1. The Salamander's Tale

Comment #141078 by wipeout on March 10, 2008 at 2:22 am

Look jackass Roland

I donna wanna lose it again. But i guess I will. My problems are enough for me. I don't give a shit what kind of psycological problems you have in your airhead. Paranoid, obsessed with that wooter guy? But do not take out your shit-like problems on me. Do not get my name involve in anything. You need a shrink go get a shrink. You can start i think everyone as wooter. Anywhere I look I see wooter. Sick sick sick.

Philip,
Can I get back to you later. I am not in the mood now.

2. The Salamander's Tale

Comment #141045 by wipeout on March 9, 2008 at 8:10 pm

To Philip

Now I lost it. Look, Philip guy, I am crippled from birth. I can't walk or run or go to the movie theatre or any place I want to go unless I have some help.and I can't get married. I am reading this web page to look for some hope why these things HAPPENED TO ME. Now you are swearing because just you cannot have baby.
What about man?

WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU RANTING ABOUT? What about me? What am I gonna do, man? Write a book of swearing to God?

For a couple days I am thinking about what the wooter guy wrote. I guess he is right. We are the taker not the giver. God if he exists gave us everything in return for what? Nothing. We did not pay anything.

Second, if you don't believe in God, what the fuck are you swearing about? Then your sickness is a fault of evolution. Then your swearing goes to blindwatcmaker or Darwin or whomever behind this? Stupid air head? He cannot have a baby? So what? What about me what me? What about me?

Do one thing at least. Do not swear your own evolution or do like me. Think rethink if you can?

Rest of clowns, you will give a well done ha. You crippled minds.

3. The Salamander's Tale

Comment #138984 by wipeout on March 5, 2008 at 2:21 am

(How do you define a scientific answer?)

(Seeing as he's a he: what does an omnipotent immortal g need a penis for?)

(I guess if you count telling us that g has sex with all living things)

Are these questions or arguments related to science?

Later you are blaming each other that some people can believe in wooter. To be honest, even those people who read your arguments (swearings) will feel tempted to take side of wooter or schmezers or others. You have no idea how intimidating you and your answers are. And I agree with wooter that you cannot explain Evolution theory by logic and answer his analogies the same way he does, using logic, you are only able to counter attack to cover your big holes in your E.T. by swearing or using inappropriate arguments. This will lead you to the place where you have nothing but swearing or exchanging ugly jokes.

4. The Salamander's Tale

Comment #138954 by wipeout on March 5, 2008 at 1:38 am

To this web dudes
I ain't no willing to intervine any stupid argument on this web page, but i am really tempted when i see twisted minds or mindsets obsessed with sex and related swearing- they think this is an ace card to use against anybody who are against them, like me or schemezers or kringski or wooter guy. If these are scientific answers, then, I know nothing about science. This is just ugly and ugly and ugly and ugly enough to shup their mouth up if they can't answer or argue in a polite way.

To reverend,
stop saying about me or insulting me, man. If you need a shrink i can advise you? IF i were wooter then, you are Dawkins. How does that sound? You suspiciuos dummy head.

5. Feb 12th: Happy Darwin Day!

Comment #132687 by wipeout on February 25, 2008 at 6:07 am

Look reverend guy,
I came back because it is not fair to attack all the people who do not think as the same way you think. This is not fair. And Don't start with me. Dummy head who thinks he writes someting nice, which is a garbage of his little thinking. You are all afraid of wooter guy because he wipes you out in your delusional world. You are shaking, dying, whining, trembling, frustrating. getting desperate and you end up; let's troll him. let's troll him, I don't answer, i don't answer, I am not talking to him, i am not talking to him, josh ban him please, because you can't beat him. That is not fair.

6. Feb 12th: Happy Darwin Day!

Comment #132483 by wipeout on February 24, 2008 at 8:21 pm

To Frankus
I am not an atheist not a theits. I am just reading and observing this read for a while. What i noticed that once the atheists stop insultin, they would initiate something to be civilized. The problem with that wooter is that he is seeking logic in Evolution theory and still could not find it in your answers. You do not answer him in the same way he asks; he is referring the logic in his questions and answer should be based on logic too. Otherwise, you cannot answer his logic loaded questions. The problem starts right here. Once you are unable to answer, you start insulting to overcome your runover ego. I do not think wooter is stupid, to me, he is very smart and this is not helping evolution theory to be correct rather, displaying the attitudes of this web page. Example, he asked a very simple question in his latest comment, how unconcsious chances can create conscious creations like human beings who can feel guilty, sad, wrong, frustrated, happy or unhappy or the most important thing is 'THINK'as wooter keeps mentioning.

7. Why Darwin matters

Comment #126658 by wipeout on February 13, 2008 at 7:49 pm

To: Styrer (OR SATIRE I would say) and then you would not understand why I called you satire, right, ignorant dumb head.)

