1. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158780 by D.I. Ogenes on April 11, 2008 at 3:21 am

The debate does not rest upon the Existence of God.

Rather, the debate rests upon the Existence of Idiocy alone. Richard Dawkins by his acts and his words reveals himself to be an idiot -- "Mathis tricked me and Myers".

For if a man is gullible once, he can be gullible twice. And if he is gullible twice, he can be thrice or ten or one hundred or more.

Soon his many accepted false beliefs reinforce each other forming a nexus of self-deceit.

In short, no one can believe a word from Richard Dawkins, the self-professed gullible idiot.

2. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158759 by D.I. Ogenes on April 11, 2008 at 2:43 am

You dummies ought to log off from the Internet and start reading books from long ago.

For if you did, you would recognize how far fallen are the contemporary High Priests of the Church of Academia from the laws laid down by Francis Bacon as to the Scientific Method.

Darwin's Conjecture of Descent with Modification amounts to junk science.

The evolution-based yarns spun by the High Priests of the Church of Academia lack in the face of ex post facto imposition of the Evolutionary Dogma upon the Fossil Record.

A High Priest from Academia has yet to prove Speciation either through observed evidence or through laboratory experimentation.

A High Priest from Academia has yet to predict a new species from observation of extant data and the application of Darwin's Conjecture upon such data.

From the complete Fossil Record, a High Priest of Academia has yet to show from start-to-end all intermediate steps taken that gave rise to a now existing species.

The hard truth shows that Evolutionary Doctrine amounts to a metaphysical doctrine in support of a Secular Religion.

The conjured Darwinian Evolution Story gives a Positivist Foundation for Political Control of folks and environments.

Every High Priest of the Church of Academia who has masqueraded Darwin's Conjecture as a legitimate theory ought to be run from town wearing a scarlet letter for the millions of deaths that hinged upon their Positivist excuse making.

3. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158722 by D.I. Ogenes on April 11, 2008 at 1:30 am

The many lame ad hominem attacks uttered from the simple minds of those indoctrinated into the Cult of Dawkins amuse.

Apples far near the tree. I would love to meet your moms and dads to see what pieces of work they must be.

4. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158709 by D.I. Ogenes on April 11, 2008 at 1:19 am

While dummies fall for the rhetoric "Science vs Religion" and "evolution vs creationism", the true Frame of Debate is The High Priests of the Church of Academia vs All Others as the source of jurisprudence justifcation. The Darwin vs God story -- Darwin's random chance as creator vs God as creator -- is but a sideshow, a distraction.

For if the High Priests of Academia are right, then through Humanism men can become gods. Their rhetoric justifies Pragmatism, Socialism, and Bureaucracy controlled by PhDs as Progressivism under Officialdom. In short, the Statistist dogma becomes Scientism and the Collectivist governance becomes a Technocracy.

Yet, if others are right, then governance and policy should arise only through debate. Not only does this place Academia in jeopardy, but also, this threatens any other form of Collectivist Governance, such as plutocracy.

If others are right, then individuals can reassert those ideals of the Individual Liberty Movement from Scottish Enlightenment and smart Frenchmen like Quesnay. Once again, Natural Rights in Freedom could have a legitimate stage over the Dole Privileges to Favoreds under Officialdom.

This poses a serious threat to any form of Collectivist Governance, which all of the West has lived under since the dawn of the 20th Century.

If Academia PhD Priests lose the debate then they cannot justify their Progressivism control over taxpayers' cash and cannot justify the high subsidy of their income.

You must ask yourself if you want a nerdy, hunched-shoulder, effminiate, squishy PhD male to decide the rules that control your life only because he can SHOUT LOUDER and claim "There is no god. Through science we'll become gods!"

5. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158645 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 9:14 pm

Richard Dawkins is every bit the Televangelist.

Rather than steal the Jesus story and slug it out in a crowded marketplace as the typical Televangelist does, Dawkins chose the Marketplace for Atheist Goods.

Although fewer customers troll the marketplace, fewer competitors exist to shuffle their wares.

