










1. Kansas science standards evolve again, becoming pro-Darwin
Comment #22312 by abilard on February 14, 2007 at 4:33 am
Does this mean they won't be teaching about the Flying Spaghetti Monster? :-(
Home | Reason | Science | Columns | Newsletter | Calendar | The Richard Dawkins Foundation | Store | Archives | Contact | Forum | Website Banners | Tour Journal | Converts' Corner | Good, Bad, Ugly | Update Log
RichardDawkins.net : The Official Richard Dawkins Website
Email: contact@richarddawkins.net · Website Design by Josh Timonen / Upper Branch
Upper Branch Los Angeles Office: 1427 N La Brea, Suite A
LA, CA 90028 USA
Mailing List Signup: Enter your email
Go to The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science
Richard Dawkins Articles | Comments | Tour Journal
Atheist Resources | Local Groups
Debate Points | Latest Responses
"I want science to be taken seriously, because, after all, it's less ephemeral--it has a more eternal aspect than whatever the politics of the day might be, which, of course, gets the lead in the news."
Richard Dawkins
"Scientific truth is too beautiful to be sacrificed for the sake of light entertainment or money. Astrology is an aesthetic affront. It cheapens astronomy, like using Beethoven for commercial jingles."
Richard Dawkins
"Group selection of any kind is not Darwinism as Darwin understood it nor as I understand it."
Richard Dawkins
"I doubt that religion can survive deep understanding. The shallows are its natural habitat. Cranks and fundamentalists are too often victimised as scapegoats for religion in general. It is only quite recently that Christianity reinvented itself in non-fundamentalist guise, and Islam has yet to do so (see Ibn Warraq's excellent book, Why I am not a Muslim). Moonies and scientologists get a bad press, but they just haven't been around as long as the accepted religions. Theology is a respectable discipline when it studies such subjects as moral philosophy, the psychology of religious belief and, above all, biblical history and literature. Like Bertie Wooster, my knowledge of the Bible is above average. I seem to know Ecclesiastes and the Song of Solomon almost by heart. I think that the Bible as literature should be a compulsory part of the national curriculum - you can't understand English literature and culture without it. But insofar as theology studies the nature of the divine, it will earn the right to be taken seriously when it provides the slightest, smallest smidgen of a reason for believing in the existence of the divine. Meanwhile, we should devote as much time to studying serious theology as we devote to studying serious fairies and serious unicorns. "
Richard Dawkins
"It's been suggested that if the supernaturalists really had the powers they claim, they'd win the lottery every week. I prefer to point out that they could also win a Nobel Prize for discovering fundamental physical forces hitherto unknown to science."
Richard Dawkins
"If this book doesn't change the world -- we're all screwed."
-Penn (Penn & Teller)
Over 1.5 million copies sold