You duck (or I would say dickhead) head with no understanding of sarcasm;

Crucify as turning evols(c)ify â€" the letter c is pronounced as “sâ€� for the sake of sarcasm and fun. You stupid, you fuck off and change your country. You do not belong in England where the greatest satirists were born.

To the rest of you;

I am out of here because I am sick and tired of your accusations and swearings. You consider anybody that is against you is wooter. Maybe Krisking is another wooter? You delusional paranoid funnies. YOU ARE AS PATHETIC AS A ROTTEN EGG. LEAVE ME ALONE. I do not care you your web page and your wooter guy. I just wanted to learn what the truth was. Now I know atheism is just starting with the F word. You never give a chance to others. You vultures.

8. Why Darwin matters

Comment #126307 by wipeout on February 13, 2008 at 12:44 am

I have read all the comments on this thread, i do not agree with banana that atheists are very polite and nice - check Irate guys' comments or reverend or others' - I am not either as the one who has no faith. But you know what? if i keep reading this web page i will believe that there is a creator because the way you discuss is so intimidating. The way you attack on theists like - no offense - like vultures. Krisking is a good example. As for wooter guy, if you get him, as if you will evolsify him immediately. To me trolling, swearing, insulting will not do any good to undermine him. He got popular already in other web pages as the best debater who silence entire dawkins web page, and with the way you deal, you cannot beat him?

9. Are Darwin's Theories Fact or Faith Issues?

Comment #124234 by wipeout on February 8, 2008 at 10:13 pm

to; Teratornis

You seem to be well-educated guy. I just came across in wooter's arguments - an open question and that question is boggling my mind? Does really soul exist? He compares computer and its power to man and soul? What do you think?

10. Are Darwin's Theories Fact or Faith Issues?

Comment #123330 by wipeout on February 7, 2008 at 1:44 am

To Ms Zara or Mr Zara, whatever

Look. pal. I aint no willing to discuss with you about your sexsual orgin or fantasies. I am a man. I am gay too in terms of being happy but homesexduals just stole that word - i am here to believe what you believe if it is a fact and at the same time comparing it with wooter's arguments all of which i copied and i am working on it. Don't push me otherwise i will write an e-mail to wooter to complain about you. You know what happens he comes; Yeah i know you can censorship him.

11. Are Darwin's Theories Fact or Faith Issues?

Comment #122695 by wipeout on February 5, 2008 at 8:34 pm

The web page is pamelas' coffee. You can check yourself. You are like that just vulture culture approach. Oh man! You are really out of line. I cannot handle with you. But i guess wooter did it very well. You are so much obsessed with this wooter guy that anybody sounds logical is wooter for you. I just asked a god damn question why the hell you are hiding wooter's comments. You are all sick man. I do not care you are gay or animal. I just asked a question, man. Why are you taking so personal? I told you i have no religion. But you are acting like I am a believer or something. But If become a believer, you will be the reason. Leave me alone.

12. Are Darwin's Theories Fact or Faith Issues?

Comment #122664 by wipeout on February 5, 2008 at 6:57 pm

D'ya think it is fair like covering or hiding his answers from readers? How many of us would we go over there and check knowing that his answers are there. It is like a movie and you delete one actor's lines and let the other speaks. Anyway thank you very much. I will read his comments and maybe I will write to his e-mail directly about what he says?

I am sorry, just my curiosity. The picture on the thread is your husband's picture right? It's kinda strange while there is a picture of a man and reading your comment saying 'my husbad loves the coffee.'

13. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #122660 by wipeout on February 5, 2008 at 6:43 pm

That is okay. I just want to look at the commnets on Group delusion. I could not find any. Because this wooter guy in Pamale' coffee web page mentioned about it. I just wonder how convincing his argument is.

14. Are Darwin's Theories Fact or Faith Issues?

Comment #122657 by wipeout on February 5, 2008 at 6:33 pm

That's all right. I just want to see his comments on Group Delusion. Because this guy in Pamela's coffee web page mentioned about it.

15. Are Darwin's Theories Fact or Faith Issues?

Comment #122656 by wipeout on February 5, 2008 at 6:31 pm

117. Comment #122207 by wipeout on February 4, 2008 at 11:21 pm

Wow! You seem to be having really hard time with this guy, wooter, ha! No worries, I ain’t no wooter. But honestly don’t you think that this guys had done very well even he is not a native speaker. I read all his comments last night searching all threads. I have no religion and I am not atheist either, nor native speaker, nor creationist. I am just a normal guy questioning myself and decide what to believe. One thing is sure that you got some serious issues against this guy. You are really ticked off when I mentioned the name wooter? Why? He can write and you answer. And I could not find his comments on Group delusion. One of my friends just passed his comment to me from another web-page. I think this guy is really a good debater:


Actually atheism can help for censorship as well. I started a debate on Dawking's web page and my discussion was based on questioning how logical evolution theory(E.T) is but they were all pissed off when I stand against their E.T with logic and reason. They swear, slander, so-called teasing, mocking, exchanging jokes, and I kept my stance saying that all the bad words belong to the owner of the mouth it pops out. Anybody go and check group delusion thread; all their answers(most of it is insulting) to me there, but my logical questions and analogies are all deleted. Do you think it is fair? Is this the approach that atheists guys take it; if you can't beat it, just delete it?