This smart move lets huckster Richard Dawkins push himself as the Wal-Mart of Atheism, with many books and DVDs he offers for sale.

How Richard amuses and oh how his cult followers amuse.

6. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158632 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 8:55 pm

You dummies seem to have lost focus. Your bad attempts at nitpicking fail. What counts are the words that started it all.

Now for your reminder about your god Richard and his Sect of Atheism of the Church of Academia.

--
Whiny, effeminate Rickard Dawkins writes, "...Mathis tricked a number of scientists, including PZ Myers and me, into taking prominent parts in the film".

You must be one dumb guy to get tricked so easily.

Since we now know Richard Dawkins is dumb as proven by his act and self-incrimination, how can anyone accept any of his opinions as he pontificates from the Church of Academia and his Sect of Atheism?

No wonder Richard Dawkins has been tricked so easily into the Religion of Atheism. He's a gullible fool. Even he admits this about himself.

Rickard Dawkins suffers from a deep psychosis that manifests in OCD obsession over God.

Most likely, Dawkins suffered from some trauma owing to his father.

All should call for their cash back from money paid to Richard Dawkins whether for books or tuition.

A man so easily tricked as Richard Dawkins says of himself will believe any story. Thus, his entire beliefs and what he expresses is false.

7. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158624 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 8:40 pm

Always, you can tell how deeply indoctrinated a dummy of Academia and Collectivist control by the words they use.

"Gender" gives a great signal to the state of mind of the dummy.

"Gender" exists only in language. Humans have a sex.

8. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158622 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 8:36 pm

When faced with an Onslaught of Truth, the indoctrinate becomes angered and then enraged.

This anger manifests itself first in weak name calling, done so to test the opponent. Next comes tantrums of denial.

When the Onslaught of Truth begins to force Cognitive Dissonance, the enraged state of being soon follows.

As atheists, I hope you engage in much orgying, drugging, theft, rape and other free acts since in your minds there's no God and no afterlife.

You can find no bigger loser of Loserdom than the loser who is a Wallflower Atheist.

You folks are too easy.

9. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158614 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 8:26 pm

Most often, you find self-loathing homosexuals decrying God, which leads them to accept the Programming of Atheism.

What escapes these folks suffering from their deep psychosis is their nature. Only males and females exist.

Humans learn behavior through experience of action under circumstance.

10. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158606 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 8:13 pm

Nerdy dorks in their Realm of Loserdom reveal themselves with their expressed false beliefs that Web sites or chat rooms are real, that folks "troll".

These dummies confuse "troll" with "trawl".

A troll lives under a bridge never leaving.

Trawling is when you drag a net hoping to catch any fish.

So if you you want to delude yourself with false concepts like "community", recognize that you are the Trolls of RichardDawkins.net since you live your lives around the Cult of Richard on this web site.

Get yourselves a wordbook or two. Also, take up etymology.

Web board and chat nerds amuse. Atheists of Loserdom amuse the most.

11. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158595 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 7:50 pm

[1] Your deep psychosis made you susceptible to conditioning and programming by Institutions of Collectivism.

[2] Atheism is not doctrine of self-discovery. You came to accept it over time as you accepted various overt and covert stories as true.

[3] No man who is a member of a cult is free in his thinking. Thus, regardless of your bogus self-proclaimed label "Free Thinkers", you are not free nor are you thinkers. You are followers. Those who lead you conjured the label "Free Thinkers" for this purpose.

In short, you are indoctrinated and belong to a cult. You do so because it is the nature of man to join groups as a man intuits some advantage by belonging to the group.

However, others of groups will accept only those whom the consensus says will enhance the group.

Those who become atheists do so because they lack any offering worthy of healthy minded folks of other groups. The Clan of Atheists accept gladly, this fringe of nerdy dorks into their realm of Loserdom.

Since you are unsure of yourselves, you band together to get reassurance and reinforcement of your beliefs.

In the Church of Academia, you find the Sect of Atheism led by their Atheio-Pope Richard Dawkins. You belong to this sect.

12. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158581 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 7:23 pm

Intransigence gives a clear sign of indoctrination that leads to a deep psychosis.

Indoctrinates of the Church of Academia with its High Priests of Scientific Creationism -- Big Bang Ministers, Darwinian Preachers -- suffer from such psychosis.

Scientific Creationism sets the stage for the High Priests of Academia to spin their stories of Progressive Humanist Socialist Utopia.

Of course, these High Priests neglect to tell their indoctrinates that the many of the High Priests will become leaders of this New Technocracy.

Like all other folks who become indoctrinated into cults, Atheists suffer from Loser Syndrome. They come from the fringes of their peoples, outcasts.

Most often, these folks suffer from a defect -- a lisp, stuttering, homosexualism, being crippled, suffering from a crippling disease, having been abused by their dads, fat bodies and ugly faces, especially.

These mentally damaged folk turn to idols whom they see as powerful, enlightened, holding a truth that can explain why these indoctrinates suffered so at the hands of others.

The cult scheme is an old one. The Shrewd know it well and profit from the Idiocy who fall for it, generatiion after generation.

13. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158570 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 7:03 pm

INT. The Cave -- DARKNESS

The Cult of Dawkins

Bwwwaaaaa... D.I. Ogenes makes us think. More so, he chops down our shaky shack built upon stilts of false beliefs.

Cult Leader

Never worry. We have ways of making D.I. Ogenes disappear.

First Cult Member
(frothing at mouth)

Yes. We shall sing praises of our god Richard and double up on our hail Richards.

Second Cult Member
(turning to another)

You know, this Group Dynamics thing reveals the many truths about the Cult of Dawkins to which we belong. If that clever D.I. Ogenes keeps speaking, he might open all of our eyes. Who knew that we strive to maintain group cohesion by attacking the outsider?

Third Cult Member

Yes. Why D.I. Ogenes has shown that Richard Dawkins built his career on a house of cards of false beliefs. For if a man is gullible once, he can be gullible twice...

Cult Member Trainee

And if he is gullible twice, he can be thrice or ten or one hundred or more. Soon his many accepted false beliefs reinforce each other forming a nexus of self-deceit.

Fourth Cult Member

Do I hear blaspheme against god Richard?

Second Cult Member

Oh, no... We love Richard. Please, we will submit to any demand. Don't banish us. We were losers on the fringes before. Yet, now with god Richard, we have met others like us. We might be losers to outsiders, yet here, we are all winners.

Cult Member Trainee #2
(whispering to Cult Member Trainee #1)

Maybe we can get out of here before it's too late.

Cult Member Trainee #1

Yeah, these dorks talk about fake nerdy "trolls" as a way to attack outsiders. They don't want anyone ruining their delusion.

14. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158536 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 5:17 pm

Int. Internet Cafe -- Afternoon

Sane Guy

Wow, some folks have jeered Richard Dawkins, exposing his gullible nature as the foundation of his flawed beliefs. So what. I like him still. Who cares what others say.

Insane Guy

That bastard D.I. Ogenes. How dare he write about god Richard this way. I will spend my days and nights writing bad stuff about him. I don't care if D.I. Ogenes exposes all of our false beliefs and inconsistency of our being. Richard is my god!

15. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158521 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 4:53 pm

INT. The Cave -- Darkness

The Cult of Dawkins
(screaming)

Bwwwaaaaaa.. that D.I. Ogenes. He's ruining our trip.

First Cult Member

Bastard! He attacks our god Richard. Dawkins has taught us the true word.

Second Cult Member

Well, um. D.I. Ogenes makes some good points. He's right. We do follow Dawkins as our god and ...

Third Cult Member

Yeah, and we have accepted atheism as our doctrine much like any other cult that inculcates religion into the mind.

First Cult Member

Atheistic Blaspheme! How dare you speak of god Richard this way. Why we were losers, outsiders. He gave us our Identity and now we belong to a group. And not just any group, but a group of jeering irritants to all those who rejected us.

