No more need be said

40. Oklahoma: One Step from Doom

Comment #141113 by aquilacane on March 10, 2008 at 3:47 am

A few big problems here:

How would a teacher know if the student was right, unless the teacher was educated in that child's specific religion?

Will all teachers be required to know all religions?

By what method will a teacher explain to the children how the same question can have two or more correct answers?

What will the state do with intelligent children who see this as false and refuse to comply?

How ridiculous an answer is permissible as long as it has religious affiliation?

Will any evidence be required to support the religious opinion?

Can a child refuse to answer any and all questions due to religious dogma and still recieve a passign grade.

Must the child answer in their parents religion, or are they permitted to chose their own religion with which to answer the question?

For a better chance at getting the question right, can a child reference multiple religions providing more than one answer to each question?

Is a child permitted to change their religious views to suit the question?

Must the child's opinion be of an organized religion or is the child free to use any religious opinion including their own invented religion?

Since religious opinion can not be questioned, will all answers be deemed correct so long as they are of a religious nature?

If the childs answer is not in keeping with their parent's (or their) religion will it be deemed incorrect or can the child claim their religion to be an offshoot (variant) of the parent religion?

What do teachers teach if the answers are up to the children to provide. Will class be nothing more that questions you take home and fill in based on the bible?

There are more...

This is stupid...

I feel sick... puked in my mouth a bit.

I thought the last nail was in the coffin of the good ol' US of A a while ago, but this really puts the box in the ground for me.

41. In Defence of Selfish Genes

Comment #139967 by aquilacane on March 6, 2008 at 8:49 pm

Richard,
I know little about selfish gene theory; however, as a professional in the Advertising business, I know you should never misspell the title of your book.

Each time is a marketing opportunity.

Sam

42. Hebrew University researcher: Moses was tripping at Mount Sinai

Comment #138587 by aquilacane on March 4, 2008 at 3:05 pm

Trippin' on plant dope was a popular hypothesis in my house, even from a very early age. I remember my mother calling Jesus et al nothing more than a bunch of shroom heads trippin' around the dessert. This was over 30 years ago.

43. Survey shows Non-Religious Outnumber Those of Every Single Faith (But One)

Comment #138038 by aquilacane on March 3, 2008 at 7:36 pm

SeaLife wrote:

"We may have to consider that ending childhood indoctrination is not enough to create a rational society"

This is not true. It is the religious conditioning during childhood indoctrination that is the problem. Which religion isn't important, it's the thought process. Once you can accept both the natural and the supernatural in one reality, you are pretty much anyone's sucker. I'm surprised it isn't more than 44% who switch.

44. Physicist Neil Turok: Big Bang Wasn't the Beginning

Comment #133986 by aquilacane on February 27, 2008 at 5:49 am

If you consider that time doesn't exist, this model works even better. Why try to explain the begining of something that isn't even there? Of course, when we finally have the technology to discover our nearest neighbour universe, and realise that we share matter on an even larger scale than merely whithin our own little universe, this idea will need some fine-tunning. Millions of mirrors in a bigger room with more corners, and more than just air floating around.

45. Moral thinking

Comment #133000 by aquilacane on February 25, 2008 at 1:56 pm

There are no such things as morals, purely a human justification for natural behaviour. Next, you'll be trying to tell me time is real.

46. Dumb and Dumber: Are Americans Hostile to Knowledge?

Comment #127407 by aquilacane on February 15, 2008 at 8:49 am

It won't be long before I can bus cheap American labour over the border into my Canadian factories. Pay them crap and make them sleep in freezing cold rooms with no water or facilities.

And they will like it, or starve!

47. Admitting that you have no religion is not politically correct

Comment #122368 by aquilacane on February 5, 2008 at 8:07 am

Send letters to:

Ms. Nashifa Carter
Harassment and Discrimination Co-ordinator
email: nccarter@wlu.ca

48. Admitting that you have no religion is not politically correct

Comment #122366 by aquilacane on February 5, 2008 at 8:03 am

I've just sent my letter of concern to:

Ms. Nashifa Carter
Instructor SBE(MOB)

50. Mitt Romney Defends Himself Against Allegations Of Tolerance

Comment #114256 by aquilacane on January 21, 2008 at 4:29 pm

What really makes me puke is the fact that this may as well be real. Honestly, I can't see the joke... this is what it's like for real.

More Pages: 1 2 | Next