1. The smallest signs of retreat

Comment #68467 by dubyamd on September 7, 2007 at 8:13 am

i always look forward to reading this criticisms of Dawkins, waiting for one that raises good, clear arguments... and I'm always disappointed. I feel like they totally are missing key points (and in some cases FACTS), so any 'arguments' they come up with are just pointless from the get-go.

Or they just don't know what they're talking about. Good example:
"No, said Dawkins, I never said religion was a disease, only "a virus". It was a shame we didn't have time to establish the fine distinction Dawkins was trying to make."

Really? You need him to establish the distinction between a virus and a disease? Really?