1. Schools should put faith in science

Comment #91917 by Dylan Dog on November 29, 2007 at 2:50 pm

Great article!

2. The God Debate

Comment #30031 by Dylan Dog on April 6, 2007 at 9:17 am

Truthseeker M106

As an atheist I can assure you that I have no fear of hell indeed lets just say very hypothetically speaking that you are correct and there is this "hell" place-then I am comforted that I will NOT have to spend eternity with a bunch of born-agains(in fact that would BE hell for me)

Regards

DD

3. Lil' Markie live, part 2

Comment #17659 by Dylan Dog on January 15, 2007 at 10:47 am

Usually I like weird, off the wall things but this was weird in a disturbing, doesn't feel right sort of way. I'm speechless...

Odd, very odd.

4. Intelligent Design packets

Comment #16903 by Dylan Dog on January 9, 2007 at 2:32 pm

Oh no! anaother wah wah who believes the world started 6000 years ago, in 6 days with a talking snake!

I am just waiting for the "half-evolved feathers/eyes/lungs etc etc" to make an apperance...

5. William Crawley, BBC Belfast, names Richard Dawkins as Person of the Year 2006

Comment #15600 by Dylan Dog on January 1, 2007 at 2:24 pm

that should be NOT satire!

6. William Crawley, BBC Belfast, names Richard Dawkins as Person of the Year 2006

Comment #15599 by Dylan Dog on January 1, 2007 at 2:23 pm

Hi Lionel A,

Unfortuantely I do believe this is satire. The site is from N. Ireland and we have the most fundamentalists in the Uk. What Billy wrote was actually quite mild in comparison to some things I have heard ie., from Ian Paisley.

7. Beliefwatch: Blasphemy (Challenge)

Comment #15591 by Dylan Dog on January 1, 2007 at 1:15 pm

|deny the holy spirit AND say that the miracles attributed to the Judeo-Christian god were actually done by a demon!

Thats a double whammy insurance against spending eternity with a bunch of fundamentalists.

8. William Crawley, BBC Belfast, names Richard Dawkins as Person of the Year 2006

Comment #15584 by Dylan Dog on January 1, 2007 at 12:39 pm

Congratualtions Richard!

On another matter- on William Crawleys blog there are quite a few articles about Andy McIntosh and the resultant replies from creationists, if anyone would like to join the debate-please come and join us!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ni/2006/12/person_of_the_year_2006_1.html

9. The God of the Bible is No Delusion!

Comment #15539 by Dylan Dog on January 1, 2007 at 6:50 am

"Ah yes, so you all believe that everything came from nothing....by accident! Now that's faith I admire."

Errr and you believe(I presume) that the world started 6000 odd years ago with a talking snake based on a primitive bronze age creation myth. Or perhaps you are and IDer or creationism lite.

Evolution of the cell...http://www.endo.mpg.de/pdfdat/Wissenschaft/lecture_eichele.pdf

Evolution of the eye...http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/01/1/l_011_01.html

Evolution of the brain...http://www.primatesociety.com/Into/survival/timeline/textEvol.html

Definition of scientific law/theory...http://wilstar.com/theories.htm

"I notice also there seems to be an awful lot of derogatory personal comment in this thread, which in my experience usually happens in a debate when someone has no sound evidence to present....!"

Errr no, it is because the world scientific community is being called liars by a bunch of bone-head wah wah fundmentalists who believe that the world is only 6000 years old and started with a talking snake! and cannot present one piece of credible, verifiable, peer reviewed evidence to back up their claims. The reason is that their ideas are not based on science, nor evidence but the literal interpreation of a primitive bronze age creation myth.

10. China's white dolphin called extinct after 20 million years

Comment #12924 by Dylan Dog on December 14, 2006 at 12:00 pm

how very, very sad

11. An Exercise in Contempt

Comment #12552 by Dylan Dog on December 12, 2006 at 2:44 pm

Started to get annoyed when I first started reading this but really showed me that Mr Kirk is an ignorant fraud was his willfull use of one of the more infamous creationist misquotes of Stephen Gould.

It is interesting that Mr Kirk does not give the full quote, which either shows that he copied it from a creationist website without checking it's authenticity(likely) or actually read the article and has been even more dishonest by omitting material that he read(less likely). In either instance Mr. Kirk has shown himself to pretty useless and utterly inept as any sort of journalist.