Fourth Cult Member

And you know what we do to those of the group who speak against the true word of god Richard.

First Cult Member

Yeah, we excommunicate them ...

Fourth Cult Member

Atheistically, of course.

Second Cult Member
(turning to Third Cult Member)

We'll be out of our last group if you say another word.

Third Cult Member

But, but ... that junk about memes. Dawkins conjured that story to shuttle the idea of Natural Selection into the minds of the unsuspecting.

Second Cult Member

Yeah, I know the whole concept of Memes is for the idiocy. They can't see how it's folks who learn catch phrases and games playing as a competitive advantage.

Third Cult Member

Yeah, that rubbish about "Happy Birthday to You" replicating itself seems all rather silly now.

First Cult Member
(stepping between)

If I catch either of you speaking against god Richard again and if you mention that truthsayer D.I. Ogenes once more, that's it for the two of you.

If you don't watch out, you'll be off to atheist hell.

16. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158506 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 4:19 pm

The many dummies here amuse with their lame attempts at ad hominem.

When they see the torchlight of truth shining upon their worshipped idol -- Richard Dawkins -- they scurry like the cockroaches they are.

My posts amplify the gullible state of mind that Richard Dawkins himself says he has.

Any man as gullible as Richard Dawkins must have a mind built entirely from experiences where that man was duped or confused as to what really happened. This is the state of mind of Richard Dawkins.

The sane man must come to one end. Richard Dawkins and his ideas rest upon a foundation of false belief.

The debate is not about the Existence of God.

The debate rests upon the Existence of Idiocy alone. Richard Dawkins by his acts and his words reveals himself to be an idiot -- "Mathis tricked me and Myers".

Atheism is a doctrine shuttled easily into a pathological mind.

The atheist suffers from an indoctrination induced deep psychosis.

This psychosis is the same as the same psychosis suffered by Jonestown Cult members, the Rabble of NAZI Germany, the Fox News NASCAR kill Iraqi crowd, Indulgences Statist Roman Catholican Church and many others.

Folks who defend Richard Dawkins in the face of criticism worship him as their idol, their substitute diety.

Fans of Dawkins suffer from indoctrination and conditioning. They lack an intellect to see their membership in the Cult of Dawkins.

17. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158476 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 3:16 pm

INT. Richard's bedroom in his Mom's House - NIGHT

Richard Dawkins
(sobbing)

Mathis tricked me and Myers.

Richards' Mom

There now Ricky. I'm sorry your dad was so stern with you. We tried to get you help ... to cure you of your obsession with all things God.

Richard

But mum, I am so dumb. I get tricked so easily. No wonder why I express myself from the nexus of false beliefs that swirl in my head. I feel so dizzy.

Richard's Mom

Oh, there Ricky, stop whining and crying.

Richard

But mum, will folks stop listening to me and my fraud career now that they know I am tricked so easily? Why, it's true. I will fall for anything!

Satan

Don't worry, Ricky. Your mother can't see me. I have some new ideas to teach you.

18. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158444 by D.I. Ogenes on April 10, 2008 at 2:20 pm

Whiny, effeminate Ricky Dawkins writes, "...Mathis tricked a number of scientists, including PZ Myers and me, into taking prominent parts in the film".

You must be one dumb guy to get tricked so easily.

Since you are dumb as now proven by your act and self-incrimination, how can anyone accept any of your opinions as you pontificate from the Church of Academia?

No wonder you have been tricked so easily into the Religion of Atheism.

From their waking moment, atheists obsess over God. They hate God. They cannot stop thinking about God.

Many Christians never think much about God, not even when sitting on church pews. Only until they get into a jam do they pray to God for help.

Ricky Dawkins suffers from a deep psychosis that manifests in OCD obsession over God.

Most likely, Ricky suffered from some trauma owing to his father.

All should call for their cash back from money paid to Richard Dawkins whether for books or tuition.

A man so easily tricked as Richard Dawkins says of himself will believe any story. Thus, his entire beliefs and what he expresses is false.