Comments by blake121666

Removed by poster so as not to cause undue offence.

8. What is science for?

Comment #184598 by blake121666 on May 25, 2008 at 8:21 pm

Removed by poster so as not to cause undue offence.

9. What is science for?

Comment #184578 by blake121666 on May 25, 2008 at 7:03 pm

Removed by poster so as not to cause undue offence.

10. What is science for?

Comment #184562 by blake121666 on May 25, 2008 at 5:57 pm

Removed by poster so as not to cause undue offence.

11. What is science for?

Comment #184552 by blake121666 on May 25, 2008 at 5:19 pm

Removed by poster so as not to cause undue offence.

12. What is science for?

Comment #184332 by blake121666 on May 24, 2008 at 4:22 pm

Removed by poster so as not to cause undue offence.

13. What is science for?

Comment #184310 by blake121666 on May 24, 2008 at 1:54 pm

Removed by poster so as not to cause undue offence.

14. What is science for?

Comment #184048 by blake121666 on May 23, 2008 at 1:38 pm

Removed by poster so as not to cause undue offence.

15. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #176559 by blake121666 on May 7, 2008 at 3:21 pm

Says ASMarques:

I admire Richard Dawkins's fight against religion, the kind of blind belief that is based on unexamined superstition instead of rational evidence, but it seems to me he should avoid dogmatically pronouncing himself on topics of an historical nature he seems to have carried little or no investigation into.

He does that twice, first concerning the supposed existence of Jesus the individual (an unsound vestige of religious belief that goes against all reasonable historical evidence that clearly points to Jesus the elaborate syncretic myth instead), and then about the so-called "Holocaust" (in fact the latest politically and religiously motivated aggiornamento of Judaism, riddled with contradictions and straight falsehoods that fly in the face of careful examination).

I entirely agree. I don't like how he idolizes Einstein either. Not being a physicist himself, he's pandering to the crowd. The blind leading the blind on that one.

16. Help Build The Reason Project Archive!

Comment #123705 by blake121666 on February 7, 2008 at 2:22 pm

The link at the bottom of the main article is incorrect (should be http://www.reasonproject.org/).