1. Richard Dawkins replies to Libby Purves
Comment #227520 by Random_Interrupt on August 10, 2008 at 6:02 am
I hesitate to use the vulgarism "pwned" but really, it's quite appropriate, that last line drew BLOOD.
2. Richard Dawkins' secular army must be stopped. God is behind some of our greatest art
Comment #160379 by Random_Interrupt on April 14, 2008 at 2:18 am
Limp-wristed myopia at its very finest, especially as it comes so close in the wake of two events; first, the death by type-2 diabetes of a young girl who's pareants allowed her to sicken and die while they vainly sought miraculous intervention, and for whom I would willingly and gladly whitewash the Sistine chapel and set the louvre to the torch if it meant saving her life, and the death of Arthur C. Clarke, a secular literary luminary who along side the foresight of Asimov and the eloquence of Sagan shall be remembered long after this hack has gone the way of Ozymandias.
It is a simple truth I think that while certain renaissance poets may have had an air of heartbreaking realism added to their work by the fact that they were being slowly eaten away from the inside by tuberculosis this does not chnge the fact that they still had a DISEASE.
4. Hitchens and Boteach Debate on God
Comment #125159 by Random_Interrupt on February 11, 2008 at 3:16 am
The term "Evisceration" comes to mind.
5. Interview with Richard Dawkins
Comment #116746 by Random_Interrupt on January 27, 2008 at 10:26 am
Wow, the dawkmeister laid down some oldschool breakdance-style ownage on that caller!
Comment #96348 by Random_Interrupt on December 10, 2007 at 12:30 pm
I must say that if christians made an image equating me with Jesus as a way of discrediting me I should think I would hardly be able to contain my mirth at the implications...
7. Bad Faith Awards: Vote for the winner now
Comment #94549 by Random_Interrupt on December 6, 2007 at 1:23 am
When one considers the horrific deathtoll from AIDS in africa, i'm gonna have to go with Archbishop Francisco Chimoio. Dinesh was tempting but he's merely irritating, Chimoio is genocidally dangerous.
8. Daniel Dennett Debates Dinesh D'Souza
Comment #93148 by Random_Interrupt on December 2, 2007 at 10:20 am
Well I think that was a comprehensive self-owning on the part of D'Souza, Dennet's stumbling was a bit of a let down but I think he may have just been overwhelmed by the sheer quantity of bunk being thrown at him in D'souza's typical scattershot fashion. It is a common frustration when dealing with theist "arguments" that a statement that takes only a few seconds to make can often take several minutes to properly refute.