Wooter
Never give up!

Today's joke: One of the recent TV debates, one of the atheists' says, "it is a pity that Dawkins is all alone among those believers?"

It is a pity(!) that only 16% world population is atheists. Is that the reason? God help those who are struggling in a Dna Soup trying to find out millions kinds of creatures.

16. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #122207 by wipeout on February 4, 2008 at 11:21 pm

Wow! You seem to be having really hard time with this guy, wooter, ha! No worries, I ain’t no wooter. But honestly don’t you think that this guys had done very well even he is not a native speaker. I read all his comments last night searching all threads. I have no religion and I am not atheist either, nor native speaker, nor creationist. I am just a normal guy questioning myself and decide what to believe. One thing is sure that you got some serious issues against this guy. You are really ticked off when I mentioned the name wooter? Why? He can write and you answer. And I could not find his comments on Group delusion. One of my friends just passed his comment to me from another web-page. I think this guy is really a good debater:


Actually atheism can help for censorship as well. I started a debate on Dawking's web page and my discussion was based on questioning how logical evolution theory(E.T) is but they were all pissed off when I stand against their E.T with logic and reason. They swear, slander, so-called teasing, mocking, exchanging jokes, and I kept my stance saying that all the bad words belong to the owner of the mouth it pops out. Anybody go and check group delusion thread; all their answers(most of it is insulting) to me there, but my logical questions and analogies are all deleted. Do you think it is fair? Is this the approach that atheists guys take it; if you can't beat it, just delete it?

Wooter
Never give up!

Today's joke: One of the recent TV debates, one of the atheists' says, "it is a pity that Dawkins is all alone among those believers?"

It is a pity(!) that only 16% world population is atheists. Is that the reason? God help those who are struggling in a Dna Soup trying to find out millions kinds of creatures.

17. Are Darwin's Theories Fact or Faith Issues?

Comment #122206 by wipeout on February 4, 2008 at 11:19 pm

Wow! You seem to be having really hard time with this guy, wooter, ha! No worries, I ain’t no wooter. But honestly don’t you think that this guys had done very well even he is not a native speaker. I read all his comments last night searching all threads. I have no religion and I am not atheist either, nor native speaker, nor creationist. I am just a normal guy questioning myself and decide what to believe. One thing is sure that you got some serious issues against this guy. You are really ticked off when I mentioned the name wooter? Why? He can write and you answer. And I could not find his comments on Group delusion. One of my friends just passed his comment to me from another web-page. I think this guy is really a good debater:


Actually atheism can help for censorship as well. I started a debate on Dawking's web page and my discussion was based on questioning how logical evolution theory(E.T) is but they were all pissed off when I stand against their E.T with logic and reason. They swear, slander, so-called teasing, mocking, exchanging jokes, and I kept my stance saying that all the bad words belong to the owner of the mouth it pops out. Anybody go and check group delusion thread; all their answers(most of it is insulting) to me there, but my logical questions and analogies are all deleted. Do you think it is fair? Is this the approach that atheists guys take it; if you can't beat it, just delete it?

Wooter
Never give up!

Today's joke: One of the recent TV debates, one of the atheists' says, "it is a pity that Dawkins is all alone among those believers?"

It is a pity(!) that only 16% world population is atheists. Is that the reason? God help those who are struggling in a Dna Soup trying to find out millions kinds of creatures.

18. Are Darwin's Theories Fact or Faith Issues?

Comment #121688 by wipeout on February 4, 2008 at 2:03 am

Hello there!

I just want to know that once if there was a guy named wooter and his all comments were deleted because he is the best debater and his argument was based on logic vs evolution? I just heard from the grapewine of web pages that wooter shared his deleted arguments with other web pages and said, these are the arguments that were deleted from this web page and furtheremore he was undermined by any means of one can figure out. Is that true? Is there any censorship against the arguments with that hammer approach - I beat or you are deleted? What was the name of the thread wooter discussed his argument? I wanna just take a look at it?

19. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #121686 by wipeout on February 4, 2008 at 2:02 am

Hello there!

I just want to know that once if there was a guy named wooter and his all comments were deleted because he is the best debater and his argument was based on logic vs evolution? I just heard from the grapewine of web pages that wooter shared his deleted arguments with other web pages and said, these are the arguments that were deleted from this web page and furtheremore he was undermined by any means of one can figure out. Is that true? Is there any censorship against the arguments with that hammer approach - I beat or you are deleted? What was the name of the thread wooter discussed his argument? I wanna just take a look at it?